Discussion:
Big Bertha Thing sumation
(too old to reply)
Tony Lance
2007-05-30 16:39:41 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing sumation
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/sumation.html
Access Page for 78K Zip File
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics

Count the number of polka-dots on an equilatteral triangle.

Ready to run Fortran 77 program software, using double
precision and extended precision versions. Complete
with source code in listing format and the original
extended precision subroutine source code.
Sumation N = N*N + N all over 2, where N=1,2,3,..N
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 2000
To comply with my copyright, please distribute
complete and free of charge.


Big Bertha Thing postings

Depleted uranium shells were once used at great cost,
in terms of Gulf War Syndrome.

At Agincourt the English long bow took a large toll,
due to the arrows being armour-piercing and re-useable.

The above shells were armour-piercing,
but can hardly be called re-useable
and should not have been used once.

Big Bertha Thing posting features;-
1. Ornate Engraving and Scrollwork.
2. Re-useable.
3. Armour-piercing.
4. Zero casualties.
5. Re-configurable.
6. Accurate.
7. Tactical.
8. Strategic.
9. Scientific.
10. Weighty.
11. Start of Thread.
12. Brand Name.
13. Banned on moderators conference.
14. Whole moderators thread deleted,
with the exception of tenure posting.
15. Tenure read only request withdrawn.
16. 2K Anecdote (Assault Rifle Bullet and detonator.) Day 23
17. 4K Preface (Anecdote and Attachment description.) Day 24
18. 50K Attachment
(Powder charge for shell with detonator.) Days 1 - 20
19. 600K Attachment
(powder charge for bomb with detonator.) Days 21, 22
20. 50K postings pair, with 12 on-topic and 6 off-topic.
Hydrogen bomb (2 shells with jacket of water; H2O) Days 25, 26
21. Odd configurations. (Landmine, boobytrap and armistice terms.)
22. Zip disc spanning.
(Manual operation encryption technique.) Day 21, 22
23. Potential CD-Rom triology.
24. Astrophysics web-ring web site.
25. PI web-ring web site with software.
26. Web publisher for unpublished scientific works,
including fringe.
27. Particle periodic table research project with results
and software.
28. First Aid Tent for Spam Attack Victim Support Group.
29. Sesame Street beat Darth Vader twice.
(1st and 2nd Battles of Cyberspace.)
30. To the victor the spoils; a web site built on them.
(level 2 HTML)
31. Politics makes poor science.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


07 May 1998 19:29:10
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Educating Rita
To: FC Mods FC Queries
Educating Rita

This film portrays a dominant spouse and a long-suffering
student, to the extent upto and including divorce,
book-burning and forced pregnancy.

There was zero privacy. Any attempt to re-register or
change the password would not work, because the secret
could not be kept.

Every posting by the spouse is a violation of OU rules
and the students education, causing real pain. Vetting
by one moderator or by several using a non-public Rita
conf. would not work, because the spouse would use the
students name, with all the further alienation that
would cause.

A new policy needs to be adopted. The last resort
punishment measure, needs to be the first resort
measure on compassionate grounds; that of making the
student read-only on FC. The student would thank you
for it, but not publically.

It would need to be agreed between ACS and OUSA, which
is what they are there for.

Be kind,
Tony Lance
Tony Lance
2007-06-04 16:43:14 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing positron
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/positron.html
Access page JPG 56K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including talk.politics.guns

Round photographic plates.

Caption;-
Another pair of tracks, arising simultaneously,
from a common point. The two particles responsible,
for these tracks, produce equal specific ionizations.
The one leaving the track of greater curvature is an electron
of 27 MeV energy. The one leaving the track of smaller curvature
was apparently left, by a particle not then known to exist,
a particle identical with the electron,
except that it carries a positive charge. It is a 450 MeV positron.

From a book by
J.D.Stranathan Ph.D.,
Professor of Physics and Chairman of
Department, University of Kansas.
The "Particles" of Modern Physics.
(C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942


Big Bertha Thing forward

Friends and family postings are included in the category,
forwarded by you from the internet, to the internet,
First Class users or conferences.
The same terms and conditions apply.
There is no student or accademic only exclusion clause,
written or implied in them. You are personaly responsible for them.

On the question of from address, a new mail item,
in reply with quote format, either from you or the conference moderator
will do. For the subject line use Fwd: prefix.

Occams' Razor says the simplest explanation is usually right.

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997.
To comply with my copyright,
please distribute complete copies, free of charge.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


10 December 1997 19:05:39
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Big Bertha Thing jeremiah
To: OUSA Classical Particle
A film Jeremiah Johnson, not necessarily true.

A mountain man asked him, whether he was any good at skinning
bears. He said that he could skin them, faster than the mountain
man could catch them.

So running down the mountain, with a bear in hot pursuit. His
friend runs in the front door of the cabin and jumps out the
back window.

Quote
"You skin that one and I'll go catch me another one!"
Unquote.
Tony Lance
2007-06-05 16:23:37 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing pathos
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/pathos.html
Access page JPG 12K Image
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.cycling

Detail from painting of captive musketeers.

Caption:-
Porthos took hold of a bar (foot rail) with both hands

From the book
Twenty Years After
by Alexandre Dumas
Published by George G.Harrup & Co.Ltd., 1923
Reprinted 1929
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing poem

Some Days, Then Some

by Tony Lance

I've had better days, he thought and said.
When I could get my sorry butt out of bed.
When I wasn't mistook for as good as dead.
When they didn't fill my boots with all that lead.

There are days sometimes, of sunshine on my head.
Windswept shores viewed from along a beachy-head.
Carefree larks, in a clearly blue sky, over-head.
Then of course, I became a headmaster, the old man said.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing strategic
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:58:31 +0000


Tuesday, November 18, 1997 10:04:23 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Big Bertha Thing 1
To: FC Mods Discussion

From Bibliography of Pastures.(Optional)
The preface from
An Elementary Treatment of Gyroscopes and Similar Spinning Tops
by Crabtree 1909
Classic Cartoon and animated cartoon of
Animal Farm
by George Orwell

NB (2006) Stateside, all investment funding for super-colliders
is at ground zero; past, present and future.
Politics makes poor science.
Tony Lance
2007-06-06 15:49:20 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing Faculty
(Sequel to battle)
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/faculty.html
Access page 600K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.med

301 files from the second battle of cyberspace.

Students Research Faculty

1. Existence
2. Zero interference
3. Foundation (Students, tutors or funding)
4. Articles (See Armistice terms)
5. Publications (See overview)
6. Projects (Pastures, Moisture, Big Bertha, Strategic Studies)
7. Staff (First Aid Tent, volunteers, moderators)
8. Access (All user or staff only.)
9. SRF Classical Astronomy (see OUSA Research, All user)
10. SRF Net Access Policy (See OUSA Research, All user)
11. SRF Los Alamos (see Armistice terms, OUSA Research, restricted access.)
12. SRF Big Bertha (See SRF Los Alamos, staff only.)
13. SRF Strategic Studies (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.)
14. SRF Specification (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.)
15. SRF Mathematics (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.)
16. SRF Prototype (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.)
17. SRF Yesterslaggings (SRF Net Access Policy, all user)
18. OUSA Classical Particle (OUSA Research, All user)


Big Bertha Thing galios

Nobody understood a thing he said, when he was alive.
After he was dead, they decided that he had done a good job.
The Galios Theory branch of mathematics bears his name.
Now they are trying to teach me, what he did in the first place.
Do you think that the penny will drop, before it becomes posthumous?

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Big Bertha Thing warlord
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:17:10 +0000


Big Bertha Thing warlord

The last time I heard that an apology given under duress was valid,
was in the Monty Python' comedy sketch on the Spanish Inquisition.
Everytime anyone said Spanish Inquisition,
then 3 red cardinals turned up to organise it.

What do I have in comon with a Texas cattle baron?
He thinks that he is a bigger liar than I am. I think I am.

What does a drill sargeant have in comon with a chinese warlord?
He says that the sun will not rise tomorrow. His men believe it.

What is the difference between a Texas cattle baron and a
chinese warlord? The one knows he is lying. The other has never had the problem.


Big Bertha Thing adversity

Milton (1644) from The Liberty of Unlicensed Printing.

First, when a city shall be as it were besieged and blocked about,
her navigable river infested, inroads and incursions round,
defiance and battle oft rumoured to be marching up
even to her walls and suburb trenches;
that then the people, or the greater part, more than at other times,
wholly taken up with the study of the highest and most important matters
to be reformed, should be disputing, reasoning, reading, inventing,
discourcing, even to a rarity and admiration,
things not before discourced or written of,
argues first a singular good will,
contentedness and confidence in your prudent forsight,
and safe government, Lords and Commons;
and from thence derives itself to a gallant bravery and well-grounded contempt
of their enemies, as if there were no small number of as great spirits among us,
as his was, who when Rome was nigh besieged by Hannibal, being in the city,
bought that piece of ground at no cheap rate
whereon Hannibal himself encamped his own regiment.
Next, it is a lively and cheerful presage of our happy success and victory.
For as in a body, when the blod is fresh, the spirits pure and vigorous,
not only to vital, but to rational faculties,
and those in the acutes and the pertest operations of wit and subtilty,
it argues in what good plight and constitution the body is;
so when the cheerfulness of the people is so sprightly up,
as it has not only wherewith to guard well its own freedom and safety,
but to spare, and to bestow upon the solidest and sublimest points of contyroversy,
and new invention, it betokens us not degenerated,
nor drooping to a fatal decay,
by casting off the old and wrinkled skin of corruption to outlive these pangs,
and wax young again, entering the glorious ways of truth and prosperous virtue,
destined to become great and honourable in these latter ages.
Methinks I see in my mind a noble and puissant nation rousing herself like a strong man
after sleep, and shaking her inincible locks;
methinks I see her as an eagle nursing her mighty youth,
and kindling her undazzled eyes at the full mid-day beam;
purging and unscaling her long-abused sight at the fountain itself of heavenly radiance;
while the whole noise of timorous and flocking birds,
with those also that love the twilight, flutter about amazed at what she means,
and in their envious gabble would prognosticate a year of sects and schisms.


Big Bertha Thing liberty

Milton (1644) from The Liberty of Unlicensed Printing
What should ye do then,
should ye suppress all this flowery crop of knowledge and new light sprung up
and yet springing daily in this city?
Should ye set an oligarchy of twenty engrossers over it,
to bring a famine upon our minds again,
when we shall know nothing but what is measured to us by their bushell?
Believe it, Lords and Commons! they who counsel you to such a suppression,
do as good as bid ye suppress yourselves; and I will soon show how.
If it be desired to know the immediate cause of all this free writing and free speaking,
there cannot be assigned a truer than your own mild, and free, and humane government:
it is the liberty, Lords and Commons,
which your own valorous and happy counsels have purchased us;
liberty, which is the nurse of all great wits;
this is that which hath rarified and enlightened our spirits like the influence of heaven;
this is that which hath enfranchised, enlarged,
and lifted up our apprehensions degrees above themselves.
Ye cannot make us now less capable, less knowing,
less eagerly pursuing of the truth, unless ye first make yourselves,
that made us so, less the lovers, less the founders of our true liberty.
We can grow ignorant again, brutish, formal, slavish, as ye found us;
but you then must first become that which ye cannot be,
oppressive, arbitrary, and tyrannous, as they were from whom ye have freed us.
That our hearts are now more capacious,
our thoughts more erected to the search and expectations of greatest and exactest things,
is the issue of your own virtue propagated in us; ye cannot suppress that,
unless ye reinforce an abrogated and merciless law,
that fathers may despatch at will their own children.
And who shall then stick closest to ye, and excite others?
not he who takes up arms for coat and conduct, and his four nobles of Dangelt.
Although I dispraise not the defence of just immunities,
yet love my peace better, if that were all. Give me the liberty to know,
to utter, and to argue freely, according to conscience, above all liberties.


Big Bertha Thing indomitable

(1938) about biography of Lord Grey of Falloden

Lord Grey of Falloden sprang from a Northumberland family of country squires,
who for generations had played a part in public affairs.
His own pleasures lay in the country, but his sense of duty drove him into politics.
He was happiest fishing for trout, and watching wild birds,
but once he was a member of parliament his abilities and character
won for him a prominence that gave him little time for such pursuits.
From 1905 to 1916 Lord Grey was Foreign Secretary.
It is strange that the man whose heart was never entirely in politics
should have risen to such a high office, should have held it so long,
and in such crucial years.

It is possible to consider Lord Grey's life as a failure.
His sense of duty prevented him from living the life he loved.
His efforts to preserve the peace of Europe suffered the defeat of August 1914,
that darkened the rest of his life.
He sacrificed his eyesight in his wartime service in the government.
When at last release came, and he returned to his birds and books,
he could no longer see them. Domestic griefs beset him.
Yet as our extract from his biography shows,
from this tragic material his serene and strong nature
won a greatness that is an inspiration and splendid example.(Two extracts follow)

He was equally cut off from books, of which as life advanced he had grown scarcely less
fond.

I classify the different parts of my body as being
of different ages, as thus:
Sense of smell aged 99 years
Eyes 95
Stomach 85
Sense of Hearing 56 (My age)
Brain 56
Heart and lungs 45
It makes an unequal team to get along with.
Tony Lance
2007-06-07 18:12:25 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing sedan
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/sedan.html
Access page 19K JPG Image
Astrophysics net ring Access Site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.railway

Painting showing, so called hands up the pole sedan chair.

Caption;-
A Mandarin in his sedan-chair.

Extract;-
Jostling along is a most motley crowd. Here, for example,
comes the handsomely-decorated chair
of a mandarin who is engaged on state business.
Before him run two attendants armed with whips to clear the way,
and behind them are boys carrying large painted boards
on which is written, "Stand aside!" or "Respectful silence, please!"

From the book
The World and Its People
Asia With Special Reference to British Possessions
Published by Thomas Nelson and Sons 1903
Without Author or Editor Name
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing Bertha

First Big Bertha posting was to first aid tent
in OUSA Classical Particle Conf.,
to provide aid and comfort to victims,
who had been set upon by unnamed e-mail thugs.

There was no way to make direct contact,
with shell shocked victim, so we tried Big Bertha.
The trick worked and first victim is well again,
after saying, "At last, a normal man!"
Since then Big Bertha has developed a life of her own
and actually caught some thugs in the act.

First posting consisted of two anecdotes effort and repairs,
from Big Bertha Thing gamma and particle respectively.
Effort was also the last assault rifle shot fired.
Rollover and shotgun below, were the first Big Bertha
sent in anger, with reply to all sender and copy to conf.
Progress and anecdote forward was first cannon shot fired.
Spider and fact(newsletter and readership for astronomy)
was first landmine explosion,
which was not even deployed on OUSA Astronomy.

Big Bertha Thing apology(Rollover)

Please accept my apologies for troubling you.
It will not of course be repeated.
However 3 net surfers have responded
to my call to help out on the Conf., by volunteering.

In emergency situations, needs must.
You and your fellow net surfers number 3, I see.
Net surfers have broad shoulders,
thick skins and I trust, compassion.

Big Bertha Thing shotgun

By way of light relief, a similar general apology,
to the one above, would bring solace and comfort,
to the victims of such well intentioned postings.
Please put it in a Big Bertha and address to conf.
That of course, would be the end of spam.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing testament
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:00:03 +0000


Thursday, November 13, 1997 01:53:36 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Re: spam and tony
To: FC Mods Discussion
Guilty as charged, I should not have done any of the following;-
1. defended you in the mods conf.
2. given you an invitation, when the dogs were at the door.
3. offered a refuge for the explosion survivors.
4. ticked off the mods.
5. put your name up in lights on OUSA Astronomy and Astronomy and Space.
6. Put back the release of my software package, just because of the troubles.

Personally I would take me out and shoot me, there is no punishment too bad for
any mod, who gets even one complaint. We should be above reproach,
like Caesers' wife.

I will of course remove the words 'Extract to explain the project to Philip Sims'
from all further postings.
Please accept my appologies for all the bad things I did,
before your elevation to mod. I only pick on little people.

Thank you,
Tony Lance.
Tony Lance
2007-06-08 18:20:29 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing dwarf
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/dwarf.html
42K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.astronomy

White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, And Black Holes

v1.0
01 sep 99
greg goebel
public domain

Contents List:-

1.THE DISCOVERY OF WHITE DWARFS

2.WHITE DWARFS AND ELECTRON DEGENERACY

3.THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF WHITE DWARFS

4.WHITE DWARFS AND THE AGE OF THE GALAXY

5.BEYOND WHITE DWARFS?

6.NEUTRON STARS DISCOVERED

7.CHARACTERISTICS OF NEUTRON STARS

8.MILLISECOND PULSARS AND OTHER UNUSUAL NEUTRON STARS

9.BLACK HOLES DISCOVERED?

10.MINIHOLES

11.COMMENTS, SOURCES, AND REVISION HISTORY


Big Bertha Thing checklist

Neighbour checklist

1.Your child beaten up?
2.Rat-proof dustbins?
3.Broken windows?
4.You have apologised?
5.Police called out?
6.Security lighting?
7.New fences?
8.No Leylandii?
9.No Russian Vine?
10.No Solicitors letters sent?

Our score is 10, one neighbour scores 1, another scores 5.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing testament
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:45:56 +0000


Friday, November 21, 1997 06:15:45 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: First Aid Tent on Classical Particle
To: Erica Clifford
Philip Sims
Cc: Tracey Sait
gary.s Cresswell
Jonno Johnson
Big Bertha Thing 2 knitting
To: FC Mods Discussion
To: CP Conf
From: Philip Sims Moderator

2. Without loss of generality, one can take p to be north and a positive definite metric
rather than a Lorentzian one, there is a geodesic of minimal length,
rather than a geodesic of maximum length.
This minimal geodesic will be a line of longitude running from p to q.
BUT there will be another geodesic from p to q which runs down the back up to q.
This geodesic contains a point conjugate to p at the south where all the geodesics
from p intersect. Both the geodesics from p to q are stationary under a small variation.

By Erica Clifford
Head of First Aid Tent on Classical Particle Conference
(Extract from Open University Course Unit Nameless)
End of Big Bertha 2

Erika meet Philip.
Philip meet Erika.

Philip will post your Big Bertha Victim Support postings,
to immortalise each victim in print.
No more than one per victim.
No more than one per day.
Please remember more Sesame Street, than Darth Vader.
If a picture paints a thousand words, then why can't I
paint you?

Each will have a unique pattern name, from the following
list, prepared by my wife. You can add to it yourself, as
needed.

Would some kind person, please send a letter of thanks and
explanation of what it will be used for, to my wife.
She loves me dearly, but thinks I am a typical husband.
Waste of space, makes the room look untidy and needs
dusting round. At least it keeps me sane, healthy and
contented.

List
knitting Erika
fairisle
aran
rib
cable
fisherman
moss
plain
purl
blanket
cross
tacking
hemming
herringbone
tartan
plaid
argyle

Thank for all your help and support.
Tony Lance
The Sanity Inspector
2007-06-08 19:49:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tony Lance
Big Bertha Thing dwarf
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructshttp://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/dwarf.html
42K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.astronomy
White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, And Black Holes
v1.0
01 sep 99
greg goebel
public domain
Why re-post an eight-year old astro-physics article?

--
bruce
The dignified don't even enter in the game.
-- The Jam
Tony Lance
2007-06-11 18:13:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Sanity Inspector
Post by Tony Lance
Big Bertha Thing dwarf
Why re-post an eight-year old astro-physics article?
Hi there,
Big Bertha is the name of a lady tramp in the cartoon series the Tramps.
It is also the name of a german artillary field piece mounted on a railway
carriage, used to bombard Paris.
Big Bertha Thing is a scientific cartoon series, some work, some don't.
It is also a siege canon, assault rifle and first aid tent. (Carafat)
The anecdotes, poems and jokes, at the end of each postings (2nd place),
started as postcards to the first aid tent. When it was attacked by
left wing moderators at university, they became assault rifle bullits.
They were then upgraded to artillary shells by the addition of pictures
of sub-atomic particles, which looked like shell holes.
(gamma, electron, proton, positron and positive.)
Some additions were part of a scientifix project.
(summation, extract, pastures, moisture, features, letter, outlandish)
Mathematical - PI
Contextual in terms of battle.
(pathos, tidings, sedan, chair, pin-wheel, progress, balloon,
hacked, invite)
Scientific (spider, coil, gyro, monorail, halfrail, dwarf, burster,
uniform, lightcraft, unified, fusion.)
Collections of postings. (battle, faculty, retrenchment, redoubt, mathematics and
astronomy.)
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/series.html

Thank you,
Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk

Monday, November 10, 1997 01:41:47 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Big Bertha
To: OUSA Classical Particle
Hey! I've just found out, something really interesting.
For the next three months, this conference is the only
crap-shoot in town.

So step right up and try Big Bertha, otherwise known as
Pastures.

Just two things;-
1. If you see someone slogging away, but doing it all wrong.
Please remember, a great effort, with no results, is worth
more than a great result with no effort. The first is purchased
at great cost and the latter, in terms of cost, is worthless.
2. If it is not broken, do not fix it. Some parts of the project
may need repairing. If you cannot fix it, with a good suggestion,
then do not take it apart, in the first place, with a bad one.
Thank you,
Tony Lance

NB Subject Big Bertha and 'Just two things:-' gives brand name:-
Big Bertha Thing
Big Bertha Thing 3
Big Bertha Thing farm
Big Bertha Thing battle,farm (common)
Big Bertha Thing battle,farm,fusion (common, message)

There is an old joke about prisoners, who know all the old jokes,
so they gave them numbers. A new prisoner on finding out what is
going on, decides to call out a number. Nothing. Zilch. Dinada.
On querying this, he is told, that it is the way he tells them.

The parts of Big Bertha called common are based on this principle.
Tony Lance
2007-06-10 18:06:35 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing moisture
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/moisture.html
Access page to 73K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including misc.health.aids

Working Prototype of second phase Pastures software,
with 20 polyhedrons model and 200 buckminster fullerine molecules model,
complete with programs, source code in listing format and using Pastures
documentation.

Moisture Software Package.
(Based on Particle Structure Results Program, in Fortran 77.)
Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System.
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing virus

18th October 1999
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the Keyboard.drv, but Windows is still down.
The new messages are;
1. Clock General Protection Fault in gdi.exe (system)
2. Progman Ditto krnl386.exe (system)

Clock.exe see windows. Progman.exe see windows.
The two options seem to be, to try another four files
for windows 3.11 or save up and update PC. (130 pounds)

They have a nice 486DX66 16MB 270MB hard-drive 14" SVGA
and win 95, at the same place I bought the 386PC. It
is four times faster too. My biggest program takes 7 hours
on standard IBM PC, 90 minutes on 386 and 20 minutes on
486DX, which has a built in maths co-processor.

My DOS browser can read newsgroups, send/receive e-mail, browse
web, but not receive attachments, look up my own site or
update it.

Keyboard.drv worked, but closed down every app in windows,
so there was no way out. Clever that. The scrub round was
in the book, for bypassing emm386. Wait till boot up gets
to MSDOS loading and press F8. Step through Config.sys
line-by-line with y answer. It then goes through autoexec.bat
to last line of win. N answer drops you out to DOS prompt.

Strange to say I can still work on my science maths project
using Fortran 77 in DOS. Apps down with windows are Free Agent,
WS-ftple, Winzip, F-Prot, Anyware Virus, Chekmate Virus, FirstClass
client.

It looks like I picked up a macro virus off a wordperfect attachment
from e-mail of a guy in newsgroup. Three virus apps missed it.
It is visible in notepad view of file after saving with write.exe.
Isolate 386 and do not update site.

You might check that my site is still up, by the back door and let me
know the count. <www.bertha.ndirect.co.uk/series.htm>

It could not have happened to a nicer chap.
Thank you,
Tony Lance


Big Bertha Thing designer

Once there was Big Blue, Baby Bell and Pax IBM.
Now ther is Big Bertha, Baby Bill and Pax Microsoft.

1980 The Greater London Council, Central Computer Service installation
standards for IBM mainframe had standard date subroutines as mandatory.

1980 No standards for Prime minicomputer, so date subroutine for program
was written to be 2075 OK, by me.

All IBM customers and suppliers applied IBM standards. Enforcement of these
standards means that the following instances can only be designer
software obsolescence.(Smoking Gun features.)
1. First PC operating system DOS was written 1980 (IBM/Microsoft) No 2000
2. Next PC operating system MS-DOS (Microsoft) No 2000
3. Windows 95 enabled macro virus (Microsoft) admitted
4. Windows 95 macro virus written by Microsoft.(admitted)
5. Windows 95 macro virus released by Microsoft.(admitted)
6. Windows 98 enabled text virus (Microsoft) admitted
7. Windows 98 no product recall, fix is on Microsoft website only.
8. Windows 98 to release virus just say it exists and fix is on website.
9. 1997 MS-DOS 6.20 licensed copy sold for Microsoft with no 2000.
10. 1999 Windows 3.11 virus closes all applications leaving no exit.


Big Bertha Thing history

1st virus was boot sector virus, which was first sector of floppy disc or
start here sector.

2nd virus was program virus, which is enabled with on/off switch, by
operating system as primary function thereoff.(exe, sys, com)

3rd virus was macro virus, which is enabled with on/off switch, by
wordprocessor or other application software.(doc)

4th virus was zip virus, which is enabled with on/off switch, by
zip application software.(zip)

5th virus was text virus, which is enabled with on/off switch, by
operating system as a purely viral function, otherwise uneccessary.(txt)
Since 1980 the text virus has been impossible. 18 years to crack it, with
Windows 98 by Microsoft.

42 million Windows 3.xx users.
12 million e-mail only users.
Windows 95 not known.
Windows 98 not known.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


24 November 1997 22:26:03
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: First Aid Tent on Classical Particle
To: Ben Plumpton
Cc: Pam Scruton
Attachments: ARCH0000.TXT 2K
I am apalled by your action, in summarilly deleting, the message from the victim support
group, which consists
entirely of people, that internet thugs have spammed into a comatose state.

Do you want them to have a relapse? Please be a bit more circumspect, in your dealings
with them in future.

I am passing your message to me, on to Pam, whom I feel is better qualified to give you an
objective answer.

Assuring you of my full support, in your efforts as mod.

Thank You,

Tony Lance
Tony Lance
2007-06-11 18:14:09 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing invite
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/invite.html
Access page to 55K Zip File
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics.bush

301 files from the third battle of cyberspace. (part two)

60 Newsgroup postings were deleted, after 15 hours.
There were claims of major hacker attack,
which turned to abashed embarassment.

It turned out that the NSP owner,
had sent out a world-wide posting.
It invited all users, who had forgotten their passwords,
to just leave it blank. Then a new confirmation password
would be sent. Cinderela was invited to the ball.

Thank you,
Tony Lance

Big Bertha Thing format

Anybody heard of the fly-paper trap?
Where all the flies are collected, in an unsightly mess,
hanging from the kitchen ceiling.
The expensive version is the lizard with a long tongue,
that retracts after each catch.

Take an uncensored version of a usenet newsgroup,
show the subject line of each thread header,
with the total number of postings and the net
number of postings after extracts.
Put the total number of extracts, in the first line,
at the top of the list of postings.
Anyone wishing to search the extracts clicks on it
and finds each person extracted with 2 lines each.
The first line shows the number of thread headers
and the second the number of replies.
Further clicks go down to posting level.

Extract everyone with more than 1000 postings
on any single newsgroup, from all newsgroups.

Examples of the fly-paper trap can be found on:-
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/news.html
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/want04.html
Thank you,
Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Big Bertha Thing mayor
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:06:57 +0000


Big Bertha Thing mayor

4th October 2000
ex-GLC LPFA/DETR pension rights abuse case
Mr.Ken Livingstone
Mayor of Greater London
Dear Sir,
Local Government Pension Scheme Appeal
In their letter of 12th May 2000, from Mr.K.A.Bloomfied, the DETR upheld
my appeal. I would be gratefull for the opportunity to summarize
subsequent events.

I had applied for early retirement on medical grounds, to the London
pension Fund Authority. My last appeal was to the DETR. They upheld my
appeal and instructed LPFA to grant me an independant medical review.
The grounds were that the LPFA Medical Advisor was under qualified and not
independant enough. Their decision was final and they would not discuss
the matter further. Any further appeal would be to the Ombudsman.

The LPfA Director claims that the LPFA Medical Advisor is qualified and
shows a letter discussing the qualification. He claims that due to this,
the instruction is void and he proposes to take no further action.

DETR was the statutory supervisory body for the LPFA.
LPFA is the statutory successor authority to the Greater London Council.
The Ombudsman has no authority to enforce his judgement on the LPFA.

Under the GLC, the final appeal was to a committee of members of the
council. Upon abolition by statutory transfer, the final appeal was to
be to the Secretary of State for DETR; Mr.John Prescott MP.

Since July 2000 the LPFA is directly accountable to Mr.Ken Lingstone.
Would you please sort out this problem for me. I enclose below some
of my correspondence with the DETR and DHSS, as background.

Thanking you in anticipation of your kind attention to this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Lance


Big Bertha Thing minister

Contact Mr. Phil Goodwin
Director of Operations
London Pensions Fund Authority
8th February 2000
For the Attention of Mr. John Prescott,
Government Minister,
Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions,
Local Government Pensions Division,
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions,
Dear Mr. Prescott,
Local Government Pension Scheme (LPGS)

I claim my right of appeal to you, as Secretary of State. This was notified
to me by Mr. Goodwin, the Director of Operations of the London Pensions
Fund Authority, in his letter of 5th January 2000, which is enclosed. The
appeal is against the decision not to allow me an early retirement on
medical grounds.

Both the officers, who have dealt with my appeal, have made comments
which are prejudicial. My doctor has said that in his view, I will never
work again. Their view was that the medical grounds are insufficient and
that my background notes to the case are immaterial, sight unseen.

Given that I have the right to attach these notes to the medical
report of my doctor, to maintain that they are immaterial sight unseen,
negates my right. Since my right is statutary, granted by the mother
of parliaments, it should stand and the notes be deemed material evidence.

Please find enclosed copies of my letters to the LPFA dated 25th October 1999
and 2nd December 1999. These together with my letter of 29th April 1999 to
DHSS provide a summary of the case, which will let you decide whether to
proceed further.

The two prejudical comments are given below.

Extract from letter dated 8th November 1999.
From LPFA doctor to LPFA Mr.Scott. Quote
I regret that the enclosures with your letter were not complete, I only
received the first page of Mr Lance's letter of appeal, but none the less,
having reviewed the medical evidence which I have received in this case,
I do not wish to amend or add to my medical report dated 14th October 1999.
Unquote

Extract from letter dated 13th December 1999.
From director to LPFA doctor. Quote
In your letter of 8th November you refer to a "missing page"
from Mr Lance's letter as copied to you. This is now attached
and I shall be obliged if you are able to confirm that this
would have had no material bearing on your opinion.
Unquote

On the bi-focals, mentioned in my letter of 25th Octeber 1999 to LPFA.
It took me two years to find out, that they are not bi-focals. I said
I had trouble with the eye test and nobody believed me. I can get
a refund from the optician.

This brings me to another grounds for appeal. It is a catch 22 situation,
where they think that I am too sick to know, that I am sick enough to
claim early retirement. They are trying to do a "Monty Python Dead Parrot
Sketch" job on me, like the optician did.

You will probably remember how this goes.
Close enough quotation.
I want a refund, for this parrot you sold me?
What's wrong with it?
It's dead.
When did it die?
It was dead, when you sold it to me.
Was it on it's perch, when we sold it to you?
Yes.
Then it must have been alive. How did it stay on it's perch?
It was glued on.
Then how do you know it's dead?
It fell off. It's not even a parrot.
Of course it's a parrot, it's green isn't it?
It's painted green.
End of quotation.

On you being a minister of the crown. Your bill to turn a statute into
guidelines is a bit of a "dead parrot" job. Guidelines are based
on good faith and statutes are based on bad faith. The statute states
that local government authorities shall not "intentionally promote
homosexuality" nor "the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended
family relationship." Anybody sitting down to teach schoolchildren
respect for unspeakable acts, as a form of family life, cannot be said
to be acting in good faith. It is to be put to a free vote of like
minded politicians; opticians to a man.

Thanking you in anticipation of your kind attention to this matter and
looking forward to the favour of your reply.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Lance
ex-branch president
Boilermakers Trade Union(GMB)
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance
www.bertha.ndirect.co.uk (disabled)
CC. Internet Usenet newgroups sci.astro et al. (Without addresses, names)


Big Bertha Thing appeal

2nd December 1999
For Attention of Mr. Phillip Goodwin,
Director of Operations,
London Pensions Fund Authority,
Dear Mr. Goodwin,

Local Government Pension Scheme (LPGS)

Further to your letter of 25th November 1999 and our telephone
conversation yesterday, regarding my second appeal.

In your letter you mention that my reservations were conveyed to your doctor.
This was in fact, not the case. In his letter of 8th November 1999, to your
Mr.Scott, what he said is given in the extract below.

"I regret that the enclosures with your letter were not complete, I only
received the first page of Mr. Lance's letter of appeal, but none the less,
having reviewed the medical evidence which I have received in this case,
I do not wish to amend or add to my medical report dated 14th October 1999."

I would thank you for your assurance that my letter of appeal dated
25th October 1999 and my letter to DSS of 29th April 1999 would be taken
into account, in your current independant review of my second appeal,
following the rejection of my application.

I would confirm that there is no further medical evidence to come. There
are, however, two incidents, which may have some bearing. One DSS doctor
asked me why I have had no tests done. I replied that my doctor already
knew what it was. It was a pinched nerve in my back causing my legs to
be inflamed. Another DSS doctor went so far as to lie me down and
examine my legs, to see if they were inflamed. I was not told the
result, but passed my all work fitness test, as unfit for work.

I trust that this will be in order and look forward to the favour of your
reply.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Lance


Big Bertha Thing application

Contact: Tarek El-Din
25th October 1999
London Pension Fund Authority,
Dear Sir,
Re: LOCAL GOVERNMENT PENSION SCHEME.
Further to your letter of 18th October 1999, rejecting my application
for early retirement on medical grounds. I am writing to appeal against
your decision, on the following grounds;-
1. Question of Procedure.
2. Question of Fact.

Twice during the 21 day period to inspect the medical report, I called
at the surgery after 4.30 pm, to be told it was out of office hours, so not
available. The third time, I called at 10.30 am on 18th October 1999, to be
told that the 21 days had expired and the report had already been sent. It
was dated 29th September 1999, which by my reckoning was the 20th day since
it became available. This being said, there was no opportunity to attach
my notes. Hence the procedure had not been complied with.

The report itself, was the first time I had heard of the diagnosis of
sciatica, the three months duration or the infrequent attendance at
surgery. In view of this, I would ask you to bear with me, while I go
through the facts of the case.

On 3rd April 1996, I was told by my doctor, that the strong pain in
both legs was caused by a pinched nerve in my back, which caused my legs
to be inflamed.

I was prescribed 14 No. Voltarol Retard 100 mg tablets, for inflamation.
8 days later the pain stopped, so I still have 6 tablets left.

Since then and continuously for over three years, I have had three well
defined symptons as follows;-
1. I cannot do mental or physical work, for longer than 30 minutes per day.
2. I cannot stand still for longer than 10 minutes, without getting dizzyness
and palpatations.
3. I cannot sit still for an eye test for longer than 7 minutes, without
distress and my eyes going out of focus.

The latest symptom and one which causes me most concern, is that I cannot
read a brand new science fiction book by a favourite author. I recently
returned 12 such books to the library unread. They had been accumulated over
a period of months.

Background circumstances;-
1. 14th October 1990 redundant from job as senior computer programmer.
2. 1991 to 1994 successfully completed first four years towards Open
University degree in Mathematics degree course and awarded Dip.Math(Open)
3. 1995 withdrew from 12 hours per week course, due to family problems.
4. 1996 unable to complete even one homework of 6 hours per week course,
did not take exam and failed course.
5. 1996 fence repairs of 7 hours, actually took 3 weeks at 30 minutes per
day.
6. I have spent 6 years on the dole and 3 years on the sick.
7. MED4 long term sickess note for DSS, simply said general debility.
8. DSS medical exams coducted three times, all with mention of symptoms and
tablets. Passed all work test as unfit for work each time.
9. 4th DSS medical exam deemed unnecessary by DSS, as I was unfit for work.
10. Since I was not receiving treatment, frequent attendance at surgery was
never mentioned by Dr.Cullen.
11. Since 1955 I have been under ENT, with yearly appointments for ear
infections due to mastiod cavity following opperation.
12. I have stopped wearing my hearing aid, due to increased frequency of
infections.
13. I have been unable to wear my bi-focals from new, since 2 out of 4
lenses are out of focus and neither form a useable pair of lenses.
14. I also use a walking stick, inside and outside the home.

I regard both the tablets and the bi-focals as factual evidence, that
would stand up in a court of law or medical enquiry.

Trusting that this appeal will be in order and looking forward to the
favour of your reply.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Lance Dip.Math(Open)


Big Bertha Thing welfare

29th April 1999
Operations Manager,
The Benefits Agency,
Dear Sirs,
Further to your letter of 28th April 1999, regarding a list of
questions, on the possibility of my working at all.

I will attempt to answer your questions, in order as listed in your
letter.

1. I am not working, I am just pottering arround on the internet. I last
registered for course work with the Open University in 1997. This would have
involved 6 hours work per week. I could only manage half-an-hour per day,
so totally failed to do the work or complete the course. Not even one
homework assignment was completed.
In August 1997, I bought a second hand computer for 150 pounds sterling,
and was given free access to the Open University computer along local
telephone lines at a call charge of 1p per minute.
Since that time, I managed to build up a body of correspondence,
within the limits of half-an-hour per day mental or physical work.
In January 1999, this correspondence was transfered by me to my
web site; www.bertha.ndirect.co.uk. I have to pay 14 pounds and 9p per
month for this site.

2. Nobody suggested it, it just happened.
3. My doctor does not know that I have a web site.
4. See answer 1 for description of my activities. No job is being done,
so no job description exists.

5. No employer exists or payments have been recieved.
6. I can think straight for half-an-hour per day. The rest of the time is
spent pottering arround. I can do one side of A4 paper of mathematics or
computer work per day.

7. On any day free of a major shopping expedition, I can do half-an-hour
of original work and about an hour of copy typing at non-typist speeds.

8. My principle interest is a 50 year scientific project, which was started
30 years ago. If I could spend 48 hours per week doing it I would. However
half-an-hour work and an hour pottering, seems to be all I can manage and at
that not every day of the week.
Due to my condition, I asked Mrs. Pam Scruton, a fellow Open
University student to be the project archivist for my work on the Open
University computer. She agreed and kept the archive of the correspondence
which is now on my web site. This is both an unusual request and an
unusually generous service to a fellow student on incapacity benefit.

9. Zero income for as far as the eye can see.
10. Not applicable, zero wages or income.
11. August 1997 and is ongoing.

I trust that the above will put the internet feeding frenzy of the
newspaper hype into some perspective.
Yours faithfully.
Tony Lance Dip.Math(Open)
Tony Lance
2007-06-12 18:56:46 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing Chair
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/chair.html
Access page JPG 18K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access Site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.railway

Detail from frontspiece painting showing,
so called arms up to chair sedan.

Caption;-
A Chinese Street

From the book
The World and Its People
Asia With Special Reference to British Possessions
Published by Thomas Nelson and Sons 1903
Without Author or Editor Name
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing Serpico

Serpico was an honest cop in New York, that was all he ever wanted.
As he lay, in his hospital bed, recovering from being shot in the face,
all he could bear to watch on TV was Sesame Street.

At one time or another, he had upset every cop on the force, except one.
Now, he even had mayor John Lindsay, dancing in attendance.
He still thought, it was worth it.

Now he lives in Switzerland, on a disability pension.
There is this incredible sense of deja vu,
even down to the walking stick.
Most days he feels fine, even if occasionally he could sleep for a week.

Bibliography;-
Serpico by Peter Maas
(C) Copyright 1973 by Peter Maas and Tsampa Company, Inc.
Published by William Collins Sons & Co.Ltd. Glasgow.
Serpico film by Paramount Pictures
True story covered by
New York Times (3rd February 1971)

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro, sci.chem
From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:52:45 +0000
Local: Fri, Feb 16 2007 4:52 pm
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing unified

Friday, November 14, 1997 01:43:02 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Big Bertha Thing 5
To: FC Mods Discussion
Big Bertha Thing 5

Some people think that Big Bertha is less suitable for the
Mods Conf., than for Classical Particle Conf.
Have they heard the long name for CP Conf?
High Energy Particle Physics Rock Hard Science With a
Fringe Perspective.
They think that is a better place to put Big Bertha.
They must be besides themselves, which proves the thing.
Tony Lance
2007-06-13 17:48:31 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing unified
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/pip.html
111K Web Page access page
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including soc.history.medieval

RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM PHYSICS

The unification of
Quantum
and relativity theory

by Sidereus Nuncius
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics
Subject: What Time Is (I to IV)
Date: 18 Sep 1999

CONTENTS

TOPIC
1.Devotion
2.Dedication
3.Abstract
4.Introduction
5.Theory of Time
6.Theory of Space
7.Theory of Motion
8.Relativistic Quantum Physics


Big Bertha Thing pip

Dear Pip,
Guilty as charged. I should not have done any of the following;-

1.Defended you in the moderators newsgroup.
2.Given you an invitation, when the dogs were at your door.
3.Offered you a refuge, with the spam explosion survivors.
4.Ticked off the moderators.
5.Put your name up in lights on OUSA Astronomy and Astronomy and Space.
6.Put back the release of my software package,
just because of the spam troubles.

Personally I would take me out and shoot me,
there is no punishment too bad for any moderator,
who gets even one complaint. We should be above reproach,
like Caesers' wife.

I will of course remove the words
"Extract to explain the project to Pip" from all further postings.

Please accept my appologies for all the bad things I did,
before your elevation to moderator. I only pick on little people.
Thank you,
Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro, sci.chem
From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:08:08 +0000
Local: Sat, Feb 17 2007 5:08 pm
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing unified

Friday, November 14, 1997 01:46:13 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Big Bertha Thing 6
To: OUSA Classical Particle
Big Bertha Thing 6

6. My beautiful laundrette only had two machines, so I asked
my customers, if they would bring there own in.
Now we have seven machines and it is very nice.
Once we get the water pipes and electricity laid, it will
be magnificent. For water read data and electricity read
documentation.
Tony Lance
2007-06-14 17:41:15 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing particle
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/structur.html
7K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.med.nutrition

Outlandish Particle Periodic Table in Structure Order.

From Pastures Software Package Documentation.
(Particle Structure Results Program, in Fortran 77.)
Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System.
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing repairs

If it is not broken, do not fix it.
Some parts of the project may need repairing.
If you cannot fix it, with a good suggestion,
then do not take it apart, in the first place,
with a bad one.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Saturday, November 15, 1997 04:46:08 PM
Message
From: Pam Scruton
Subject: Re(3): Big Bertha Thing 6
To: Tony Lance
Tony Lance,oufcnt2.open.ac.uk writes:
Anything else is riches. Runs under DOS, not windows crash crash,

Ah well, we might be able to add substantially to your volunteer force (but not guaranteed
until we see what is involved) we can offer

Pentium 166 W95 laptop (Husband)
486DX-66 W95 (Me)
386 Dos 6/Win 3.11 (Son)
386 Dos 5/Win 3.11 laptop (Me)
8086 Dos 3/Win 2.1 (Daughter)
8086 Dos 3 up in the loft - but could be set up again if needed.

And my favourite
BBC Master 512 (Z80 co-processor) running Digital Research Dos 2.1 - not sure who has got
that one at the moment - maybe that's what the dog is using now.
Tony Lance
2007-06-15 19:28:33 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing burster
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/gammaray.html
16K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.astro.seti

Gamma Ray Bursters

v1.0
01 feb 2000
Greg Goebel
public domain

Contents List:-
1.THE DISCOVERY OF GRBS
2.PINPOINTING A GRB
3.CAUGHT IN THE ACT
4.COMMENTS, SOURCES, & REVISION HISTORY


Big Bertha Thing publication

The statistics for Big Bertha Thing postings published
on sci.astro are as follows:-

20 No. 50K primary postings (out of 26)
2 No. 600K ditto (out of 4)
12 No. off-topic postings (out of 200)
4 No. 50K secondary postings (out of 26)
20 No. 4K ditto (out of 26)
20 No. 2K ditto (out of 26)
24 No. astronomical postings (out of 2000)

There was almost zero response to the above, which were
spread over 28 days, at the rate of two days per week.

Book-burners deleted the archive of Net Access Policy
postings prior to 2nd November 1998. Bertha saved those,
with the exception of replies and published 12.

The above were also posted to the Onenet conference
Astronomy & Space. Here days 18, 19, 20, were minimal
keep-off-the-grass days and on days 27 and 28 they
broke ranks. The on-topic filibuster of sound-bite
journalism ended, at 42 days old.
(The beginning of the end of spam.)
Thank you,
Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.chem
Subject: Big Bertha Thing strategic
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:46:40 +0000


Big Bertha Thing strategic

Hi there,
Further to your concern on my 70K postings.
There is one posting per day, cross posted to two newgroups.
The contents are the results from my scientific project.
Another field of interest is spam attack strategic studies.
There are two grounds where off-topic postings are considered to be on-topic.
One is a review of off-topic postings, which is linked to below.
The other is postings for the benefit of newsgroup users.
Results of logs of attacks on newsgroup users is also linked to below.
All postings can be filtered using subject big bertha thing.
Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.
Tony Lance


Big Bertha Thing rim

News from the Asian Rim front.
1. The basic mailing list has 2000 mailboxes. (two-way)
2. The rate of increase is 400 mailboxes per 6 weeks.
3. This gives 4000 mailboxes in 8 months time.
4. The 4th Battle of Cyberspace began on 21st October 2002.
5. There are 2000 new Yahoo mailboxes per 6 weeks. (one-way)
6. Each one has a Big Bertha Thing posting inside it.
7. These are not 2000 world-wide.
8. They are not even 2000 in english.
9. They are 2000 Asian Rim non-english.
10. The 8 months target is 10,000 Yahoo mailboxes closed.
11. The Big Bertha Thing web site shows that one field
of interest is spam attack strategic studies.
12. In theory the first three battles were unwinnable too.
13. The targets of all these mailboxes are newsgroup users.
14. Off-topic postings for the benefit of newsgroups are
considered to be on-topic.
15. Shi Tao got 10 years for email about China after Yahoo
named him to them. (see http)
http://www.out-law.com/page-6482

Actual Count of Yahoo mailboxes closed.
08/11/05 2108 smtp
20/12/05 1791 smtp
31/01/06 1587 smtp
08/02/06 Asian Rim posting published.
21/04/06 1258 smtp
13/10/06 263 filtered
21/01/07 90 smtp (new mailbox)

http://www.1-script.com/forums/Re-Big-Bertha-Thing-blogs-article1957-20.htm


Big Bertha Thing corporate

1. What happened to the guys on the most wanted list?
2. Corporate America opened fire with an industrial
strength denial of service attack.
3. It was complete with worm virus.
4. 150K mailbox postings.
5. Daily basis.
6. Unlimited smtp mailboxes and names.
7. Ownership of smtp mailbox provider.
8. This is a proprietorial interest in Usenet newsgroup
postings.
9. Big Bertha is now on the list.
10. A sustainable defense would be nice.
11. When the guns fall silent, the battle will be over.
12. There were enough shells for 42 months, without
recycling.

http://www.codecomments.com/message444377.html


Big Bertha Thing mailbox

Hi there,
To those who understand, no explanation is necessary.
To those who do not understand, no explanation will suffice.


Why rec.autos.sport.nascar?
It is one of 50 newsgroups used by the opposition,
from the 3rd battle of cyberspace. (see reason below.)


The 4th battle of cyberspace answers spam attacks from Asian rim and
denial of service attacks from corporate America, with copies to rec.autos.sport.nascar.
Without copies to rec.autos.sport.nascar, there would be no spam attack or denial of
service attack or even 4th battle of cyberspace. It is a bit like
the chicken and the egg. Which one came first? (See mailbox logs below.)


Did you know that a review listing off-topic postings users' profiles, of
newsgroups used and number of postings sent to each newsgroup,
is on-topic. Also that an off-topic posting on any subject for the benefit
of usenet newsgroups is also on-topic. One of my fields of interest is spam
attack strategic studies. Strange to say but this is also on-topic.
Thank you,
Tony Lance

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.sport.nascar/msg/3989c9f596ca5ca2

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 2007
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing strategic
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:31:03 +0000

So what was the FBI doing, when I was doing their job for them, on all the following
dates?
These are illegal corporate american two-way mailboxes, used to attack newsgroup user
mailboxes.
This case is fully documented, on the link to strategic, as given below.

Two-way Mailbox Activity Log
----------------------------
***@microsoft.net 23/10/04 del
***@confidence.msdn.net o/s 13/11/04 del
***@netmail.net o/s 07/12/04 del
***@newsletters.msn.net o/s 28/12/04 del
***@puremail.net o/s
12/01/05 del
***@aol.com o/s
31/01/05 del
itmpaor-***@newsletters.microsoft.com 23/10/04 13/11/04 04/12/04 15/12/04
03/01/05 22/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 16/04/05 07/06/05 03/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05
10/11/05 10/12/05 08/01/06 01/02/06 04/04/06 14/07/06 05/09/06 29/09/06 23/10/06
15/11/06 08/12/06 01/01/07 25/01/07
***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s
16/04/05 07/06/05 03/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05 10/12/05 08/01/06 01/02/06
04/04/06 14/07/06 05/09/06 29/09/06 23/10/06 15/11/06 08/12/06 01/01/07 25/01/07
***@netmail.com o/s
16/04/05 07/06/05 03/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05 10/12/05 08/01/06 01/02/06
04/04/06 14/07/06 05/09/06 29/09/06 23/10/06 15/11/06 08/12/06 01/01/07 25/01/07
***@netmail.net o/s
07/06/05 del
***@yahoo.com o/s 22/12/04 del
***@rocketmail.net o/s
09/01/05 del
***@freemail.com o/s
24/01/05 del
***@confidence.com o/s 07/12/04 del
***@updates.com o/s 28/12/04 del
***@rocketmail.net o/s
12/01/05 del
***@updates.com o/s
31/01/05 del
***@ms68.hinet.net o/s
19/03/05
***@advisor.net 23/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 13/11/04 04/12/04 18/12/04
06/01/05 24/01/05 09/02/05 10/03/05 16/04/05 14/06/05 06/08/05 01/09/05 18/10/05
12/11/05 14/12/05 11/01/06 04/02/06 12/04/06 01/08/06 07/09/06 02/10/06 25/10/06
17/11/06 11/12/06 03/01/07 27/01/07
***@netmail.com o/s
16/04/05 14/06/05 06/08/05 01/09/05 18/10/05 12/11/05 14/12/05 11/01/06 04/02/06
12/04/06 01/08/06 07/09/06 02/10/06 25/10/06 17/11/06 11/12/06 03/01/07 27/01/07
***@support.microsoft.com o/s
16/04/05 del
***@netmail.com o/s
14/06/05 06/08/05 01/09/05 18/10/05 12/11/05 14/12/05 11/01/06 04/02/06 12/04/06
01/08/06 07/09/06 02/10/06 25/10/06 17/11/06 11/12/06 03/01/07 27/01/07
lhbghyohlomdjx-***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s 22/12/04
09/01/05 24/01/05 09/02/05 10/03/05 25/04/05 24/06/05 07/08/05 08/09/05 22/10/05
17/11/05 15/12/05 14/01/06 07/02/06 22/04/06 07/08/06 11/09/06 04/10/06 27/10/06
20/11/06 13/12/06 05/01/07 30/01/07
***@bulletin.ms.com o/s 07/12/04 del
dstttk-***@updates.msdn.com o/s 28/12/04 del
***@news.msdn.net o/s
12/01/05 del
***@freemail.com o/s
31/01/05 del
gwnfrxvpoawatp-***@updates.com del
***@microsoft.com o/s 23/10/04 del
zxaztdkufrtox-***@confidence.msn.com o/s 13/11/04 del
***@bigfoot.net o/s 07/12/04 del
***@newsletters.com o/s 28/12/04 del
***@puremail.com o/s
12/01/05 del
***@bulletin.msn.com o/s
31/01/05 del
zxvbaqrbxzap-***@news.ms.net 23/10/04 del
***@puremail.com o/s 17/11/04 del
***@confidence.net o/s 07/12/04 del
***@technet.com o/s 28/12/04 del
***@aol.com o/s
15/01/05 del
***@america.com o/s
31/01/05 del
***@technet.com del
zizgvmcl-***@newsletters.msn.com o/s 23/10/04 del
***@freemail.net o/s 17/11/04 del
***@microsoft.com 23/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 17/11/04 04/12/04 18/12/04
06/01/05 24/01/05 09/02/05 10/03/05 25/04/05 14/06/05 06/08/05 08/09/05 18/10/05
12/11/05 14/12/05 12/01/06 04/02/06 17/04/06 05/08/06 08/09/06 03/10/06 25/10/06
18/11/06 12/12/06 04/01/07 29/01/07
***@yahoo.com o/s 22/12/04 del
***@newsletters.msdn.com o/s
06/01/05 del
***@news.net o/s
24/01/05 del
***@newsletters.com o/s
24/01/05 del
***@newsletters.microsoft.com 23/10/04 17/11/04 06/12/04 26/12/04
12/01/05 28/01/05 09/02/05 16/03/05 03/05/05 24/06/05 11/08/05 14/09/05 23/10/05
19/11/05 21/12/05 15/01/06 08/02/06 02/05/06 16/08/06 14/09/06 06/10/06 30/10/06
22/11/06 14/12/06 08/01/07
***@news.com o/s
03/05/05 del
ndlwcexxv-***@newsletters.com o/s
24/06/05 del
eypmlsxtbm-***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s
03/05/05 24/06/05 11/08/05 14/09/05 23/10/05 19/11/05 21/12/05 15/01/06 08/02/06
02/05/06 16/08/06 14/09/06 06/10/06 30/10/06 22/11/06 14/12/06 08/01/07
***@updates.com o/s
24/06/05 del
***@support.msn.com del
***@support.msn.com o/s 23/10/04 del
***@advisor_microsoft.net o/s 17/11/04 del
***@bigfoot.net o/s 11/12/04 del
***@bulletin.net o/s 28/12/04 del
***@bigfoot.com o/s
15/01/05 del
***@newsletters.com 23/10/04 del
***@aol.com o/s 17/11/04 del
***@rocketmail.com o/s 11/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 28/12/04
15/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 19/03/05 07/05/05 14/07/05 17/08/05 22/09/05 28/10/05
26/11/05 28/12/05 19/01/06 15/02/06 29/05/06 22/08/06 18/09/06 11/10/06 04/11/06
27/11/06 20/12/06 12/01/07
***@updates.msdn.net o/s
07/05/05 del
***@puremail.com o/s
07/05/05 del
***@rocketmail.com 23/10/04 del
***@aol.com o/s 17/11/04 del
***@microsoft.com o/s 11/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 28/12/04
15/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 25/03/05 07/05/05 14/07/05 19/08/05 07/10/05 28/10/05
26/11/05 29/12/05 19/01/06 16/02/06 06/06/06 23/08/06 19/09/06 12/10/06 04/11/06
28/11/06 21/12/06 13/01/07
***@yahoo.com 23/10/04 del
***@bigfoot.com o/s 17/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 11/12/04 28/12/04
15/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 25/03/05 07/05/05 14/07/05 19/08/05 07/10/05 28/10/05
26/11/05 29/12/05 19/01/06 16/02/06 06/06/06 23/08/06 19/09/06 12/10/06 04/11/06
28/11/06 21/12/06 13/01/07
***@microsoft.com 26/10/04 del
***@rocketmail.com o/s 17/11/04 del
***@newsletters.microsoft.com 26/10/04 17/11/04 06/12/04 26/12/04
12/01/05 28/01/05 09/02/05 16/03/05 03/05/05 08/07/05 12/08/05 14/09/05 23/10/05
19/11/05 21/12/05 17/01/06 08/02/06 08/05/06 17/08/06 14/09/06 07/10/06 31/10/06
22/11/06 16/12/06 09/01/07
***@aol.net 26/10/04 del
***@puremail.com o/s 17/11/04 del
***@america.net 26/10/04 del
***@freemail.net o/s 17/11/04 del
***@puremail.net o/s 11/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 30/12/04
15/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 25/03/05 18/05/05 15/07/05 19/08/05 09/10/05 30/10/05
27/11/05 31/12/05 20/01/06 21/02/06 12/06/06 24/08/06 20/09/06 13/10/06 06/11/06
29/11/06 22/12/06 15/01/07
***@netmail.net 26/10/04 del
veisdjdtkg-***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s 20/11/04 06/12/04 26/12/04
12/01/05 28/01/05 09/02/05 16/03/05 03/05/05 08/07/05 12/08/05 14/09/05 23/10/05
19/11/05 21/12/05 17/01/06 08/02/06 08/05/06 17/08/06 14/09/06 07/10/06 31/10/06
22/11/06 16/12/06 09/01/07
***@yahoo.com o/s 11/12/04 del
***@technet.com o/s 30/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s
17/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 25/03/05 18/05/05 15/07/05 19/08/05 09/10/05 30/10/05
27/11/05 31/12/05 20/01/06 21/02/06 12/06/06 24/08/06 20/09/06 13/10/06 06/11/06
29/11/06 22/12/06 15/01/07
***@puremail.net 26/10/04 del
***@confidence.msn.com o/s 20/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 11/12/04 30/12/04
17/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 25/03/05 18/05/05 15/07/05 19/08/05 09/10/05 30/10/05
27/11/05 31/12/05 20/01/06 21/02/06 12/06/06 24/08/06 20/09/06 13/10/06 06/11/06
29/11/06 22/12/06 15/01/07
***@puremail.com o/s
18/05/05 del
***@microsoft.com 26/10/04 del
***@aol.com o/s 20/11/04 del
***@updates.com o/s 11/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 30/12/04
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 25/03/05 18/05/05 23/07/05 20/08/05 09/10/05 30/10/05
27/11/05 31/12/05 24/01/06 22/02/06 16/06/06 25/08/06 21/09/06 14/10/06 07/11/06
30/11/06 23/12/06 16/01/07
xjixxqwhdj-***@updates.microsoft.com 26/10/04 del
***@bulletin_msdn.com o/s 20/11/04 del
***@news.ms.com o/s 11/12/04 del
***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s 30/12/04
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 25/03/05 18/05/05 23/07/05 20/08/05 09/10/05 30/10/05
27/11/05 31/12/05 24/01/06 22/02/06 16/06/06 25/08/06 21/09/06 14/10/06 07/11/06
30/11/06 23/12/06 16/01/07
***@technet.net 26/10/04 del
***@bigfoot.com o/s 20/11/04 del
***@yahoo.com o/s 13/12/04 del
***@updates.com o/s 30/12/04 del
***@newsletters.msdn.com o/s
17/01/05 del
cbzvjtkd-***@advisor.net del
***@microsoft.com o/s 26/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 20/11/04 06/12/04 22/12/04
09/01/05 28/01/05 09/02/05 16/03/05 25/04/05 24/06/05 11/08/05 09/09/05 22/10/05
17/11/05 15/12/05 14/01/06 07/02/06 26/04/06 15/08/06 12/09/06 05/10/06 28/10/06
21/11/06 14/12/06 06/01/07
***@updates.com o/s 13/12/04 del
wdqwkmerobf-***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s 30/12/04
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 25/03/05 18/05/05 23/07/05 20/08/05 09/10/05 30/10/05
27/11/05 31/12/05 24/01/06 22/02/06 16/06/06 25/08/06 21/09/06 14/10/06 07/11/06
30/11/06 23/12/06 16/01/07
***@puremail.net o/s
25/03/05 del
***@yahoo.com o/s
18/05/05 23/07/05 del
***@yahoo.com 26/10/04 20/11/04 06/12/04 22/12/04
09/01/05 28/01/05 09/02/05 16/03/05 25/04/05 del
***@america.com o/s
24/06/05 del
***@aol.com o/s
25/04/05 24/06/05 11/08/05 09/09/05 22/10/05 17/11/05 15/12/05 14/01/06 07/02/06
26/04/06 15/08/06 12/09/06 05/10/06 28/10/06 21/11/06 14/12/06 06/01/07
***@netmail.com o/s
24/06/04 11/08/05 09/09/05 22/10/05 17/11/05 15/12/05 14/01/06 07/02/06 26/04/06
15/08/06 12/09/06 05/10/06 28/10/06 21/11/06 14/12/06 06/01/07
hieewc-***@news.msdn.net 26/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 20/11/04 07/12/04 26/12/04
09/01/05 24/01/05 09/02/05 10/03/05 25/04/05 24/06/05 07/08/05 08/09/05 22/10/05
17/11/05 15/12/05 14/01/06 07/02/06 22/04/06 07/08/06 11/09/06 04/10/06 27/10/06
20/11/06 13/12/06 05/01/07 30/01/07
***@technet_msdn.com o/s
25/04/05 del
***@confidence.com o/s
24/06/05 del
***@microsoft.com o/s
07/08/05 del
ikmtfo-***@updates.msn.com o/s
24/06/05 del
yknrog-***@updates.microsoft.net o/s
24/01/05 del
***@microsoft.com o/s 28/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s
15/01/05 31/01/05 09/02/05 19/03/05 03/05/05 08/07/05 16/08/05 15/09/05 24/10/05
22/11/05 23/12/05 17/01/06 11/02/06 16/05/06 18/08/06 17/09/06 09/10/06 01/11/06
24/11/06 18/12/06 10/01/07
gmnrousehnfw-***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s
03/05/05 08/07/05 16/08/05 15/09/05 24/10/05 22/11/05 23/12/05 17/01/06 11/02/06
16/05/06 18/08/06 17/09/06 09/10/06 01/11/06 24/11/06 18/12/06 10/01/07
***@technet.com o/s
03/05/05 del
***@advisor.net o/s
08/07/05 del
***@freemail.net o/s
03/05/05 del
***@aol.com o/s
08/07/05 del
***@bigfoot.net o/s
03/05/05 del
***@netmail.com o/s
08/07/05 16/08/05 15/09/05 24/10/05 22/11/05 23/12/05 17/01/06 11/02/06 16/05/06
18/08/06 17/09/06 09/10/06 01/11/06 24/11/06 18/12/06 10/01/07
***@newsletters.microsoft.com 30/10/04 20/11/04 07/12/04 28/12/04
15/01/05 31/01/05 09/02/05 19/03/05 07/05/05 09/07/05 16/08/05 22/09/05 24/10/05
22/11/05 28/12/05 18/01/06 12/02/06 22/05/06 21/08/06 17/09/06 10/10/06 01/11/06
25/11/06 19/12/06 11/01/07
***@aol.com 30/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 20/11/04 07/12/04 28/12/04
15/01/05 31/01/05 09/02/05 19/03/05 07/05/05 09/07/05 16/08/05 22/09/05 24/10/05
22/11/05 28/12/05 18/01/06 12/02/06 22/05/06 21/08/06 17/09/06 10/10/06 01/11/06
25/11/06 19/12/06 11/01/07
***@bigfoot.com o/s
07/05/05 del
***@bigfoot.com o/s
09/07/05 del
***@microsoft.net o/s
09/07/05 del
***@yahoo.net o/s
09/07/05 del
***@news.com o/s
07/05/05 del
***@bigfoot.com o/s
07/05/05 del
***@support.msdn.net o/s
07/05/05 del
***@puremail.net o/s
19/02/05 del
***@updates.ms.com o/s
19/02/05 del
***@support.ms.com o/s
19/02/05 del
***@netmail.com o/s
19/02/05 19/03/05 07/05/05 14/07/05 17/08/05 22/09/05 28/10/05 26/11/05 28/12/05
19/01/06 15/02/06 29/05/06 22/08/06 18/09/06 11/10/06 04/11/06 27/11/06 20/12/06
12/01/07
***@advisor_msn.com o/s
19/02/05 del
***@technet.msdn.com 30/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 20/11/04 11/12/04 30/12/04
15/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 25/03/05 18/05/05 15/07/05 19/08/05 09/10/05 30/10/05
27/11/05 31/12/05 20/01/06 21/02/06 12/06/06 24/08/06 20/09/06 13/10/06 06/11/06
29/11/06 22/12/06 15/01/07
***@america.net 30/10/04 del
***@yahoo.com o/s 20/11/04 11/12/04 30/12/04
15/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 25/03/05 07/05/05 14/07/05 19/08/05 07/10/05 28/10/05
26/11/05 del
***@netmail.com 30/10/04 27/11/04 11/12/04 30/12/04
15/01/05 09/02/05 19/02/05 25/03/05 07/05/05 14/07/05 19/08/05 07/10/05 28/10/05
26/11/05 29/12/05 19/01/06 16/02/06 06/06/06 23/08/06 19/09/06 12/10/06 04/11/06
28/11/06 21/12/06 13/01/07
***@news.com o/s
25/03/05 del
***@puremail.com o/s
07/05/05 del
***@news.msdn.com o/s
14/07/05 del
***@support.ms.com o/s
07/05/05 del
***@newsletters_ms.com o/s
07/05/05 del
***@microsoft.com 30/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 27/11/04 13/12/04 30/12/04
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 31/03/05 18/05/05 23/07/05 23/08/05 10/10/05 31/10/05
01/12/05 01/01/06 24/01/06 28/02/06 17/06/06 28/08/06 22/09/06 16/10/06 08/11/06
01/12/06 23/12/06 17/01/07
***@discussions.microsoft.com 30/10/04 del
***@ms67.hinet.net o/s 27/11/04 13/12/04 30/12/04
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 31/03/05
***@puremail.com 30/10/04 del
btanjokumbt-***@updates.com o/s 27/11/04 del
***@bigfoot.net 30/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 27/11/04 13/12/04 01/01/05
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 31/03/05 18/05/05 23/07/05 23/08/05 10/10/05 31/10/05
01/12/05 01/01/06 24/01/06 28/02/06 17/06/06 28/08/06 22/09/06 16/10/06 08/11/06
01/12/06 23/12/06 17/01/07
hivdwqaf-***@advisor.ms.com o/s 15/12/04 del
***@support.com o/s 01/01/05 del
***@freemail.net o/s
19/01/05 del
***@yahoo.com 30/10/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 27/11/04 13/12/04 01/01/05
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 31/03/05 18/05/05 23/07/05 23/08/05 10/10/05 31/10/05
01/12/05 01/01/06 24/01/06 28/02/06 17/06/06 28/08/06 22/09/06 16/10/06 08/11/06
01/12/06 23/12/06 17/01/07
***@support.msn.com o/s
10/10/05 del
***@technet.msdn.com o/s
31/03/05 del
ductojwpfeuxw-***@support.com o/s
18/05/05 del
***@america.com o/s
23/07/05 del
***@freemail.com o/s
31/03/05 del
***@news_ms.com o/s
18/05/05 del
mbdypssqdpnhmjg-***@news.ms.com o/s 15/12/04 del
dudbbjklflvm-***@technet.com o/s 01/01/05 del
***@netmail.net o/s
19/01/05 del 28/02/05 del
***@netmail.com o/s
09/04/05 25/05/05 29/07/05 26/08/05 13/10/05 05/11/05 06/12/05 05/01/06 28/01/06
05/03/06 03/07/06 31/08/06 26/09/06 19/10/06 11/11/06 05/12/06 28/12/06 20/01/07
***@aol.com 30/10/04 del
***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s 27/11/04 13/12/04 01/01/05
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 31/03/05 25/05/05 24/07/05 23/08/05 12/10/05 31/10/05
01/12/05 04/01/06 25/01/06 01/03/06 20/06/06 29/08/06 23/09/06 17/10/06 09/11/06
02/12/06 26/12/06 18/01/07
***@america.com o/s 15/12/04 del
kfhfaauymrjgff-***@confidence.msdn.com o/s 01/01/05 del
***@netmail.com o/s
19/01/05 09/02/05 28/02/05 09/04/05 25/05/05 29/07/05 26/08/05 13/10/05 05/11/05
06/12/05 05/01/06 28/01/06 05/03/06 03/07/06 31/08/06 26/09/06 19/10/06 11/11/06
05/12/06 28/12/06 20/01/07
***@microsoft.com 30/10/04 del
dtmpzcm-***@updates.net o/s 27/11/04 del
***@advisor.net del
***@bigfoot.com o/s 2/11/04 27/11/04 del
***@netmail.com 2/11/04 27/11/04 13/12/04 01/01/05
17/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 31/03/05 25/05/05 24/07/05 23/08/05 12/10/05 31/10/05
01/12/05 04/01/06 25/01/06 01/03/06 20/06/06 29/08/06 23/09/06 17/10/06 09/11/06
02/12/06 26/12/06 18/01/07
banslmszfgbsvs-***@confidence.com o/s
12/10/05 del
***@bigfoot.net o/s
12/10/05 del
***@puremail.net 2/11/04 del
***@yahoo.com o/s 27/11/04 13/12/04 01/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 23/02/05 31/03/05 25/05/05 24/07/05 del
***@america.com o/s
31/03/05 del
***@newsletters.com o/s
31/03/05 del
***@advisor.com o/s
25/05/05 del
***@bigfoot.com 2/11/04 del
***@america.com o/s 27/11/04 del
***@microsoft.com 2/11/04 del
***@bigfoot.net o/s 30/11/04 del
***@yahoo.com 2/11/04 del
***@microsoft.com o/s 30/11/04 del
***@aol.net 2/11/04 del
***@microsoft.com o/s 30/11/04 del
***@advisor.net del
***@freemail.net o/s 2/11/04 del
***@america.com o/s 30/11/04 del
***@america.net 2/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 30/11/04 13/12/04 01/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 28/02/05 31/03/05 25/05/05 29/07/05 24/08/05 13/10/05 05/11/05
06/12/05 04/01/06 28/01/06 04/03/06 26/06/06 30/08/06 25/09/06 18/10/06 10/11/06
04/12/06 27/12/06 19/01/07
***@advisor.net o/s 18/12/04 del
***@bulletin.com o/s 03/01/05 del
***@rocketmail.com o/s
22/01/05 del
***@microsoft.com 2/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 30/11/04 13/12/04 01/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 28/02/05 31/03/05 25/05/05 29/07/05 24/08/05 13/10/05 05/11/05
06/12/05 04/01/06 28/01/06 04/03/06 26/06/06 30/08/06 25/09/06 18/10/06 10/11/06
04/12/06 27/12/06 19/01/07
giowwpnv-***@updates.com o/s 18/12/04 del
***@bigfoot.net o/s 03/01/05 del
ekupvqfwkdelp-***@support.net o/s
22/01/05 del
***@netmail.com 2/11/04 30/11/04 13/12/04 01/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 28/02/05 31/03/05 25/05/05 29/07/05 24/08/05 13/10/05 05/11/05
06/12/05 04/01/06 28/01/06 04/03/06 26/06/06 30/08/06 25/09/06 18/10/06 10/11/06
04/12/06 27/12/06 19/01/07
***@rocketmail.net o/s
13/10/05 del
***@puremail.net o/s
31/03/05 del
***@support.microsoft.com o/s
31/03/05 del
***@support.ms.com o/s
19/01/05 del
***@netmail.net o/s 18/12/04 03/01/05 del
***@freemail.net o/s
22/01/05 del
***@puremail.net del
***@rocketmail.com o/s 2/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 30/11/04 15/12/04 01/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 28/02/05 09/04/05 25/05/05 29/07/05 26/08/05 13/10/05 05/11/05
06/12/05 05/01/06 28/01/06 05/03/06 03/07/06 31/08/06 26/09/06 19/10/06 11/11/06
05/12/06 28/12/06 20/01/07
wfpnrwyxhqfuk-***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s
09/04/05 25/05/05 29/07/05 26/08/05 13/10/05 05/11/05 06/12/05 05/01/06 28/01/06
05/03/06 03/07/06 31/08/06 26/09/06 19/10/06 11/11/06 05/12/06 28/12/06 20/01/07
***@updates.com o/s 18/12/04 del
***@puremail.com o/s 03/01/05 del
***@yahoo.com o/s
22/01/05 del
***@bigfoot.com 6/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 30/11/04 15/12/04 03/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 28/02/05 09/04/05 07/06/05 30/07/05 26/08/05 14/10/05 09/11/05
07/12/05 07/01/06 29/01/06 09/03/06 04/07/06 01/09/06 27/09/06 20/10/06 13/11/06
06/12/06 29/12/06 22/01/07
duddrlrntpy-***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s 18/12/04 06/01/05
22/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 16/04/05 07/06/05 03/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05
10/12/05 08/01/06 01/02/06 04/04/06 14/07/06 05/09/06 29/09/06 23/10/06 15/11/06
08/12/06 01/01/07 25/01/07
***@yahoo.com 6/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 30/11/04 15/12/04 03/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 28/02/05 09/04/05 07/06/05 30/07/05 26/08/05 14/10/05 09/11/05
07/12/05 07/01/06 29/01/06 09/03/06 04/07/06 01/09/06 27/09/06 20/10/06 13/11/06
06/12/06 29/12/06 22/01/07
***@newsletters.com o/s 18/12/04 del
***@newsletters.msn.com o/s 06/01/05 del
***@netmail.com o/s
22/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 16/04/05 14/06/05 04/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05
10/12/05 11/01/06 02/02/06 08/04/06 17/07/06 06/09/06 30/09/06 24/10/06 16/11/06
09/12/06 02/01/07 26/01/07
***@microsoft.net 6/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 30/11/04 15/12/04 03/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 28/02/05 09/04/05 07/06/05 30/07/05 26/08/05 14/10/05 09/11/05
07/12/05 07/01/06 29/01/06 09/03/06 04/07/06 01/09/06 27/09/06 20/10/06 13/11/06
06/12/06 29/12/06 22/01/07
aefmip-***@confidence.net o/s
09/04/05 del
***@updates.ms.net o/s
07/06/05 del
***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s
07/06/05 30/07/05 26/08/05 14/10/05 09/11/05 07/12/05 07/01/06 29/01/06 09/03/06
04/07/06 01/09/06 27/09/06 20/10/06 13/11/06 06/12/06 29/12/06 22/01/07
***@netmail.com o/s 18/12/04 06/01/05
22/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 16/04/05 14/06/05 04/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05
10/12/05 11/01/06 02/02/06 09/04/06 17/07/06 06/09/06 30/09/06 24/10/06 16/11/06
09/12/06 02/01/07 26/01/07
***@aol.com 6/11/04 del
***@news.ms.com o/s 30/11/04 del
***@technet.ms.com o/s 18/12/04 del
***@confidence.ms.com o/s 06/01/05 del
***@netmail.com o/s
22/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 16/04/05 14/06/05 04/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05
10/12/05 11/01/06 02/02/06 09/04/06 17/07/06 06/09/06 30/09/06 24/10/06 16/11/06
09/12/06 02/01/07 26/01/07
***@bigfoot.com o/s
16/04/05 14/06/05 04/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05 10/12/05 11/01/06 02/02/06
09/04/06 17/07/06 06/09/06 30/09/06 24/10/06 16/11/06 09/12/06 02/01/07 26/01/07
***@netmail.com o/s
16/04/05 14/06/05 04/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05 10/12/05 11/01/06 02/02/06
09/04/06 17/07/06 06/09/06 30/09/06 24/10/06 16/11/06 09/12/06 02/01/07 26/01/07
jveojluoddaku-***@advisor_ms.com 6/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 04/12/04 15/12/04 03/01/05
19/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 09/04/05 07/06/05 03/08/05 27/08/05 14/10/05 09/11/05
07/12/05 07/01/06 01/02/06 10/03/06 10/07/06 04/09/06 28/09/06 21/10/06 14/11/06
07/12/06 30/12/06 23/01/07
***@netmail.com o/s 18/12/04 06/01/05
24/01/05 09/02/05 10/03/05 16/04/05 14/06/05 06/08/05 01/09/05 18/10/05 12/11/05
14/12/05 11/01/06 04/02/06 12/04/06 01/08/06 07/09/06 02/10/06 25/10/06 17/11/06
11/12/06 03/01/07 27/01/07
***@america.com 6/11/04 del
***@rocketmail.com o/s 04/12/04 del
***@bigfoot.com 6/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 04/12/04 15/12/04 03/01/05
22/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 09/04/05 07/06/05 03/08/05 27/08/05 14/10/05 09/11/05
07/12/05 07/01/06 01/02/06 10/03/06 10/07/06 04/09/06 28/09/06 21/10/06 14/11/06
07/12/06 30/12/06 23/01/07
***@microsoft.com 6/11/04 del
***@america.net o/s 04/12/04 del
***@aol.net 6/11/04 del
***@puremail.com o/s 04/12/04 del
***@bulletin.ms.com o/s 22/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s
06/01/05 24/01/05 09/02/05 10/03/05 25/04/05 14/06/05 06/08/05 08/09/05 18/10/05
12/11/05 14/12/05 12/01/06 04/02/06 17/04/06 05/08/06 08/09/06 03/10/06 25/10/06
18/11/06 12/12/06 04/01/07 29/01/07
***@yahoo.com 6/11/04 del
***@confidence.microsoft.net o/s 04/12/04 del
***@support.microsoft.com o/s 22/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s
06/01/05 24/01/05 09/02/05 10/03/05 25/04/05 14/06/05 06/08/05 08/09/05 18/10/05
12/11/05 14/12/05 12/01/06 04/02/06 17/04/06 05/08/06 08/09/06 03/10/06 25/10/06
18/11/06 12/12/06 04/01/07 29/01/07
***@technet.ms.com o/s
25/04/05 del
***@support.msn.net o/s
14/06/05 del
qqsogqqeb-***@support.com o/s
06/08/05 del
***@netmail.com o/s
25/04/05 14/06/05 06/08/05 08/09/05 18/10/05 12/11/05 14/12/05 12/01/06 04/02/06
17/04/06 05/08/06 08/09/06 03/10/06 25/10/06 18/11/06 12/12/06 04/01/07 29/01/07
***@bigfoot.com 6/11/04 del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@freemail.com 10/11/04 del
***@microsoft.com 10/11/04 del
***@aol.com 10/11/04 del
***@rocketmail.com 10/11/04 del
grxzkbgxmbgosi-***@technet.com o/s del
***@bulletin.msn.com 10/11/04 del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@yahoo.com 10/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 06/12/04 15/12/04 03/01/05
22/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 09/04/05 07/06/05 03/08/05 27/08/05 14/10/05 09/11/05
07/12/05 07/01/06 01/02/06 10/03/06 10/07/06 04/09/06 28/09/06 21/10/06 14/11/06
07/12/06 30/12/06 23/01/07
***@technet.microsoft.com o/s
09/04/05 del
***@puremail.net o/s
07/06/05 del
***@america.com o/s
09/04/05 del
***@bigfoot.com o/s
07/06/05 03/08/05 del
***@freemail.com o/s
07/06/05 del
***@yahoo.com o/s 22/12/04 del
***@rocketmail.com o/s
28/01/05 del
v-***@microsoft.com 10/11/04 del
***@technet.msdn.net o/s 06/12/04 del
zoftsjjgaet-***@technet.com o/s 26/12/04 del
***@news.ms.net o/s 09/01/05
28/01/05 del
***@updates.microsoft.net 10/11/04 del
***@technet.ms.com o/s 06/12/04 del
abhphnrvi-***@technet.com o/s 26/12/04 del
***@puremail.net o/s 09/01/05
28/01/05 del
***@america.com o/s
16/03/05 del
dlauknx-***@confidence_ms.com 10/11/04 del
***@bulletin.ms.com o/s 06/12/04 del
***@yahoo.net o/s 26/12/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s
28/01/05 09/02/05 16/03/05 03/05/05 24/06/05 11/08/05 14/09/05 23/10/05 19/11/05
21/12/05 15/01/06 08/02/06 02/05/06 16/08/06 14/09/06 06/10/06 30/10/06 22/11/06
14/12/06 08/01/07
***@netmail.com o/s
28/01/05 09/02/05 16/03/05 03/05/05 24/06/05 11/08/05 14/09/05 23/10/05 19/11/05
21/12/05 15/01/06 08/02/06 02/05/06 16/08/06 14/09/06 06/10/06 30/10/06 22/11/06
14/12/06 08/01/07
xtywfhbbved-***@news.ms.com del
***@newsletters.microsoft.com o/s 13/11/04 04/12/04 18/12/04
06/01/05 24/01/05 09/02/05 10/03/05 16/04/05 14/06/05 06/08/05 01/09/05 18/10/05
12/11/05 14/12/05 11/01/06 04/02/06 12/04/06 01/08/06 07/09/06 02/10/06 25/10/06
17/11/06 11/12/06 03/01/07 27/01/07
***@yahoo.net del
***@bigfoot.net o/s 13/11/04 del
***@newsletters.msn.com 13/11/04 del
***@microsoft.com 13/11/04 del
sxkjqlc-***@technet.com o/s 07/12/04 del
***@america.com o/s 26/12/04 del
***@yahoo.com o/s
12/01/05 31/01/05 09/02/05 16/03/05 03/05/05 08/07/05 12/08/05 14/09/05 23/10/05
19/11/05 21/12/05 17/01/06 08/02/06 08/05/06 17/08/06 14/09/06 07/10/06 31/10/06
22/11/06 16/12/06 09/01/07
***@support.microsoft.com o/s
03/05/05 del
***@technet.com o/s
08/07/05 del
***@confidence.msn.com o/s
03/05/05 del
***@support_msdn.net o/s
08/07/05 del
***@support.net 13/11/04 del
***@netmail.com o/s 07/12/04 15/12/04 03/01/05
22/01/05 09/02/05 04/03/05 16/04/05 07/06/05 03/08/05 31/08/05 17/10/05 10/11/05
10/12/05 08/01/06 01/02/06 04/04/06 14/07/06 05/09/06 29/09/06 23/10/06 15/11/06
08/12/06 01/01/07 25/01/07
***@puremail.net o/s 26/12/04 del
***@bigfoot.com o/s 12/01/05 del
***@technet_ms.net o/s
31/01/05 del
lttpzjakawz-***@technet.ms.com 13/11/04 del
***@america.com o/s 07/12/04 del
***@bulletin.net o/s 26/12/04 del
***@technet.msn.com o/s 12/01/05 del
***@bulletin.msdn.com o/s
31/01/05 del
***@updates.com 13/11/04 del
***@america.com o/s 07/12/04 del
***@puremail.net o/s del
***@support.microsoft.com o/s del
zpputi-***@newsletters.com o/s del
***@news.microsoft.com o/s del
pnwdilzttafsjxk-***@updates.com o/s del
***@newsletters.com o/s del
***@puremail.net o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@confidence.com o/s del
***@puremail.net o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@advisor.net o/s del
***@technet.microsoft.com o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@advisor.net o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@bulletin.net o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@bulletin.net o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@news.ms.com o/s del
***@news.microsoft.com o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@puremail.net o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@puremail.net o/s del
***@advisor.net o/s del
***@technet.ms.com o/s del
riehpmocxibo-***@technet.microsoft.com o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@confidence.com o/s del
***@support.microsoft.com o/s del
***@confidence.net o/s del
***@aol.com o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@advisor.net o/s del
***@puremail.net o/s del
***@newsletters.com o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
bpgaqavnebojxv-***@advisor.net o/s del
***@support.microsoft.com o/s del
***@support.ms.com o/s del
***@support.msn.com o/s del
***@bulletin.net o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
jpmgaiwvlu-***@confidence.com o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@newsletters.msn.com o/s del
***@newsletters.com o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@rocketmail.net o/s del
***@technet.microsoft.com o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@advisor.ms.com o/s del
hmhyutglpbqehbo-***@newsletters.ms.com o/s del
nkrfoc-***@bulletin.com o/s del
wwdxssoflbtizrv-***@technet.microsoft.com o/s del
***@confidence.com o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@support.msn.com o/s del
nrlhmracvk-***@updates.com o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@technet.microsoft.com o/s del
wwbmkr-***@news.ms.com o/s del
amniiagudzoiiyz-***@newsletters.com o/s del
ghcnkodxjg-***@support.msn.com o/s del
***@newsletters.com o/s del
jpfgbq-***@support.msn.com o/s del
quaasqaqczdezye-***@bulletin.net o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@confidence.net o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
fduecjz-***@updates.com o/s del
***@puremail.com o/s del
vayampkcsxarzw-***@confidence.com o/s del
***@newsletters.com o/s del
***@bulletin.com o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@msnews.microsoft.com o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@confidence.com o/s del
gartuyxzoau-***@technet.com o/s del
***@confidence.net o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@confidence.net o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@rocketmail.com o/s del
***@aol.net o/s del
pucsseslidg-***@bulletin.net o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
afdsgidxyt-***@news.microsoft.com o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
uyfhkjuj-***@technet.com o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
rhmuwnw-***@confidence.net o/s del
***@newsletters.com o/s del
***@news.microsoft.com o/s del
***@netmail.net o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@bulletin.net o/s del
***@advisor.net o/s del
dypcrrxne-***@newsletters.com o/s del
***@confidence.net o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
***@confidence.com o/s del
***@bulletin.net o/s del
***@bulletin.net o/s del
***@rocketmail.net o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
tyseyapcvd-***@confidence.com o/s del
***@rocketmail.net o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@america.com o/s del
***@yahoo.com o/s del
aglkjendtjchjop-***@technet.com o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@advisor.net o/s del
***@updates.com o/s del
wobobxmx-***@support.msn.com o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
hxzdjhojnqrovq-***@technet.com o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@technet.com o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@microsoft.net o/s del
***@newsletters.com o/s del
***@advisor.net o/s
***@freemail.com o/s
***@updates.net o/s
***@yahoo.com o/s

NB.(2007) Addendum to Big Bertha Thing strategic (as deleted by Google) Full
documentation.
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/post-1881133.html
Tony Lance
2007-06-16 17:28:39 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing pastures
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/cricket.html
Access page to 138K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.support.attn-deficit

Worked example of Outlandish Particle Periodic Table in Structure Order,
complete with programs, source code in listing format and documentation.

Pastures Software Package.
(Particle Structure Results Program, in Fortran 77.)
Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System.
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing cricket

The Rules of Cricket
by Tony Lance

1. 1st side goes in till all out. (10 out of 11)
2nd side goes in till all out.
1st side wins.
Exceptions;-
i Rain stops play is draw.
ii 2nd side scores more, game stops they win.
iii Equal final scores are a draw.

2. Every run counts one.
Exceptions;-
i A no runs boundary hit counts 4.
ii A no runs clean over boundary hit counts 6.
iii A no hit too wide counts 1.
iv A no hit boundary counts 4.
v A no hit over boundary counts 6. (missing rule)
vi A no hit can still be run.

3. Caught out or bowled out. (owzat!)
Exceptions;-
i Stumped out.
ii Run out.
iii Thrown out.
iv Trod on wicket.
v Retired injured.

Exception to all of above.
Runner for slightly injured.


Street Cricket

Forget all the exceptions and rules 1 and 2.
Equipment;-
i Cut out bat.
ii Rubber ball.
iii Piece of chalk.

Owner of bat goes first.
Owner of ball goes first.
Fielder bowls next.
Bowled out, bowler bats.
Caught out, catcher bats and swaps bat for ball.
The end
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 2000
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing warlord
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:21:24 +0000

Saturday, November 15, 1997 12:40:38 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Re(2): Fwd(3): Outlandish Request for Volunteers
To: Carol Yeats
Cc: Rick Holyomes
George Ho-Yow
FC Mods Discussion
Philip Sims
Big Bertha Thing 6(with apologies for use of CTRL R)

Please accept my apologies for troubling you. It will not of course be repeated.
However 3 mods have responded to my call to help out on the Conf. by volunteering.
In emergency situations, needs must. You and your fellow mods number 3 I see.
Mods have broad shoulders and thick skins and I trust compassion.
Thank you,
Tony Lance.


Big Bertha Thing 7

By way of light relief, a similar general apology, to the one
above, would bring solace and comfort, to the victims of such
well intentioned postings. Please put it in a Big Bertha and
address to CP Conf., Mods Conf. and Philip Sims. That of course,
would be the end of spam.
Tony Lance
2007-06-17 17:14:18 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing gamma
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/gamma.html
Access page JPG 81K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews inluding alt.sci.planetary

Round photographic plates.

Caption;-
A photograph of the tracks of electrons,
ejected by the gamma rays from radium,
after these had been filtered, through 2.5 cm. of steel.
Some of the electrons have energies of 1 MeV.
The photograph was taken, with a magnetic field of 12,000 oersteds.

From a book by
J.D.Stranathan Ph.D.,
Professor of Physics and Chairman of
Department, University of Kansas.
The "Particles" of Modern Physics.
(C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942

Big Bertha Thing effort

If you see someone slogging away, but doing it all wrong.
Please remember, a great effort, with no results,
is worth more than a great result with no effort.
The first is purchased at great cost and the latter,
in terms of cost, is worthless.

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997.
To comply with my copyright,
please distribute complete and free of charge.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing warlord
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:13:15 +0000


Sunday, November 16, 1997 04:39:18 PM
Message
From: Mansour Abou Jaoudy
Subject: Re: Fwd: Big Bertha Thing 5
To: Tony Lance
Hiya Tony

There are some questions about what do you mean by the postings of "big bertha thing"
thread.
people are confused (me too). it will be nice if you could explain,
before they put you in fire ;-))

take care
Mansour
Tony Lance
2007-06-18 17:58:16 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing pin-wheel
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/pinwheel.html
Access page JPG 17K Image
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including talk.politics.guns

Detail from frontspiece painting showing,
so called pin-wheel rickshaw

Caption;-
A Chinese Street

From the book
The World and Its People
Asia With Special Reference to British Possessions
Published by Thomas Nelson and Sons 1903
Without Author or Editor Name
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Big Bertha Thing china

There is an old chinese curse,
which goes "Live in interesting times."
In which times, they used to get their heads chopped off.
They used to go around saying
"Thats not so good, thats not so funny or thats not so interesting."

There was a nation of them, now some 1 billion strong.
There are even bigger numbers in OUSA Classical Particle Conf.,
such as 227879226 photons in an electron.
Every one should have one.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Sunday, November 16, 1997 05:19:05 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Re(2): Fwd: Big Bertha Thing 5
To: FC Mods Discussion
First Big Bertha posting was to first aid tent in CP Conf. to provide aid and comfort to
victims who had been set upon by unnamed thugs. There was no way to make direct contact,
with shell shocked victims. The trick worked and first victim is well again.
Since then she has developed a life of her own and actually caught some thugs in the act.
Children will be children. The full set of Big Bertha can be found on CP Conf.
Thank you,
Tony Lance
Tony Lance
2007-06-19 18:02:47 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing tidings
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/tidings.html
Access page for 4K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including de.sci.physik

Tidings of the battle of Lens

From the book
Twenty Years After
by Alexandre Dumas
Published by George G.Harrup & Co.Ltd., 1923
Reprinted 1929
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing nation

In "A Town Like Alice" by Nevil Shute the heroine has to ride
forty miles through the "wet", at her first time on a horse,
to save someones life. She does it and ends up in hospital,
OK but unable to sit down for a week. Her fiancee gets told
"Thats some Sheila that you have got there mate."

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Big Bertha Thing testament
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:09:11 +0000


Big Bertha Thing testament

New Testament Rosary

1. The Angel Tells of the Virgin Birth.
2. The Blessing of John the Baptist in the Womb by the Unborn Christ.(13 weeks)
3. The Birth of Our Lord.
4. The Purification of Our Lady and the Presentation of Our Lord.
5. The Finding in the Temple.
6. The Baptism of Our Lord in the Jordan. (Luke 3)
7. The Wedding at Cana. (John 2)
8. The New Covenant Doctrines of Christ From the Sermon of the Mount. (Matthew 5, 6, 7)
9. The Transfiguration of Christ with Moses and Elias. (Matthew 17)
10. The Last Supper. (Matthew 26)
11. The Agony in the Garden.
12. The Scourging at the Pilar.
13. The Crowning With Thorns.
14. The Carrying of the Cross.
15. The Crucifixion.
16. The Resurrection.
17. The Ascension into Heaven.
18. The Coming Down of the Holy Ghost.
19. The Assumption into Heaven.
20. The Crowning of Our Lady Queen of Heaven.
(1st five Joyfull, 2nd five Luminous, 3rd five Sorrowful, 4th five Glorious.)

Old Testament Rosary
by Tony Lance

1. The Promise of Hannah. (I Kings 1) Birth of Samuel.
2. The Three Angels Visit Abraham. (Genesis 18) Birth of Isaac.
3. The Betrothal of Ruth. (Ruth 3) Stranger and great-grandmother of David.
4. The Offering up of Isaac by Abraham. (Genesis 22)
5. The Finding of Joseph in Egypt by Jacob. (Genesis 46)
6. The Saving of Moses From the Bullrushes. (Exodus 2)
7. The Feast in the Temple for the Rechabites. (Jeremias 35)
8. The Covenant of Moses on Mount Sinai. (Exodus 19)
9. The Forty Day Walk of Elias. (III Kings 19)
10. The Writing on the Wall. (Daniel 5) The Fall of Empires.
11. The Water Dungeon of Jeremias. (Jeremias 38) The Babylonian Transmigration for 70
years.
12. The Deriding of David by the Kinsman of Saul. (II Kings 16) The Fall of Jerusalem.
13. The Robing of Mordecai as a King. (Esther 6) From Death Row to First Minister.
14. The Ark is Carried for Forty Years. (Numbers 14) The Entry into the Promised Land.
15. The Execution of Jonah. (Jonah 1) The City of Nineveh Wears Sackcloth and Ashes.
16. The Raising to Life by the Tomb of Eleusius. (IV Kings 13)
17. The Taking up of Elias in the Fiery Chariot. (IV Kings 2)
18. The Spirit of Moses Comes Down on the Judges. (Numbers 11) The Law of Precident Cases.
19. The Slaying of Holofernes by Judith. (Judith 13) The Treasure to the 12 tribes.
20. The Crowning of Esther Queen of Susan. (Esther 2) The Decree of Pogrom is reversed.

Rosary Intentions for each decade of St. Louis Marie de Montfort
Luminous Mysteries by Tony Lance

Lord through thy Holy Mother that we may:-
1. know true humility.
2. have charity one for another.
3. love poverty.
4. have purity of body and soul.
5. obtain Divine Wisdom.
6. be free from Original Sin.(Wet head saying 'I baptise you in the name of the
Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Amen')
7. give grace one to another.
8. enlighten one another.
9. obtain Union with Christ.(3 Nights of Soul) St.John of the Cross
Battle vices and deny 5 physical senses.
(Pictures, icons and Rock and Roll.)
Battle ghosts of old vices and deny spiritual senses.
(Old sins plague you for second time.) Visions, Locutions and tears.
All else gone except the love of God.
(Last of all the memory is perfected. It gets worse first.)
10. break bread together.
11. have perfect contrition.
12. know mortification.
13. have contempt for the world.
14. have patience in crosses.
15. obtain repentance for sinners, perserverance in grace for the just and relief for the
Holy Souls in Purgatory.
16. love thee and be fervent in they service.
17. love Heaven our true home.
18. have the True Devotion to Her.(Sign Prayer of Thanksgiving from Ecclesiasticus 51.)
Annual Preparation. 12 days seek Contempt for World, 6 days each know self, Mary and
Christ.
19. know the Holy Ghost.
20. obtain perserverance in grace for the just and the crown of Heavenly Glory.

NB. Douai-Rheims cross reference links.
The Sermon on the Mount.
Mark 1,14:15
Matthew 4,12:17
Matthew 5,3
Luke 6,20

NB. Parallels between old and new testament rosary event readings.
They had no wine, yet drank it.
Others had wine and drank not.
One was crowned with thorns and crucified.
Another robed as a king and decreed to hang.
One was scourged at the pillar.
Another derided at the head of a whole column of soldiers.
One was found with the wise men.
Another was found, as the wisest man in Egypt.
Elizabeth and Rachel were barren and both bore child.
One was crucified. and descended into Hell (Limbo), for three days.
Another walked the plank and was swallowed by a whale, for three days.
One was born in a stable.
Another betrothed in a barn.
One was crowned Queen of Heaven.
Another crowned Queen of an empire.
One rose up into Heaven.
Another was taken up in a fiery chariot.
One was baptised in the Jordan.
Another was saved from the bullrushes.
That is 10 out of 20 direct parallels.
The other 10 are more nuanced, but who can tell?

NB. The Original Divine Office of the Church was Simply to Read Book Of Psalms Once a
Week.
(Divisions into days and hours can be the 15 minute segments as follows.) 3 by 7
Each psalm is followed by the prayer. Glory by to the Father and to the Son and to the
Holy Ghost, as it was in the beggining, is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.
1-9 10-17 18-24 (25-32 33-37 38-44) 45-53 54-60 61-67 (68-72 73-77 78-84)
85-89 90-98 99-104 (105-109 110-117 118-118) 119-131 132-139 140-150

NB. On meditation and contemplation.
You have to dig the field before you can watch the flowers grow. Both are problem solving.

Dread Visions Six Harms
By Tony Lance
(Based on the writings of St.John of the Cross; the Mystic Doctor of the Church.)

Faith fails, replaced by a vision sensible.
What we see is more real, than God invisible.
Visions turn the spirit from its flight Heavenward.
Had Mary Magdallen touched the feet of the Lord.

Then grounded in faith, would she never be.
How can we hold this vision dearer than Thee.
In nakedness of spirit, hold ourselves renouncible.
Grace fails, imperceptible forsaken for perceptible.

The gift becomes a right, which denies the gift.
Decide the vision not from God, with Satan left.
Seeking after visions is a sinfull occasion.
Turning into diabolical, that divine vision.

With the Devil disguised, as an angel of light,
And man too ignorant, to even take fright.
Grace cannot be rejected; into the soul infused.
The taint of evil can be rejected, by vision refused.
Tony Lance
2007-06-20 18:32:58 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing uniform
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs.
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/uniform.html
Access page to 714K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.support.attn-deficit

Animated wire-frame Polyhedron display,
complete with duals and double precision
angles to the polygons. Also technical
program description and 75 pictures.

Just one thing, thats still outstanding.
This is a collection of PostScript files from
the Computing Science Technical Report series
of organization 1127 of AT&T Bell Laboratories
report Comp. Sci. Tech. Rep. No. 130
author Andrew Hume
title Exact Descriptions of Regular
and Semi-Regular Polyhedra and Their Duals
date November 1986
tm TM 11276-861022-09
type techreport

Just two programs ready to run.
1. kaleido.exe (MSDOS) 86KB (see Zip)
2. schwarz.exe (MSDOS) 27KB (see Zip)

Just one description of two programs,
that do just one thing, better than the next best thing.
uniform.pdf (Adobe) 676KB (see Zip)


Big Bertha Thing windows

On the Windows of King's College Remaining Boarded.

Loquitur Discipulus Esuriens.

Professors, in your plan there seems
A something not quite right,
'Tis queer to cherish learning's beams,
By shutting out the light.

While thus we see your windows block'd,
If nobody complains;
Yet everybody must be shock'd,
To see you don't take pains.

And tell me why should bodily
Succumb to mental meat?
Or why should eta, beta, pi,
Be all the pie we eat?

No helluo liborum I,
No literary glutton,
Would veal with Virgil like to try,
With metaphysics, mutton.

Leave us no longer in the lurch,
With Romans, Greeks, and Hindoos;
But give us beef as well as birch,
And board us - not your windows.


From the book
The Ingoldsby Legends
by the Rev. Richard H. Barham
Published by Richard Edward King,
88 Curtain Road,
London E.C.
Inscribed;-
Barbara Death
From Aunt Emma
March 6th 1921

Thank you,
Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing mayor
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:23:16 +0000


17 February 1998 19:47:02
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Group and Pip
To: group
Cc: Philip Sims
gary.s Cresswell
I keep hearing people disavowing membership of the group.
All group members, except those in First Aid Tent, were
volunteers who have not resigned.
Everyone, including First Aid Tent members, have never
dissented to group postings till now.
The only unexplained event is membership of the First Aid Tent.

Big Bertha Thing pip

Guilty as charged. I should not have done any of the following;-
1. defended you in the mods conf.
2. given you an invitation, when the dogs were at the door.
3. offered a refuge for the explosion survivors.
4. ticked off the mods.
5. put your name up in lights on OUSA Astronomy and Astronomy
and Space.
6. Put back the release of my software package, just because
of the troubles.

Personally I would take me out and shoot me, there is no punishment
too bad for any mod, who gets even one complaint. We should be
above reproach, like Caesers' wife.

I will of course remove the words 'Extract to explain the project
to Philip Sims' from all further postings.

Please accept my appologies for all the bad things I did before
your elevation to mod. I only pick on little people.

Thank you,
Tony Lance

End of Big Bertha Thing pip
Tony Lance
2007-06-21 17:59:27 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing Battle
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/battle.html
Access page to 600K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including misc.health.aids

301 files from the first battle of cyberspace.

Big Bertha Thing Battle

1. Do not fight.
2. Fight on ground of your own choosing.
3. Make sure you have got an edge.
4. Is it worth dying for?

Spam stands for:-
Spleen
Paucity
Artless
Monosylabic

It includes newbies, spammers, spam busters and even
sometimes victim support. The only good spam is branded spam,
which is more Sesame Street than Darth Vader.

To the victor the spoils, of the 1st Battle of Cyberspace.
(20 family jewels and the 301 files.)

This has been a serious exercise, under the auspices
of the Pastures project, OUSA Classical Particle,
in conjunction with OUSA Research.
Thank you,
Tony Lance


Big Bertha Thing farm

From Bibliography of Pastures.(Optional)
The preface from
An Elementary Treatment of Gyroscopes and Similar Spinning Tops
by Crabtree 1909

Classic Cartoon and animated cartoon of
Animal Farm
by George Orwell

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing mayor
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:34:45 +0000


Tuesday, November 18, 1997 04:12:46 PM
Message
From: Pam Scruton
Subject: Re: archivist
To: Tony Lance
Hi Tony
++++++

I'm afraid you are going to have to take me through all this very slowly - I did say my
last Physics was A level some 30+ years ago didn't I?


In answer to your question, yes I'm happy to be archivist - my 486 'boasts' a reasonable
amount of hard disk space and I could allocate about 500MB to the job with as many backup
100MB floppies (on a zip drive) as is necessary. I'm a bit puzzled about the email and
password bit - do you mean that I should log on as AML34 with your password and download
your mail and files? I'm not terribly comfortable with that idea - I would much rather
you forward the relevant messages and attachments to me rather than I should find myself
reading all your mail.

Or perhaps it might be better to set up a closed subconference, one that can only be
accessed by your volunteers and I would get archive the files from there.

Or you can ask people to copy them to me or mail them to me directly.

Have a think and let me know - I would rather not mess around with your mailbox - I'm
pretty sure it's against the rules anyway!

Next
++++
I have downloaded and run the Pastures software and there are lots of things I don't
understand (probably because I don't exactly understand the physics - and I'm not even
going to try to do that right now - although I think I understand what your goal is).
First thing I didn't understand was why working through the Worked Example for Option 1 -
the seven-hour bit took my machine about 20 minutes. So either I'm missing something
fairly fundamental or there is a much bigger speed differential between a 386 and a
486DX-66 than I would have thought!

Then as Option 4 in the Worked example was next, I tried that, but it didn't work -
presumably because it shouldn't be next, it should be after Option 3?

When you refer to 'Edit particle.dat' are you referring to the Dos Edit command or are you
using the term Edit more loosely than that?

Anyway, having made a miserable attempt at running the examples I decided that I really
need my hand held on this one. I'm afraid that perhaps your documentation steps just
aren't quite small enough for me. Would it be too much trouble to go over it again at
half speed? If it would and I can't be of much help to you running the damn thing, I will
still happily act as archivist because I am now quite intrigued by it all!

Cheers for now

Pam
PS I don't understand your Big Bertha messages either - and I've heard of Serpico, there
was a not very good film made about the case a few years ago that has been doing the
rounds on Sky.
PPS: Did you ever get Philip Sims on board? You certainly managed to alienate a few mods
though didn't you? <<<Grin>>>

Cheers once more
Pam
Tony Lance
2007-06-22 17:54:36 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing astronomy
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/astro.html
Access page to 600K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.astro.amateur

Postings potentially suitable for fowarding to SRF Classical Astronomy

OUSA Research moderator gone missing
OUSA Astrology moderator gone missing
NOUS VOUS downgraded to OUSA VOUS
C-in-C winning side 1st and 2nd battles of cyberspace,
not yet reinstated.
Vice-chancellors heads should roll.


Big Bertha Thing ME

There is no test for ME, no diagnosis.
It is just a process of elimination.
So a doctor, who does not believe
Is just as right as one who does.
Where does this leave the hot and tired,
Pole-axed, without a leg to stand on victim?
The incidental pain of disbelief
Is compounded by the length of the chain.
Each link forged by an unshakeable lack.
Cigarettes were once not linked to cancer.
CJD was not linked to mad cows.
Crack nicotine cigarettes not branded by makers.
Pity the child taken into care for being ill.
A taxi used less and less cannot be justified.
Cancel a taxi because there are no medical grounds.
Attendance at school is purely subjective,
It depends on how the child feels getting up.
A medical note can improve exam marks.
DHSS guidelines believe in ME, at last!

Complex numbers can solve all the roots of polynomials to N powers.
Collapse numbers can count all the polka dots on any polygon exactly.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


01 June 1998 13:19:20
Message
From: Mansour Abou Jaoudy
Subject: Confused was Re: Big Bertha Thing repairs
To: Tony Lance
Cc: George Ho-Yow
OUSA Controller
group
Hi Tony (& all)

I haven't been much on line for some time, I come here to see loads of B.B.T. stuff in my
mail box which i got no clue what to do with it.

Is this a kind of joke taking so long. I recall some time ago couple of people wanted to
be off the list but some how i still see their names on mmmmmm I see some light now ah no
don't worry that is the monitor ON ;o)

what makes me wonder, i see the OUSA Controller on the list, mmmmm i am sure she/he/they
got something more important to do, or am i wrong.

that leavs me with 3 options:

a) This is all a joke and i just did not get it.
b) This is some kind of a test to see how much mentally are we prepaired to take.
c) You playing with fire.

Now if it is "a" it is taking too long and people are getting upset (I myself one of them)
I hope it is not "b", I re-checked your resume and you seem to me not the person who will
do such a thing. you more into computers right.
that leaves "c", well what shell i say, maybe we are lucky you got a 386 PC and not a PII
300 :o))

There is a conference about Programming and programmers, why don't you come by and share
with us your expereince in this field, you seem you got lots of it and will be of good
help. I have to say i am the mod of that conference but have not been there for more than
3 months, i feel like a stranger now ;o))

I have included every one in my reply (although i don't know who are the "group" ) and
will try to keep it for this time only.

I read your message about internet and did not know in which conference to reply to, well
it sounds good. as i said it SOUNDS. my advice never trust anything free, specialy on the
net. they have here some kind of a free telephone they say it costs you nothing and you
can speak as much as you want, BUT while you are in conversation, every 2 minutes you get
an advirt and you have to press a key for yes/no if you press the wrong key by misstake
you might bet something home of ƒ100 which you don't want at all.

now my interesting part of the reply, The Internet ;o) here in Holland they will have
access at the end of this year through the tv cable. and Holland is the best country in
that way, since every single house got a tv cable that is handled by the cityhall. and
they said the speed will be more than 10 times an ISDN line. now that is something
interesting.

OK enought talking now, back to work ;o)

take care

and keep your fingers off the fire

Mansour
Tony Lance
2007-06-23 17:16:06 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing progress
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/progress.html
Access page to 6K Web page
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.transport

The Progress of Discontent

by T. Warton
(Written at Oxford in 1746)

From the book
Half-hours With the Best Authors
The "Chandos Classics"
Edited by Charles Knight
Published by Frederick Warne and Co. 1890


Big Bertha Thing besides

Some people think that Big Bertha is less suitable for the
OUSA Astronomy Conf., than for OUSA Classical Particle Conf.
Have they heard the long name for CP Conf?

High Energy Particle Physics Rock Hard Science With a Fringe
Perspective.

They think that is a better place to put Big Bertha.
They must be besides themselves, which proves the thing.

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
To comply with my copyright,
please distribute complete and free of charge.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem
Subject: Big Bertha Thing unified
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:00:24 +0000


INTRODUCTORY LETTER

One of the first things I did was invent a new kind of clock, a so called perfect clock.
One whose period does not vary with motion. Actually I did not invent it. Its construction
has been known for years but I am the first one to actually use it as a clock, to obtain
scientific results using such a clock. As you know many advancements in science have
accompanied advancements in time keeping. Using such a clock it is possible to obtain
varying velocities for the speed of light. Therefore using such a clock it is possible to
invalidate Einsteins 2nd postulate, that the speed of light is constant. By doing this it
is possible to develop a alternative physics. Unfortunately this physics is almost
identical to Newtonian physics so there are no new developments from this analysis. But it
is a valid Physics not just a approximation. There are two valid physics now Newtonian and
Einsteinian.

The weakest part of my theory is the first theorem. That time equals motion. This is
because it is a assumed premise. I tried to give it as much justification for it as I
could but I could not prove it. All great theories have to start with a assumed premise.
As far as I know there is no proof for such theorems as "A body in motion remains in
motion..." or for the notion that all motion is relative. You just have to start off with
a assumed premise, that's just the way it is. I feel mine is not too egregious. Therefore
stay with me though this weak part of my work, please do not dismiss it to quickly or out
of hand. It is the results of this premise that give credence to it.

By beginning with this premise I was able to determine what time is, what motion is, what
space is, how gravity works including how all the forces work, that space and time are
both forms of energy and subject to the laws of particle physics , determine the arrow of
time, determine why the speed of light always appears to us to be constant, unify not only
Newtonian and Einsteinian physics but also relativity and quantum physics and stumble apon
a new law for physics.

yours truly Sidereus Nuncius

RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM PHYSICS


The unification of
Quantum
and relativity theory


by Sidereus Nuncius
From: ***@aol.com (NHol310053)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics
Subject: What Time Is (I to IV)
Date: 18 Sep 1999


Contents List:-
1.Devotion
2.Dedication
3.Abstract
4.Introduction
5.Theory of Time
6.Theory of Space
7.Theory of Motion
8.Relativistic Quantum Physics

1. DEVOTION

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The Earth was without form and
void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the spirit of God moved upon the
face of the waters. Then God said "Let there be light." And there was light. And God saw
the light that it was good. And God divided the light from the darkness. God called the
light day, and the darkness he called night.
So the evening and the morning were the first day.
-Holy Christian Bible

Lion of Judah,
God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Brilliant Morning Star, Lamb of God, King of Kings, Lord
of Lords, Word of God, the All Sovereign, God Almighty, the Great I AM!
The God of Heaven and Earth.

Blessed be the name of the Lord who was, who is, and who is to come. Worthy are You O'
Lord to receive honor, glory and blessing because You and You alone have created all
things. By Your will they were created, and have been created and without You nothing that
was created would exist. Before time You laid the foundations of the Earth. The heavens
declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His Handiwork. The Earth is the Lord's
,and all its fullness.

Day until day utters speech and night until night reveals knowledge. The word of the Lord
is right, and all His work is done in truth. By the word of the Lord the heavens were made
and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth. The voice of the Lord is powerful,
the voice of the Lord is full of wisdom, Teach me Your ways O'Lord, do not be silent to
me, to the end that my glory may sing praise to you.
2. DEDICATION
This book must be dedicated to the two blessed patron saints of science Whose generosity
has enabled this endeavor:

To my mother
and
maternal grandmother.

Science owes them a great debt. And so do I.

3. ABSTRACT

THE RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM HYPOTHESES:

That A L L the phenomena of nature as we know it, i.e., mass, energy, space, time, motion,
etc... are the effects of subatomic particle exchanges. That for each and every physical
manifestation there is a associated particle and for every particle there is a physical
manifestation. All causes are particle causes and without a particle there is neither
cause nor sensation. We only experience what we come directly in contact with. (Action by
contact) Reality, the physical universe, is the sum total of our experience of the
particles we receive. No particle - no experience. We experience particles and that is
all. Subatomic particles are the cause of all are physical experiences and without them we
have no physical experiences. That all experience of phenomenon is quantified the
experience is discrete because the cause is discrete. No particle no experience no
experience no particle. The universe stimulates our senses one particle at a time.

4. INTRODUCTION

To be able to advance the relativistic quantum hypophysis one thing must be done -
associate with every phenomenon a particle or series of particles. There are several
immediate difficulties here. One, there are as many phenomenons are there are experiences,
millions of them. Which experiences go with which particles or series of particles? Also
all particles are probably not known so any analysis will be incomplete at this time. The
most logical course of action is to create a category of fundamental phenomenon, associate
particles to these and then derive complex phenomenon from a fundamental analysis.

The most basic fundamental units of physics seem to me to be:
(I) mass
(II) energy
(III) space
(IV) time

At any rate if the relativistic quantum hypophysis can be demonstrate for these it is a
sufficient start.
Quantification type theories already exist for matter and energy are well established and
accepted by all. For matter the theory is called Atomic theory or Atomism and was
discovered by Leucippus and Democritus. The theory basically attests to the fact that
matter is little particles. For energy the theory is called Quantification Theory and was
discovered by Max Planks. Energy has the same characteristic as mass of being quantized or
existing as separate particles. Therefore we can pass over both mass and energy in
considering the relativistic quantum hypophysis by granting that the hypophysis has
already been demonstrate for these two quantities.

Further I feel it is only required that equivalence to either mass or energy be
demonstrate to assume a quantity must exist quantified. By equivalence I mean
transformation either in theory or in practice. By the first law of thermodynamics there
can be no fractions left over for this would mean loss.

This only leaves space and time to be demonstrated.

Not only is there no quantum theory of space and time there is no theory whatsoever as to
the cause of their generation. From whence comes space? From whence comes time? There has
never been a adequate theory as to the nature of space and time. As to the properties of
space and time some were discovered and only recently by Einstein. But wherever a property
arises we know some relation, some connection, must exist, IE, physical connection, so
that one quantity, like time, can be depended on another quantity, in this case motion.
Otherwise how is it dependent? Every property must have a cause. (Principle of Cause and
Effect) It should be obvious that these connections require some particle, (action by
contact) or some force (action at a distance) to operate. We presently have no other
option unless it waits to be discovered.

From such considerations it is possible to develop both a theory of time and a theory of
space. Theories that are homogeneous to quantum physics and a quantum universe. A space
and time that are materials, physical quantities, quantum, quantified, just like mass and
energy. With materialization of space and time it is easy to demonstrate quantum
properties for these materials exactly has been done for the other constituents of the
universe. Time and space become material and quantified. Space particles, time particles!
Then time and space can come under the province of quantum mechanics and elementary
particle physics and obey quantum mechanical laws and the laws of elementary physics like
any other particles. Space or its particles becomes a subject of elementary particle
physics! Time becomes a subject of elementary particle physics! This is a extraordinary
implication in physical science. Once these facts are uncovered a new science unfolds,
almost trivially. The science that I call Relativistic Quantum Physics.

5. THEORY OF TIME

"Because mathematicians frequently make use of time they ought to have a distinct idea of
what time is, otherwise they are quacks..."
Issac Barrow

PREFACE

What is time? What physical influence generates the phenomena of time? Where does time
come from and where is time going? Is it everywhere? Or only in spots? Is it a physical
quantity or merely a psychological manifestation? If it is physical can it be defined? Or
is it too fundamental a notion?
At first impression time appears to be a simple, reasonable, self explanatory,
uncomplicated and unbelieving notion. But try to analyze time, define it, explain it, and
the simple, reasonable, self explanatory, uncomplicated and unbelieving notion of time
vanishes.
To quote St. Augustine (354 AD-430 AD) , "What is time? If someone asks me, I know; But
ask me to explain, I know not." Time is such a hard concept to appreciate because time is
a completely abstract quantity, it does not have weight, it can not be felt, it has no
heft, you cannot hold it in your hand, you cannot examine it, there is nothing to
experiment on, nothing to analyze. In short time has no corporal body, it is a wholly
intangible, impalpable medium. Neither does it have a place of existence, it is not up, it
is not down, it is not over, it is not under, it is not here, it is not there, time does
not seem to be anywhere. Time is not in a place, we seem to be in time. Time envelopes us.
Time just seems to be.
Mass and distance are much more concrete subjects. Mass has weight, it can be felt, it has
heft, you can hold it in your hand, you can examine it, there is something to experiment
on, something to analyze. It has a corporal body, it is a wholly tangible, palpable
medium. It does have a place of existence, it is either here or it is there. Mass can be
directly appreciated. While space cannot be directly experienced as mass can distance can
be seen, we see space, it is all around us, we see the distances between things, every
distance has a place, distances can be marked off, they can be walked; if necessary space
itself can be enclosed in a box and taken from place to place as it were.
Yet it is neither space nor mass that stimulates our imaginations the most as does time.
Time is the great healer, time marches on, time and tide wait for no man, time is money,
you cannot beat time, time is fleeting, time slips away, time is catching up with
you...For such a ubiquitous concept you would think it would be well defined and the
underlying physical stimulus well comprehended.

Time is and always has been a critical concept in every branch of learning and in all
human affairs. Time crops up in ventrally every aspect of human thought. There have been
two great schools of thought who have debated the genesis of time, philosophy and science.
Because of the ethereal nature of time time has for along time been the province of
philosophy more than science. Time is incorporeal, immaterial and intangible. Time is a
quite abstract concept. And abstract concepts lend themselves to philosophical debate.
Philosophy has speculated about time from everything that it does not exist, (ignore the
problem and it will go away) to it being a disturbance of the middle ear! Science has done
no better.

Indeed time was supposed to be only a abstract concept, but the chief reason is that
science has long been almost completely ignorant of time and its genesis Scientist are
split as to what time really is, some of the better speculations being:

Time is a primitive undefined notion and as such can never be defined. Anymore than mass
or space can be defined, it simply is. Time is the result of the peculiar initial
conditions from which the universe started. It started with high entropy and is
transforming to a condition of low entropy. Time becomes the subjective experience of this
shift from order to randomness. Time (its sensation) is not actually a physical quantity
but a psychological aberration brought on by macroscopic properties of matter. Science has
decided that although not understanding how time operated that it is a dimension and that
it is interlaced with the spacial dimensions. This combination is called space-time. But
space-time is not so much a theory of time as it is a theory of gravitation. Gravity
effects (warps or bends) space and time in equal proportions. It is simpler to handle
these calculations together as one quantity, the space-time manifold.
There is no adequate theory of time in science. This is the great enigma of time. Everyone
is aware of it, everyone has a deep personal experience of it, yet no one can define it!

What would appear to be essential to physics would seem to be a theory of time, a
explanation of what time is. It is mandatory that science be able to specify what entities
the universe does contain and what it does not. What the universe is composed of or what
it is not composed of. From ancient times time and space to have existed in a kind of
knowledgeable limbo, neither existing or not existing, intermediate between real and
imaginary.

TIME MECHANICS

THE DYNAMICS OF TIME
A MOTION THEORY OF TIME

To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven.
Ecc. 3.1

OUTLINE

Thesis: Time is equivalent to motion, motion is a form of energy therefore time is a form
of energy. It directly follows from relativity that of some of the fundamental units that
describe the universe, three are all alternate equivalent manifestations.

According to empiricism all true knowledge stems from sense perception. Since we have
knowledge of time we must have some real sense perception of time, according to the
rationalist. Every natural effect has a natural cause. If the experience of time is a
natural effect then it should have a natural cause. Thus time should have a natural cause.

MOTION THEORY OF TIME

What is time? That we have not known. Einstein came closest when he said, "Time is what
clocks measure." Unfortunately the notion of clocks incorporate the fundamental notion of
time so that time really wasnt defined. Such a definition does not state what components
of a clock define time or inform us as to any properties of time. It is too vague.
I agree with Einstein, time is what clocks measure. So what do clocks measure? Mechanical
time, physical time or clocktime is the time measured by mechanical instruments. All
measuring of time requires comparison to regular occurring phenomena. Time requires some
change to be perceived. Change is motion, therefore time requires some motion to be
perceived.
There is no independent time. It is all dependent and all comparison. This makes time a
relation. What's the relation then? What is it relative to and what's the connection? Time
is a phenomena, it has corporal extension, in the things to which it relates or within
things themselves. One the other or both. Physical relations are necessarily between
things. State the thing and the rule that governs them and you state the relation.
Therefore we know that time is some thing and some process between those things.
If time is a thing or a relation between things we should be able to catagorize exactly
what that thing or relation of things is. We should be able to point to it, we should be
able to say, "That is time!" Therefore a theory of time is possible!
If a phenomena requires a concomitant process always to be perceived and no other
associated process it is only reasonable to assume that the concomitant process is the
primary process and not just a associated process. If time requires motion then motion
defines time and motion is time. If time is relative to motion then it must be connected
to motion in some way. A time that is relative to motion is inseparable from motion.
Clocks are motion machines. They move. There entire operation consists of there movement.
We translate this movement into a concept of time. A clock is mass in motion. If time is
what clocks measure and clocks are devices that measure motion then time is motion. Since
we measure time by motion a quantity of time becomes a quantity of motion.
Clocks are not measuring some external dimension they simply move. If we accept that time
is relative to motion then we are obliged to accept that the concept of time is
inseparable from motion. Then time is not a independent dimension that exists somehow
apart from everything.
Time is motion because it is observed to be such. A quantity can be conceived only from
some relation it bears to sensible objects. Things don't exist in time, time exists in the
motion of things.
Since at least the time of Newton time has been considered some ethereal unworldly,
immaterial quantity that can be neither isolated nor contained. Since time can be neither
isolated, contained or obtained in practice time has only been a relation to time keeping
devices. The entire modern concept of time is based on the measurement of time.
Generally in measurements a quantity to be measured is the measure of the same. A quantity
of mass is the measure of the same, a quantity of length is the measure of the same, a
quantity of energy is the measure of the same...All clocks keep time by measuring some
motion. If motion is the measure of time then perhaps a quantity of motion (time) is a
measure of the same (time). This implies that time is motion.
The analysis can also be reached by this reasoning, there is a inexplicable connection
between change and time. Without change it is impossible to apprehend time. It is even
conceivable that without change time does not exist. So time=change. All change can be
reduced to some kind of motion. Therefore time as change is also reduced to time as
motion.
In mechanics one concludes that all the processes of nature can be reduced to motions. Why
not time? The time taken for any motion is the period of that motion. Because clocks are
moving devises clocktime is just the comparison of one movement to another. Because of the
motion theory of time time really does not exist. It is just our relation of one motion to
another.

We apprehend time only when we have marked motion. But not only do we measure time by
motion but we measure motion by time, they define each other. This seems to imply a
equivalence. A clock measures time and it is assumed that time exists without clocks.
Everything that experiences time is a kind of clock and nothing that is not a clock does
not experience time. So every thing is a clock.
When we say we measure motion by time what we really mean is that we are comparing one
motion to another. So we do not measure motion by time but motion by motion. A quantity of
motion is the measure of the same. There is no way to measure motion except by motion.
This is actually true for all quantities. A quantity of matter is the measure of the same.
A quantity of energy is the measure of the same. A quantity of space is the measure of the
same. When something stimulates a balance we call it mass, when we can extend a ruler thru
a space we call it distance, when something heats a thermometer we call it energy...That
is we usually measure a thing by a quantity of the same. We measure mass by mass, we
measure distance by distance, we measure heat by heat...

Now the subject of time measurement is motion. If we measure time by motion it must be
motion. If the quantities we measure with our instruments is to be the subject of our
measurements. Until we can find some other quantity to measure we will have to take time
as motion, defacto.

If as Einstein said "Time is what clocks measure." What do clocks measure? A clock is a
machine, a device, a instrument, a construction of parts to a certain end. Is time
inherent somehow in the construction? Configuration? That I do not believe because there's
so many variations on clock design. There is nothing within a clock that generates time
and this is consistent with are experience of time as a external quantity. A clock however
as it is configured is nothing, does nothing, measures nothing until it is set in motion,
until a external force is added that sets it into operation. So what clocks measure is not
time but forces and if time is what clocks measure then time is a force or forces! Time is
a force!

The Time-Motion Equivalence Principle:
TIME = MOTION.

Motion theory of time hypophysis; Time is motion.

FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS

What is important from this analysis or any analysis of the operation of any clock is that
time (the measurement) depends on motion. Matter in motion determines both space and time!
Or at least the geometry of space and the chronomitry of time. Motion is the link that
connects space and time. Motion requires both space and time. Unless we could find some
way to define physical space and/or physical time without recourse to motion the two will
be inexplicably connected. This also indicates that motion is not really a derived term
since it is used to set the parameters of fundamental notions. When you start defining
time by motion you make time motion or a kind of motion weather it is truly a motion or
not. But it is no coincidence that time is motion.

Motion is the concept that connects space and time. It is impossible to conceive of motion
without both space and time. Is space-time a motion? They cannot be separated when
considering motion. If they cannot be separated they must be interrelated. If they are
interconnected there must be a physical interconnection. Since Einstein it has been known
that space and time very with motion. Space and time therefore cannot be independent of
matter in motion. Motion as a physical process must somehow be in physical contact with
space and time. Physical things only make contact with physical things. Therefore space
and time must be physical entities. If a physical connection exists one must wonder what
is the nature of this physical connection? The only (known) common connection between
motion, space and time is gravitation. Gravitation is a field in space, it drives the
motion of bodies and it has been shown to effect time dilation. Gravitation is the common
connection.
If we measure time by motion by the use of clocks how do we measure motion because we
certainly aren't using time. This means that what we are really doing is making
comparisons of one motion to another. And the concept of time really becomes unnecessary.
In effect we are only comparing one motion to another where the concept of time acts as a
intermediary, essentially a mathematical concept. Time cannot at the same time be measured
by motion and the measure of motion. We cannot take time as a fundamental notion even if
we wanted to because it is impossible to measure time without motion. Motion is the
fundamental notion.

Under the motion theory of time motion must be taken as a primitive undefined term
replacing time. The expression v=d/t must be taken as a expression of two motions one
compared to the other. Where the motion in the t variable is a standard unit of
motion/time. What you actually have is motion defining itself by the use of clock motion
which is the standard. Therefore it must be admitted that motion is a fundamental
quantity. Really what we call time is really motions and comparisons of motions. When I
see the expression T=D/V I see time being expressed as a mass moving with a velocity thru
a distance. And that is a motion.
Given a motion such as a vibration in a string, the string will be marked in segments, 1,
2, 3, 4, 5...so that when the vibration reaches a particular segment, segment 1 equals
time one, segment 2 equals time two etc. We see that motions can serve as there own
chronometers. This is our clock. The shape of the string can be described by some equation
say y=f(x) at t=ta. But the reverse is also true that motions define time. Really only the
motion exists.

We see that the time variable can be omitted. It is not required. This is strong evidence
that time = motion. Time is the number of motion. Time has a number because velocity is a
quantity and quantities have numbers. Every motions numbers can be compared, this is time
a comparison of motions. Time is a motion but it is a rate of motion. Time is a rate. It
becomes a rate when one is compared to another.

TIME IS A FORM OF ENERGY.

Because time is motion and motion is a form of energy time is a form of energy.

T = E

So we no longer just have E=MC2, not just one relation of one fundamental parameter to
another but we have added another. Now we also know that time is energy. Perhaps this
energy can be harnessed.

MOTION PROPERTIES OF TIME

A mechanistic explanation of the properties of time. Many of the properties of time can be
explained in terms of motion. Time becomes a physics of motion which is well understood.
It can be explained wholly in terms of motion, there is no need to recourse to a
hypothetical dimension of time, or the transformation of such a dimension to effect local
time. We do not need any meaning for time apart from motion. If time is motion then all
the properties of motion are properties of time and vis versa. If motion could be stopped
then time could be stopped. And I do not mean relative motion. With the proper technology
objects can be frozen in time. Of course such objects disappear from or plane of view I
believe.

Time is relative because motions are relative. The relativity of time is just the
relativity of motion.

PHILOSOPHY AND TIME

Many notions of physics are not physics. Many of our most basic and core ideas are
notoriously difficult to define. How do things exist? Where did they come from? How do
things change? If things are constantly changing how are they the same things? The same
and yet different? Are things one or are they many? What is substance? What is space? What
is time? What is energy? Many a physicist will tell you that he doesn't have to understand
such concepts he only has to be able to define them. Unfortunate for many physical
concepts they cannot be defined exactly or even roughly. It is not good enough to say "I
cant define them but I know them when I see them." Not if what you are practicing is exact
science. How can you have exact science built on such weak foundations?

Consider time and space, traditionally two of the most important of concepts of physics.
There has been no true theory of time and/or space. No physical explanations of them.
Having no explanations both have had to reside as metaphysical theories. Really as nothing
more then metaphysical phantoms, primarily apprehension of the mind alone. Not truly
physical and therefore incapable of physical analysis. To me it is intolerable that such
important physical notions should have been disposed of.

Of course the reason why time and space have remained metaphysical notions is obvious.
Both have the same surreal properties. Both appear to be immaterial. They cannot be
handled, weighed, felt or observed. They appear to be nothings, fictions unreal and
immaterial. As nothings both are uncreatable and indestructible. Both are invisible and
incorporeal. Except to reason to are hardly real, beholding them as if in a dream. One
inalienable property of any thing is that it be, that it occupy space, that it be felt, be
observable. But that which has no mass, no weight, no feeling, no taste, no sound, can it
exist? Can it be? It is impossible to prove time is motion because it is like saying time
is time. Some physical notions are so basic that they can only be accepted by there
shrewdness.



GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION

THE THERMODYNAMICS OF MOTION AND TIME

In this section I intend to demonstrate that what we call time is simply a manifestation
of the force of gravity. That is, I will give a definition of time by what causes it and
how it operates. This new explanation of time will itself suggest a alternate theory of
motion. Thus this section is both a treatise on time and a alternate theoretical
development of motion.

TIME AND THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT

NEWTONIAN TIME VS. EINSTEINIAN TIME
ABSOLUTE TIME VS. RELATIVE TIME

Does the notion of absolute time still exist? Is it still viable? Having completely yoked
time to clocks I find somewhat of a paradox. If you define time by clocks your definition
acquires all the failings of any earthly container, all the weakness of the flesh, all the
foibles of mortality. The flesh is weak. To have a good definition of time you need a good
clock. But what is a good clock? If you have a bad clock a bad definition will almost
certainly result. The idea of good and bad clocks of course is a hold over from Newtons
concept of absolute time. Where every event had a absolutely correct time. A good clock
was a clock that corresponded to that time. While we have abandoned the idea of absolute
time we have remained saddled with the concept of good time. Of course good-time is
nonsense or at least I don't know how to define it. Good and bad time is only consistent
with Newtonian physics not Einsteinian physics. It has been difficult to divorce our
selves from many of these old conceptions. Because we don't even notice that they cling to
us. Human beings are still plagued by the superstitions of the past how much more of
antiquated concepts. There is no good time or bad time or right time or wrong time.

Of course you will never know the good from the bad, what definition will you use to
choose? Time becomes a contradiction when you base it on judgement. The best we can have
is a agreed upon time. We set our clocks so the velocity of light is c, if we set our
clocks so the velocity of light is c it is inevitable that the velocity of light will
always be c. Is the velocity of light c or do we make it c by the chronomitry of our
clocks?

All clocks have to be set, they have to be calibrated, they have to be coordinated. What
if we could create a clock that was not effected by motion. So called a perfect clock. For
such a clock one must ask, what are the laws of physics then? What is the velocity of
light? This kind of clock can be constructed. Its period is not relative to motion. It is
simple a mathematical fiction using the Lorenz contraction . Its time will be different
but in sync with a clock in a higher gravitational field. The thing is the clock in the
higher gravitational field will be calibrated so that it reads c for the velocity of
light. The lower clock will read a increased velocity for light. Which is right? So the
velocity of light is not truly constant but variable.

Physics depends upon the clock you choose. Thus Newtonian physics is correct if you use a
relativistic clock and Einsteinian physics is correct if you use a Newtonian clock. It is
odd that each would require the others kind of clock. They complement each other.
Newtonian time is defined such that it was supposed the speed of light varied, Einsteinian
time has time where the speed of light does not vary. The former problem was that
Newtonians were trying to use a Newtonian clock. Good science, bad clock. Of the two kinds
of clocks which is right? Which is the correct time? Both and neither of course. You might
as well ask, "Which path does the electron take?"

With such a clock I was able to obtain varying velocities for the speed of light. The
speed of light is not constant. This discovery negated Einsteins second postulate. From
the negation it is possible to construct a anti physics. A contradictory physics. Just as
it was possible to develop contradictory geometies by negating the fifth postulate so too
can we negate Einstiens second postulate, the constancy of velocity of light. You can
either derive relative time, relative mass, relative distance from the absolute motion of
light or you can derive absolute time, absolute mass, and absolute distance from the
relative motion of light with neither being right or wrong so it is possible to construct
various scientific paradigms with neither being right or wrong! If you find such things
interesting.

Given two clocks in a gravitational field at rest of identical construction if you drop
one it will remain synchronized with the stationary clock for as long as it falls. That
is, They will remain in phase (simultaneity-clocks are simultaneous or in phase if they
appear to pulse at the same rate from boths frame of reference) and at the same frequency
(time dilation). There are no relativistic transformations from the motion. This shows
that time dilation is not relative to motion but too energy. The energy does not change
because it is only being converted from potential to kinetic energy. The two clocks remain
in sync because they remain at the same energy level.

Frequency=time Dilation,
wavelength=space dilation,
amplitude=energy dilation.

Relative transformations require absolute changes in energy. And while a clock falls from
a height the energy is not changed it is only transformed form potential to kinetic
energy. This shows that potential energy also causes time dilation not just kinetic
energy. The overall energy does not change. This is why clocks vary in a gravitational
field. Time like motion is a vector quantity it not only depends on the quantity but also
the direction. All that matters is absolute changes in energy and the direction they move.
Falling clocks, measuring rods, weights, remain Galilean reference bodies because for them
no gravitational field exists, they are not effected by gravitational time dilation under
the same conditions. This also shows that it is not motion that is the dominant source of
time dilation but gravitation.

VELOCITY OF LIGHT

You may wonder does the velocity of light equal c for the falling clock as it does for the
stationary clock since they run at the same time but are in different motions? Because
they keep the same time but one is moving and the other is not they cannot possible record
the same velocity from a source of light. This means that the velocity of light is not
constant!!

Let us analyze what is happening. We know while the two clocks are in sync they are not
truly in sync because one is experiencing greater gravitational force since it has fallen
to a lower gravitational position. The lower the position the greater the gravitational
force and the greater the gravitational effects. The stationary clock records the velocity
of light as C with a frequency n because let us say we have calibrated that clock to be
set at a rate just so that result is experienced. Say we have another clock right next to
it set in the exact precise way. The clocks are in sync. They are also at a high altitude
so that one clock can be released and various experiments can be preformed.

Now the one clock falls the other remains stationary. By sending pulses of light between
the two we determine that they appear to remain in sync relative to each others frame of
reference. Now we take a beam of light and point it downward so that it passes both the
falling clock and the stationary clock. Both measure its velocity. Both come up with
identical readings. How can this be. We know they are not truly running at the same rate
because of varying gravitational forces. The only explanation is that the velocity of
light increases as it falls. The falling clock rate also increases as it falls. The
greater the gravitational force the faster a clock runs, its periods are shorter.

So the result is that in direct proportion light and clocks fall at the same rate
equalizing each other so that the velocity of light appears to be constant. This could not
happen if the velocity of light did not actually vary! Light falls at the same rate as
everything else in a gravitational field! Only the frequency will be changed. So light is
accelerated and decelerated and such as that. Light is accelerated thru a gravitational
field just like any other particle! The velocity of light is not constant!

If energy is equivalent to mass then it must be subject to gravitation just like mass.
Light must not only bend in a gravitational field it must fall in a gravitational field
like every thing else. There cannot be two kinds of motion one for energy and one for
mass, one relative and one absolute?

This brings to completion Galileo's thesis of the uniformity of falling bodies. All bodies
fall at the same rate including light. Of course the velocity of light can only be
expressed in reference to time and clocks and using a Einsteinian clock (relative one) the
velocity of light will always appear constant. But we do not always have to use a
Einsteinian clock. We could use a Newtonian (absolute clock) and then will wind up with
many varying velocities for light. The velocity of light is purely arbitrary. It depends
purely on the clock chosen to measure its velocity.

EINSTEIN AXIOMS ARE A DEFACTO DEFINITION OF TIME

Einstein two postulates, the principle of relativity and the constancy of the velocity of
light, actually serve as a definition of time, that is as a calibration for setting
clocks. Making the velocity of light constant is the same as saying the only clocks that
record the velocity of light as c are correct. This serves as a calibration of clocks.
Only such clocks will be accepted as correct. It becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Only
clocks that record a velocity for light of c are correct therefore only the velocity c for
light can ever be recorded.

DOPPLER EFFECT

Light is a clock. In fact every particle is a clock. Actually every particle in motion is
a clock and since every particle is in motion every particle is a clock. All particles are
clocks! That is if time is motion. To the physicist any stable vibration is a clock. Every
quantity can be reduced to one of time. You see this in met achromatism, a change in color
due to a change in temperature. Since heat is time you could make color changes a function
of the time. Frequency is just variation in time dilation thus the spectrum of frequency
is just a spectrum of time dilation. Frequency is just the comparison of one time dilation
to another.

The time dilation or frequency of a particle changes with the motion. This is the same as
the Doppler shift for light color. If a frequency was so many per second this would be its
rythem or time. Changes in that frequency indicate changes in both energy and the time
dilation of a body. Basically all electromagnetic radiation is a kind of a clock with the
frequency playing the part of the length of the period. As light falls in a gravitational
field its frequency is increased, IE its clock runs faster, or as it rises its frequency
is decreased.

That time has direction can also be demonstrated by the Doppler effect. Pulsars are
superbly accurate clocks. Being masses they can also be in motion. The timing of a pulsar
can be effected by its motion. The pulse rate is increased when moving toward a observer
and decreased when moving away. Thus time dilation is a extension of the Doppler effect.
This is because time dilation is frequency and frequency is subject to the Doppler effect.
Since the Doppler effect is dependent on direction then so too must be time dilation
dependent on direction.

Every particle is a wave, every wave has a frequency, every frequency is a clock. Are all
particles clocks because they are waves. Or are all particles waves because they are
clocks? This of course makes time a micro property of particals. It is ridicules to
believe that such fundamental properties as time or space could have been associated apart
from material bodies or particals. Every property is a particle property.

TIME AND ENERGY

There is a connection between time and energy just as there was a connection between
electricity and magnetism. In 1820 Oersted discovered that when a electric current flows
thru a wire a magnetic field is set up, conversely Faraday discovered that when a magnetic
field is set up a electric current will be induced in a wire. Similarly when a clock is
heated it appreciates time dilation and if you could induce time dilation artifacts would
heat. This may be possible and a way to generate power. If a moving compass needle was
sufficient to connect magnetism and electricity then a moving clock hand is sufficient to
connect time and energy. Thus it is apparent that energy can be converted into time
(dilation) and therefore time should be able to be converted into energy.

this means,
T = E

This shows a undeniable connection between energy and time just as a undeniable connection
was made for electricity and magnetism. It means that time is a form of energy! Time is
motion, motion is energy therefore time is energy! Time dilation is therefore a relation
of energy and there is a form of time dilation for every form of energy.

There are not two forms of time dilation but many more.

(i) Mechanical time dilation.
(ii) Electrical time dilation.
(iii) Thermal time dilation.
(iv) Radiant time dilation.
(v) Gravitational time dilation.
(vi) Kinetic time dilation.
(vii) Potential time dilation.
(viii) Chemical time dilation.

There may be more.

Time dilation is caused by varying the energy levels of clocks. And there are many ways to
vary the energy of clocks. For these reasons time dilation should not be analyzed
according to motion but according to energy and specifically changes in energy.

Actually we don't want a Lorentz type equation based on velocity we want one that is based
on energy. But I don't know how to formulate it.

Because the energy varies according to various frames of reference the time also varies.
To obtain different frames of reference requires energy. This makes it unlike Einstein
relativity where values just only seem to exist in relation. These are real values that
can only be appreciated by real expenditures of energy.
The difference between the Earth and the moon is not just a relative value. To get to the
moon requires a hell of a lot of energy. If you want to appreciate that reference frame
you will have to expand that energy. This moves physics away from the relative back to the
absolute. Reference frames, they're energy, are absolute. Different reference frames
require different energies. So what relativity really means was that we exist at different
energy levels! That's what's relative.

Frequency, wavelength, velocity, period, amplitude, all the properties of any particle are
interconnected and interrelated by a common denominator - energy.

All these attributes appear to be functions of the energy. These of course are all
reminiscent of Planks constant, Time is the rate at which energy and matter interact.

TIME IS A FORCE!

The measurement of any time requires generally a acceleration, I mean something must set a
body in motion. Accelerations require a force, time is a acceleration, IE motion,
therefore time is a force! All time dilation therefore is not the result of motion but the
result of variations in the gravitational force surrounding a object.

The variations in time modulate just like variations in a force field. In fact directly
proportional to the force of gravity. This suggests that time is a force like gravity.
Since we have no notion of any other force like gravity except gravity we should accept
that time is gravity. This is because time is gravitation. Motion dilation is a
subdivision of gravitational time dilation. Motion dilation must be explained it terms of
gravitational time dilation. Gravitational time dilation is the cause of motion dilation.
TIME = GRAVITY

If time is a force and forces are accelerations then time is a acceleration.

Time = acceleration

The energy of any body varies with its motion.

If t=f then, time =s force. t=mxa and time =s mass times the acceleration. A change in the
force changes the acceleration. An increase in the force causes a increase in the
acceleration. A increase in acceleration decreases the oscillation period. Therefore an
increase in the force causes time to run faster. Time also varies with the square of the
distance just like gravitation does.

Or something like that.

Since time is a force it should be possible to express time as a force in equations. Every
time a time variable (t) appears it should be able to substitute it for the force of
gravity. Or analogously since time is energy it should be possible to express time as a
unit of energy. We would not say 15 billion years have gone by since creation we would say
20 trillion units of this energy has been expended. We may find out the universe has 100
trillion of these units therefore it would be one fifth thru its cycle. So the universe
would be one fifth old. Time only exists in proportion.

GRAVITATIONAL TIME

It will become obvious after I demonstrate a new theory of motion later that motion is a
subdivision of the greater concept of gravitation. It is totally dependent on gravitation
and specifically on gravitons. Because time is motion if motion is a property of
gravitation then time becomes a property of gravitation. Time=motion, motion=gravitation,
therefore time=gravitation. The cause of time is gravity, the effect of gravity is time.
Just as gravity envelopes us time envelopes us. All properties of gravitation are
properties of time and vis versa. What drives time is clocks, what drives clocks is
motion, what drives motion is gravitation therefore what drives time is gravity.
Gravitational time dilation and motion time dilation are really the same effect and are
caused the same way. Both are caused by variations in the gravitational field.

Motion is energy, energy is a form of mass, so motion produces mass, the greater the
motion the greater the mass, the greater the mass the greater the field strength,
variances in field strength are time dilation, therefore the mechanism behind motion
dilation is gravitation. All kinetic time dilation is gravitational time dilation because
all motion is motion thru a gravitational field and thru a range of energy levels. Special
time dilation (as given in special relativity) does not exist because special motion does
not exist. In special relativity the direction does not matter. In gravitational time
dilation it has to be considered.

Since time equals motion/gravitation all the properties of gravitation are properties of
time.

(I) Time varies in direct relation to the strength of gravity. The stronger the gravity
the faster the time.

(II) Motion is only defined in a gravitational field therefore time is only defined in a
gravitational field. (III) Since motion is a vector quantity time is a vector quantity.

If time =gravity then time is a sensation of gravity. This is what I mean when I say time
is a gravitational effect. There are several gravitational effects.
Weight is the most obvious one, inertia, and time. At first I though that
weight=inertia=time but this was wrong. They are of course all connected but each is a
particular sensation of a different aspect of the force of gravitation. The first
difficulty is "How can so many various sensations be generated from the same stimulus?"
One could ask the vary same question about electro magnetic radiation. Indeed we seem to
experience a wealth of sensations from a poverty of stimulus. Since there are only four of
them. For each is felt in a different way. Weight is felt at rest in a gravitational
field. Inertia is felt while in motion in a gravitational field. Time is a pure experience
of force alone. For example, in free fall say in orbit around the Earth we understand our
weight to be zero yet we still experience time. So time cannot be weight. The same holds
true for inertia. If one of these is varying then the others are also varying in exact
proportion. The relationship of time to weight and force indicates that time should be
able to be expressed as derived units, Because time is gravity and gravity is a force it
should be able to be expressed as units of force. But I do not know what these units would
be.

The rate of time depends on the gravitational force which in turn depends on the mass of
the related bodies. Which in turn depends on the amount of energy they posses. Rates of
time are different for different masses with different energy levels. A flea does not
experience time at the same rate as a elephant.

If you could change the time of a mass you would change its mass. This may allow for
perpetual motion.

Time cannot be warped by gravity because it is gravity. In this sense gravitational time
dilation does not exist.

VECTOR TIME

Time dilation depends completely on the energy and mass of a clock that records it. Since
energy/mass varies with the position of a body in a gravitational field and the direction
of motion in that field time is shown to be a vector quantity. Time is a vector quantity.
Because time is motion and motion is a vector quantity time is a vector quantity. Just as
a proper description of motion must include direction so too does a proper description of
time require direction.

THERMODYNAMIC TIME DILATION AND OTHER FORMS OF TIME DILATION

We know time changes with motion But we may well ask, "How does time know how to do this?"
This appears to be another sticky action at a distance. Actually it is a property of
gravity and everything associated with gravity appears to be a action at a distance. If
you have a action at a distance problem it would pay to start looking at gravity.

A change in the mass/energy of bodies alters the surrounding gravitational field which in
turn alters time. We know from the equivalence principle the motion, IE inertia is equal
to gravity. This can only imply that,

time = motion and motion = gravity therefore time = gravity.

Time is a effect of gravitation like weight or inertia. Because time = motion then it is
inevitable that the perception of time will vary with motion. Every observer has his own
peculiar energy level. Change the energy level and you change the frame of reference. You
also change the apparent motions. So it is not motion that occurs but only changes in
energy levels. A different energy level and the motion seems faster or slower.

There are more then two forms of time dilation. For every kind of energy transfer there is
a kind of time dilation. If motion can cause time dilation then so should any and every
other kind of energy since energies are interchangeable. Heat causes time dilation. Heat
causes expansion, variations in length cause clocks to run at various periods. Generally
the greater the temperature the slower the period. This is because heat is actually a form
of motion. The bigger something is or the more massive the slower it will vibrate given a
constant source of energy. This is also true of mass increases with energy. The more
energy the slower something vibrates. Therefore the greater the mass/energy the slower the
clock.

According to the kinetic theory of heat the hotter a body is the more the molecules within
it vibrate and the greater the heat the greater the amplitude each molecule vibrates. It
is by this greater amplitude that heat is conducted in a solid. This is similar to varying
the length of a pendulum, the greater the length, IE amplitude, the greater or longer the
period. So the greater distance thru which a atom must vibrate because of its heat the
longer the period of oscillation. Molecular clocks operate the same way as regular clocks.
Or in a different way of thinking what is true on the molecular level will always carry
over onto the macroscopic level. Thus microcosm and macrocosm are in harmony with regards
to time.

So why when you heat something up do processes run faster. Shouldn't change which is a
kind of time be in relation to time? Change, processes etc. require molecular
interactions. Undoubtedly when the amplitude of molecules is increased the statistical
probability of interactions must increase. Therefore generally molecular changes increase
when you heat them up. So change is not time, at least not molecular change since it is
not harmonious with time. And for this reason it has been falsely believed that with
energy increases time speeds up not slows down. Chemical processes may be misleading in
the notion of heat and time. We cannot think of process change as time. If processes are
quicker then we think of time having speeded up. But this is just a chemical anomaly.

Hot clocks run slow, cold clocks run fast. Hot clocks are more massive, cold clocks less
massive. The greater the mass the slower the clock.

Potential energy. Just as there was no difference in inertia mass vs. Gravitational mass
there is no difference in how energy is acquired by a clock.
If the clock obtains more energy in any way, be it heat, position etc., it will experience
time dilation. There is no difference in regards to time dilation with regards to
potential or kinetic energy. Energy is energy.

TWIN PARADOX

In the traditional analysis of the twin paradox no though is given to the variations in
gravitational force as two twins separate, this is because it is common in physics to
neglect gravitation because its effect vary at every instant. It is time to put
gravitation back into physics! You need three reference frames for the twin paradox. Each
twin and a control reference frame.
Twins inn different gravitation fields also age at different rates.

CONSTANTS

The speed of light as a physical constant is not a fundamental property of nature. It is
arbitrary, a quirk of time dilation, it just happens to be. There is nothing particularly
significant about it. The importance of it was that it illuminated the fact that time was
relative and thus a relation. For every constant there must be a compensating relation.
Because the constant velocity of light turns out to depend on a relativistic effect (time
dilation) this means that it also must be a relativistic effect. If something is constant
then something else must vary. For light it is time.

Constants are more the result of the fundamental parameters we choose then the physical
properties of nature. Choose one set of fundamental parameters get one set of constants,
choose another set of fundamental parameters and get an alternate set. Just like alternate
geometries. The human mind is always looking for landmarks on which to anchor itself. We
require constants as a frame of reference. So constants are mental properties more then
physical ones!

NEWTONIAN TIME / ABSOLUTE TIME / COMPENSATED TIME / THE EXTENDED CLOCK

How many kinds of clocks are there and what is there functioning. Are all clocks relative
or is it possible to make a perfect clock, ie, one that is not effected by motion. Let us
say from a particular reference point we had a clock and so calibrated it such that for
changes in motion we altered its period according to the Lorenz contraction in reverse
proportion. The result would be a clock that was not effected by motion. It would not be
relitive. It would be absolute. At least in relation to a particular frame of reference.

Any observer can work out how much time dilation does or would occur in relation to
another body. The calculation can be made if he knows the precise velocity and trajectory.

We could in effect extend the area over which such time is measured and effective thus
creating a zone of absolute time. Time would not be relative to any effects motion or
gravitational. I call such a time zone a extended clock and such absolute keeping of time
may be beneficial. It is certainly possible. In a sence every clock is extended in the
sence that its time is absolute over its effective range.

How to make such a clock? The Lorentz contraction gives us a way of calculating exactly
the relative time of other positions and motions. We can thus compensate for motion
mathematically . If we know our motion then we can recalculate for any time dilation. We
can synchronize clocks according to

We can do a similar thing for gravitational time dilation for clocks at rest in a
gravitational field and combine the two effects if necessary for clocks in motion in a
gravitational field.

This in effect makes a clock that is absolute to a particular frame of reference. Using
such a clock its period of duration varies. We can use any time keeping method we desire.
Since there is a absolute kind of time this also implies that there is a absolute kind of
space and mass too. Which means we can define a universe which is Newtonian if we liked
and it would be valid.

Consider two clocks in a gravitational field that are extended, ie, sharing the same time.
Lets say the higher clock is set such that it records the velocity of light as c. Now
consider the lower clock. For this clock light gains velocity as it falls. The lower clock
records the velocity of light as C+ gravitational acceleration. Indeed all light velocity
measured by this clock will also be the same and all greater then c. This is because this
clock has been set to run slower then it would normally at its particular energy level.
But it runs at the exact same rate as the higher clock. We don't find a thing wrong with
its measuring. So which is right? Is the lower clock right and does light have various
speeds? Or is the upper clock right and the speed of light is constant? Here are clocks
running at the same speed that record various velocities for the speed of light. It is
important to remember that extended clocks while I say they run at the same speed or
frequency they are not synchronous. If light pulses are exchanged between them they will
not be harmonious. They are only mathematically synchronized not physically synchronized.

This experiment introduces into physics the idea of extended time. A artificial kind of
absolute time. A universal time that everybody who can communicate with each other and
thus synchronize by extension they're clocks. So we now have several kinds of time.
Extended time- Extended time reintroduces into physics a notion of absolute time. Since it
is not depended on anything. Using such a clock we can synchronize over great distances a
absolute time scale. We can use such a time as any other. We can call such a extended
radius of time a extended clock.

In a way every clock is a extended clock because it generates a spacial region of time
over its length although such lengths are usually small. But it is easy to see how they
can be increased arbitrarily.

(I) Relative time- Clocks that start off synchronized but change as they are moved.
(II) Absolute time- Keep by extended time, clocks that operate without regard to motion.

Given various kinds of time one may well ask, "Which is the true time?" Neither one is any
less consistent.

It thus appears there are two valid physics, one Newtonian the other Einsteinian. In one
the velocity of light varies in the other it is constant. There is obviously a duality
working here. This means that Newtonian physics is just as true as relativity. When you
take the speed of light as a variable. Depending on the kind of time you choose.

Physicist like to think that physics is the most fundamental science but a great deal of
physics depends on the theory of dimensions. Time is defined by what clocks we accept as
accurate. It is really a state of mind. How dimensions are chosen, whether they are
relative or absolute is completely arbitrary. Such things as the velocity of light,
spacial coordinates, distances, time...One can use any coordinate system one liked, nature
does not favor any one. Nature has no knowledge of time.

Actually its takes not 4 coordinates to determine any event but 5. You not only have to
specify the coordinates but what kind of co-ordinates they are. This can and is done now
by specifying the velocity of light. Which both selects the fundamental dimensions of
physics , like time distance and mass and governs the choice of instrumentation. The
theory of dimensions will decide the topic of physics. Whether you decide that the theory
of dimensions is physics or not is arbitrary.

MOTION DILATION = GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION

Motion time dilation is just a form of gravitational time dilation. Time dilation varies
with the force of gravity, the force of gravity varies with the mass, the mass varies with
the motion, therefore motion dilation is actually the result of gravitational dilation.
For this reason the direction of the motion becomes important. Because mass/energy varies
with position. So whether a object is receding or preceding also has a effect on its time
dilation. For this reason gravitational equations will have to be used to describe motion
dilation. The Lorenz contraction is not accurate or completely accurate. .

Einstein had two different kinds of time dilation because he still had two different kinds
of motion,

(I) inertia
(II) gravitational

although he had shown by the principle of equivalence that gravity=inertia he failed to
recognize that to two were actually one. Greater motion causes greater energy, greater
energy causes greater mass, greater mass causes greater gravity, greater gravity causes
contraction, contraction causes heat, heat is vibration, vibration is motion, motion
causes greater energy....A change in any vibration causes a change in time by way of
gravitational force. Gravitons are the medium of the dissipation of time. Motion, gravity,
heat, oscillation and vibration are all gravity and they are all time. Only things that
can be oscillated can be heated, only things that can be heated can experience time. Time
is a material property. Things that cannot be oscillated cannot experience time. Things
that cannot experience time we cannot experience in time! (Dark matter/tacions?)

GRAVITATIONAL PROPERTIES OF TIME

For any vibrating body we know that the mass varies with the energy and the bodies in a
higher gravitational plane have greater energy of position. Therefore the period of a
vibrating body is proportional to the mass/energy and the greater the mass the slower the
period, the lessor the mass the faster the period. For this reason clocks in a stronger
gravitational field run faster then ones in a weaker gravitational field. Strong-fast,
weak-slow.

The elasticity constant remains constant, it is not effected by relativistic changes in
energy. If it was we could not use wight scales to measure variances in gravitational
force by use of gravimeters. To determine the period of a vibrating body, IE its
frequency, is the same as determining its time dilation. It goes back to motion,
time=motion, motion=velocity, for vibrating bodies velocity=frequency. If time is motion
then its measurement must be comparable with motion. Every object is at its own particular
time dilation.

GRAVITATION AND RATES OF TIME FLOW

One minor flaw in Einstein theory of relativity is his rate of clocks in gravitational
fields. Specifically Einstein states that clocks run slower the greater the gravitational
strength. This is wrong. The rate of gravitation has a direct relation on the rate of
time. A clock in a strong gravitational field will oscillate faster then one in a weak
gravitational field and one in no gravitational field will not oscilate at all! The period
of a clock is directly related to its length. A clock in a strong gravitational field is
shorter then one in a weak gravitational field, it will run faster. Assuming that time is
a force,

t = time
m = mass
a = acceleration
g = gravity

we see that time varies directly to relative mass and/or relative gravitational strength.
So the period varies directly to either. What becomes apparent is that the critical
element of time dilation is not motion, not gravitation, etc. but energy. The rate of a
clock is directly related to its energy, the greater the energy the slower a clock will
run. For this reason clocks fall under the rules of thermodynamics and some new
thermodynamic rule should be created to encompass this fact.

Of course the precise formula for time is a hell of a lot more complicated then this. This
is only general. Since motion is a vector quantity it must be remembered that time should
also be a vector quantity. So whether a objects velocity is positive or negative, IE,
moving away or positive, moving toward, alters the time dilation. Not just the velocity is
important. There are two kinds of motion, up and down or more importantly motion where
there is a change in a bodies energy and motion where the bodies energy is not altered.
Down constant, no dilation, up change in energy and a experience in dilation.

TIMES ARROW

THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF TIME

Because time is a form of energy some or all of the properties of energy will be
properties of time. Indeed I believe the entire science of time could become a subdivision
of the science of energy, thermodynamics. Proving an arrow of time is equivalent to
proving the second law of thermodynamics. Not because of the second law of thermodynamics
demonstrates a arrow of time but because the arrow of time demonstrates the 2nd law of
thermodynamics. Therefore there will always exist some quantity in physical processes like
entropy that always increase with time.

To know what causes the arrow of time you must know what causes time.

IRREVERSIBLE PARADOX

In Newtons mechanics, in Quantum mechanics and in Relitivity you can consider phenomina as
being able to run in eithor direction as regards to the motion of time. Thus in a sense
time should be reversible. Unfortunately it doesnt work in the real world. This weird
state of affairs s called the irreversible paradox. We should be able to reverse time but
we cant even on the smallest scale.

To prove the asymmetry of time we only have to find one true example of a nonreversible
phenominon. The problem being which processes are truely irreversable. Since we now know
that time is gravity there should be some phenomenon associated with gravity that is
irreversible if time is irreversible.

If something is at rest it stays at rest whether the time line is run forward or backward.
But when things fall peculiarities appear. Things never fall up.
Things may move upward but they are not falling. Things only fall down. Gravitation is a
asymmetric force, it is a pull and not a push. The asymmetric property of time is derived
from the asymmetric properties of gravity.

Time depends on motion, motion depends on inertia, inertia depends on force, the important
force governing motion is gravity, therefore some property of gravity must govern the
arrow of time. Because time is a extension of gravity a fundamental force it shares some
properties of gravity. The most important for the consideration of the arrow of time being
the gravity is not a symmetrical force.

Gravity is a asymmetric force. But to prove the asymmetry of time we do not have to
analyze fancy gravitational theorems. It can be done in a most elemental way.

Falling Man Experiment

The way up and the way down are not the same. There are two kinds of motion up and down
and they are different.

A man is in an elevator either in a gravitational field or experiencing inertia. In his
hand hangs a spring scale. From the scale hangs a weight. There are two possibilities,

(i) The weight stresses the spring
or
(ii) The weight does not depress the spring.

In case one the man can come to two conclusions,

(a) that he is accelerating,
(b) Or that he is at rest in a gravitational field.

In the case of number two he can assume he either is in free fall in a gravitational field
or that he is experiencing no acceleration since the scale is not being extended.

Now consider the symmetry for these two experiments. Only for the first case is time
symetrical. But consider case two. If time could be run backward instead of being in free
fall his motion would be reversed. Instead of falling he would be moving upward. If he
were moving upward his weight would be extended as the force of gravity operated on it.
Thus were have discovered a irrevesable process. Because it cannot be extended. It will
appear in freefall. A clear demonstration of irreversibility.

Therefore it is quite a easy to determining which way time is running in a movie
projection. . Motion in a gravitational field is asymmetric! Time is asymmetric! Because
gravity is a asymetric force.

Because the experiment can be carried out in relation to any phenomina we can consider all
phenomena orientated to an arrow of time. This is because all phenonina exists in
gravitational fields. Because they can either be converted to motion or are equivalent to
motion there fore they must obey the laws of motion. All is motion. This notion the
irreversibility of gravity, shows why some energy transformations are irreversable.
Gravity is the compass that always points time into the future.

The falling man experiment implies a law such as the second law of thermodynamics. Because
of its complete irreversibility physical processes will also have a irrevesable nature. We
notice this and call it the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

QUANTUM MECHANICS VS. THEORIES OF MOTION

The reason that quantum on a subatomic level seem to obey different laws then the laws of
motion or the law of time is because quantums are operated on by different forces at that
level. We know that the electric force because of its invertible polarity is completely
reversable. Atomic processes are truely reversable if the only forse involved is
electrical. For this reason some quantum processes are reversible and will not obey the
second law of thermodynamics. For example, a electron orbiting a nucleus. It never winds
down. Further such things as superconductivity appear to violate the second law. This is
why there appears to be a fundamental difference in motion between the microscopic world
and the macroscopic world where different forces dominate. Apparently there is not one
kind of motion but as many kinds as there are forces. Therefore microscopic dynamics is
not equivalent to macroscopic dynamics. In this sence there are micro laws and there are
macro laws. Different rules will have to be worked out for each. Actually they have been.

TIMES ORDER

Since time is a asymmetrical relation it should be no surprise like all asymmetrical
relations that it is a ordering relation. Because gravity is asymmetrical the universe is
asymmetrical, IE, ordered in time. Time is such a fundamental physical elemental that
actually it is the very paradigm of order.

THE LAWS OF NATURE AND TIME

Most if not all the laws of nature can be restated in terms of time.

Newton:
1: Every body continues at a uniform motion unless a force altered it.

IE, all bodies in equivalent energy states are synchronous with regards to time.

2: The acceleration produced by a force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the
forse and the mass of the body.

IE, to every change of energy there is a time dilation. Basically time is relative to
energy.

3: For every action there is a equal and opposite reaction.

IE, To every time dilation there is a corresponding time dilation everywhere else.

Thermodynamics:

1: energy cannot be created or destroyed.

Time cannot be created or destoyed.

2: That is any closed system heat only flows from a hot region to a cold one. The
direction of time flows only in one direction.

3: Absolute zero cannot be reached.

The cessation of time like the cessation of heat cannot be achieved for any body.

I doubt this one.

Relativity:

Actually the hypothosis that time is motion has already been advanced in the form of
Einstiens Equivalence Principle. Einstiens Equivalence Principle states that: gravity =
acceleration

This can be expressed as gravity = motion. If we accept that motion = time we must accept
that time = gravity.

Geometry:

Even geometrical axioms can be reformulated in terms of time. Time has long been
associated with geometrical concepts. Cyclic time, linear time, etc. Many aspects of time
are regarded by geometric notions. IE, short space of time, intervals of time, etc.
Whenever possible man has sought to subordinate the temporal dimension to the spacial
dimension or spacial concepts. Such as space time.

Many geometric postulates tho have time like relations. For example,

Three point postulate: Space contains at least three non collinear points.

Time also has three segments, past, present and future.

People have been very perplexed about this from early times but they do not seem to be as
perplexed about the three point nature of space.

The line point postulate: Every line is a set of points and contains at least two points.

Every segment of time has a beginning and a end.

A-B-C betweeness postulate: If point B is between points A and C then point B is also
between C and A, and all three points are distinct and collinear.

The same holds trues for points in time.

Newtons physics closely parallels Euclids geometry and is obviously a extension of that
geometry.

6. THEORY OF SPACE


QUANTUM SPACE

Originally space and time have been studied as if they were autonomous entities that exit
independently. As such there existence was not seen as varying by any relation; absolute
space absolute time. After all what connection or effect could corporal entities have on
non corporal entities? But it was discovered that such relations must exist, and in
precise mathematical relationships. So it has to be assumed that entities somehow affect
space and time.

If space can interrelate with matter perhaps it is not non corporal but a thing. It is a
thing like ,matter, or like energy. One day perhaps space will be seen as a energy field
that surrounds us.

The most critical fact concerning space is not its properties but its genius. What causes
space? I advance that space does not exist. Space is the result of particle interactions.
Particles hit us and we see space. If the particles did not hit us we would not see space.
Space is a relativistic effect. I call this notion quantum space. Space like time is not
independent of physical things, they are the properties of physical things. This is fairly
obvious when you consider that one universal property of matter is extension. If space is
a property of matter then it is not independent. Space is a thing therefore,

space = matter
space = energy

Bodies do not have space that contains them. Space is a purely sensible subjective
manifestation. People see space but what they are experiencing is energy, streams of
energy. For this reason space can be considered truly a thing. But not the noncorporial
thing we think it is.

Conversely to consider space as a material, real, physical entity has the immediate
difficulty that space has no physical existence. It cannot be weighed, it cannot be
contained, it cannot be heated, it cannot be separated, it cannot be condensed, cannot be
isolated, rarified, objectified.... It cannot be operated on in any way. No scientific
tests can be done on it. From the complete lack of objectification one would almost
conclude that space does not exist. But we experience it. It is like color, we experience
color but where does color exist? Space is not a idea that can exist separately from
material reality.

We have been associating time to distance for along time. If were asked about a trip we
might say it was long but we do not mean a long distance but along travel time. Distance
is the meaning of potential energy. Distance becomes a form of energy. It is impossible to
move any distance without expending energy. Distance is a form of energy. D = E Time and
space are extremely closely interrelated concepts. We use space to measure time and time
to measure space. It is difficult to think of one without the other. But they are utterly
distinct ideas, each with very different properties.

HOW TO TURN ENERGY INTO SPACIAL RELATIONSHIP. ENERGY BECOMES SPACE.

Consider two objects separated by a distance. They remain at a constant distance. Now
alter ones time dilation by changing its energy state. The distance between the two will
change. Space from energy. The transformation we call motion. When you alter the energy
level space appears to increase.

The same thing happens when electrons jump in there orbit. They do not move thru space the
spacial relationship is just altered. Thus distance is not a matter of space but of
energy. Distance becomes a function of energy. Distance and motion becomes only a change
in energy. Space does not actually exist. All the exists in reality is the energy. If
there is no distance this solves the action at a distance problem. From this we can no
longer say every thing in the world has spacial extension, at best we can only say
everything in the world experiences a spacial impression.

The curious thing about this is that both space and time are stimulated by the same
quanta. Time and space are created simultaneously. This is no doubt why space and time are
intermixed. They have the same causation.
But time is a different animal then space. A meter is a meter wherever you go. You can
carry it with you and upon returning wherever you were the meter remains unaffected.
Clocks are a wholly different matter. Clocks retain a history of there variations, they
will not coincide when returned to there place of origin. Relativity was based on the
Lorentz contraction but what if the contraction is fallacious? After all we have no direct
evidence of mass/space contractions as we do time. Masses are all local phenomena whereas
time can be at a distance. There is a strong connection between mass and space just as
there is a strong connection between time and energy. The flipside of mass is space and
the flipside energy is time. Actually the only two real entities are mass and energy.

DIMENSIONS

Why does space have various directions? One may as well ask why is there a up and down.
Dimensions exist in perception only. Dimensions result from the attributes of particles.
For every dimension there must be a corresponding attribute in a particle or a particle
itself to account for a dimension. There are four know dimensions and there are four known
force particles, coincidence?
Just as the time dimension was the result of gravitons the space dimension is the result
of electromagnetism. For every dimension you need a corresponding partical. Force
particals are vectors. And vectors have direction. Space is symmetric because some energy
particles are symmetric. This is why you can move back and forth in space.

NUTSHELL THEORY OF SPACE

Think of space as a shell the surrounds you equally, like the shell of a nut. Wherever you
go the shell follows you. The universe is such a shell. You carry your space along with
you wherever you go. You dont move, your space around you varies.

The universe expands not into space ,the radius varies directly with the total energy.
Since the universe is radiating gravitons it is losing energy. This loss of energy appears
as expansion. The expansion of the universe is a purely relativistic effect. As the energy
varies, the time dilation seems to vary, as the time dilation seems to vary, the distance
seems to vary. This makes it appear as if the universe is expanding. The universe has not
changed in size only in energy.

Creation started when graviton emission began. The universe, gravity, expansion, and time
all stared at the same time and have the same cause. The one peculiarity of a universe
which is a transference of energy, the expansion being caused by the loss of gravitons,
the question arises if these gravitons do not go out into space, where do they go?

7. THEORY OF MOTION

INTRODUCTION

The history of physics is a history of theories of motion. Mechanics dominates the science
of physics. There is in science few concepts older or more important then the concept of
motion. By motion we mean a change of position. Any new theory of time would necessarily
redefine the notion of motion. Any new definition of motion would alter our fundamental
concepts of physics. A altering of our fundamental concepts of physics would indicate an
alternate concept of the universe.

I divert from accepted understanding as concerns motion from the major premise of kinetic
theory, the Quantification of motion should already have been a well established notion.
But the adherence of the deriviation of motion from distance which like time is considered
continuous, has prevented acceptance of such a obvious and important fact. A quantified
motion will only be accepted when a quantified space has been demonstrate.

WHAT IS MOTION?

Physics is founded on the concepts of motion but what is motion? Motion needs gravity to
define it. From relativity we know that motion causes time dilation. It follows from the
reversal of a know effect that time dilation therefore causes motion. This means that
motion is a relitivistic effect. Time dilation is caused by all kinds of changes in the
energy states of a body. If motion is a change of time dilation then motions are peculiar
changes in energy. Motion is not a thing things do but changes within a thing.
For every change in time dilation say by variations in energy that bodies reference frame
will be altered. This will vary the reference frames time dilation. The observers in that
reference frame will experience spacial Lorentz transformations and this will appear as
motion. Viewers will perceive other reference frames as moving relative to there position.
Thus a change of time causes a change of position. You are not actually moving your time
is changing.

change time = change position

Time dilation causes apparent motion.

Time dilation is both space and motion.

What we call motion is just transformations of energy. For this reason motion is a
thermodynamic process.

Motion depends on particles for it to be experienced. If motion is always completely
dependent on particles then it is not independent. Motion as a independent parameter has
gone the way of independent time and independent space. Because motion is a relativistic
effect motion resides not in the body that appears to be in motion but the reference frame
itself. For this reason the point of actions are reversed (action at a distance). There
can be no action at a distance since motion is a relative ( local) phenomenon. Motion is
squarely in the eyes of the beholder. For this reason motion is not in a body it is in us.

Energy transformations can only be perceived at the viewers location. Effects that appear
to happen at a distance to the viewer really happen locally. For this reason there is no
action at a distance.

In the standard conception of motion a body moves thru space. But isn't it just as valid
to assume that space is moving thru bodies? And that bodies remain still? Do things move
in space? Or does space move past things?

MOTION IS A FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPT

Since time = motion and since time was a fundamental concept this make motion a
fundamental concept. It is not a derived concept as Newton envisioned.

Time is one of our perceptions of energy. Since motion is a form of energy we should be
able to develop the notion of time from energy relations. This should already have been
evident since the geometry of space time is determined by the motions of particles thru
it. Space and time become dependent on motion. This is there peculiar connection.

Integrating time and space into the concept of motion it becomes apparent that physics can
be constructed on just two fundamental notions, mass and energy which is really one. Since
space and time are energies. A significant unification.

T=S=M=E

Distance is also defined by motion.

Motion is not only critical to a theory of time but also to any physical theory of space.
Just as time is metered by the motion of events so is distance determined by the motions
of objects thru space at varius velocities and times. Specifically currently we measure
distance by the amount of time it takes light to traverse a specific region. Straight
lines are physical properties only in as much as they are defined in a physical way. Such
as the path of light which is a object in motion. Depending on how the object moves thru
space determines the geometry of straight lines. I simply reverse Einstein notion, if time
is relative to motion then motion is relative to time.

From this it should be obvious that time and space are inseparable from mass because they
are forms of mass/energy.

Newton said acceleration = force, I am saying that acceleration = change energy. Not just
changes of motion but all motions. Because motion is the result of particle exchanges all
motion, the experience of motion is the result of continuous forces. No forces no motion.
Motion is a force or the effect of force.

ACCELERATION/INERTIA

There are as many types of acceleration as there as particals that cause acceleration.
There is only inertia when two partical work at cross purposes. Usually one of the forces
is gravitation. Inertia then is the interplay of two forces. If so then if only one force
were operating then no inertia effects would be felt. This we find in the case when only
gravitational forces are present, as in free fall. Generally the only time inertia forces
are felt is when one force operates against gravity or when a object resists gravity. If
space were empty, truly empty, no forces present, then there would be no resistance and no
inertia forces for a body moving in any way or in uniform motion or in acceleration.
Inertia effects would vanish.

Without inertia effects motion as we know it would be impossible. And without
inertia/motion time would not exist. Therefore our sense of time is connected to our sense
of inertia. Therefore if we are experiencing inertia effects we can be sure we are
experiencing time dilation also and vis versa.

A body acting under a single force does not feel the effect of that force. For example
acceleration in a gravitational field. A body feels weightlessness, it does not experience
inertia. The inertia effect is only felt when two forces operate. This means that inertia
is a composition of forces. Inertia is a effect of the interplay of forces. This means
that inertia is not a internal ubiquitous property of mass but a emergent property of a
system of bodies and forses. Inertia is not a absolute, independent, internal property of
bodies but a relative and dependent property just like all the other properties of
physics. Inertia is the resistance of a body against the force of gravity.

8. RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM PHYSICS

RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM HYPOPHYSIS

That all the phenomenon of nature are the effects of particle exchanges.
or
NO CAUSAL RELATION WITHOUT A ENERGY TRANSFER.

Physical effects must have physical causes.

Relativistic- because it depends on effects that are relativistic.

Quantum- because the effects are the results of quantum exchanges. Our experience of
reality is the confluence, the flow of quantums into our reference frame.

Event-Events are energy transfers.

All relative effects are quantum effects.

By making relative effects quantum effects it conjoins quantum mechanics and relativity
into one science

Every moment in time, every event is signaled by a energy change. For every event there is
a energy change. For every event there is a transfer of energy thus every event has a
cause. Events are causal relations. Ultimately the cause of all events are quantum. All
events are quantum events. They don't just happen particles make them happen. If there
were no particles operating then no events would happen.

RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS

Relativistic effects are like distortions like the waviness in the atmosphere on a hot
summers day. We do not see what we actually see but a distortion, distorted by energy.
Energy distorts our perception. We think we see space, motion etc. but we really just see
energy distortions.

QUANTUM FORCE

For every force there is a corresponding force particle. Thus instead of f=ma, we have f=
change energy. Thus for forces you can substitute partical energies. There are no feilds
because there is no space. Feilds are only a ghost of a action. Lines of force are not
active agents operating on a body to produce accelerations or motions. But instead are the
paths that force particles traverse in there flight from one location to another. These
paths and therefore space would be straight were it not for the effects of gravitons on
the moving particals.

The discovery that all forces obey the same kinds of laws or there actions can be
described by the same kinds of equations has lead some to presuppose that all forces are
somehow interrelated and have a common origin. It is now easy to see that because all
forces are propagated in the same way as particle emissions that the similarity results
not from a common force but a common mechanism. Because each force has a separate partical
associated with it the forces should be considered separate until or if every such
particals can be shown to be convertible. I do believe one type of particle can be
transmuted into another kind.

QUANTUM TIME

Since time is motion and motion is gravitation (principle of equivalence) and if gravity
is caused by particle interactions then time is caused by particle interactions. Lets call
these particles, chronitons. Since time = gravity it turns out that

chronitons = gravitons.

This is why it has been so hard to determine a cause for time.

Since time is a form of energy and since energy is quantified then time must be
quantified. Time comes in packets, time moves in increments, time is not continuous, there
are gaps in time. The amount of time corresponds to the smallest amount of energy that can
produce motion. Time is processed in discrete units. Time seems continuous just like
motion seems continuous but it is not. Time is not like points in time but like segments.
Every segment of time is a piece of time. It has a beginning, middle and end because every
motion has a begining , middle and end. The length of time is Planks constant.

If time dilates from motion and motion is a form of energy then time is a form of the
energy,
t=f(e)
time and dilations and such do not really depend on motion or position but absolute
changes in energy. No change in energy no change in time dilation regardless of motion or
position. No motion. This is because time is a function of the gravity, gravity is a
function of the mass, mass is a function of mass/energy relationship which is relative.
Actually time dilation is a function of the mass
t=f(m)
The bigger something is the greater its time. The sun may not think it will burn for 20
billion years, to it may seem like two billion. I do not know if the planet seems to move
faster with the increased velocity of time? But if time is speeded up so should every
thing else.

Because mass determines the gravitational force what we really mean is
t=f(g).

Because the gravitational mass is a function of the energy.

If you accept the relativistic quantum hypophysis then as regards to time the first
question you ask is "What particle or particles can we associate to time?" Have we not yet
discovered chroniotons or have we mislabeled them? What kind of properties should the
chroniton have? What kind of particles are we looking for? Are there any known particles
that are suitable candidates for the chroniton? Perhaps gravitons are not chronitons and
we should look for a completely other force.

Because time is motion and because motion is mediated by a force and because force is
mediated by a particle I begin by assuming that time is mediated by a force particle. And
there are only 4 of these and only one general universal one. Since time appears to be
general and universal I have to assume that gravity is the time particle. Since time is
the force of gravity and since gravity is the abundance of gravitons chronitons=gravitons.

Actually because I feel time is equivalent to energy (because time dilation appears to be
consistant with all forms of energy) any form of energy transfer would simulate our
sensation of time. That is, any energy particle would stimulate the time dimension. It is
just that gravity is the most consistant one we experience.

In quantum time what is important is not motion or distance or length... these can all be
replaced buy one notion, energy. Clocks correspond to frames of reference. A clock is a
frame of reference and as much as you alien yourself with it you are in that frame of
reference. Just as every reference frame has a particle motion, a particular potential
energy, particular temperature etc. so every reference frame has a particular energy.
Actually reference frames can be in this way described by one number. Thus every reference
frame can be assigned a energy value of level. Frames with the same energy level
experience simultaneous time, and frames that experience simultaneous time are at the same
energy level.

ACTION AT A DISTANCE

Action at a distance is not a real effect. No effects can be produced thru a distance, all
effects are local.

WAVE MECHANICS AND TIME, PHASE AND FREQUENCY

Clocks have the same wave-mechanical duality as other bodies. They have a velocity, they
have a wavelength, they have a frequency and they have a amplitude. The fundamentals for
describing things in wave mechanics. Of course every micro property has a corresponding
macro property and vis versa.

Time has some notions that correspond to notions of wave mechanics.

Phase = simultaneity
Frequency = time dilation
Wavelength = space
amplitude = energy

When you set a interval of a clock you are really setting or coordinating the period, IE,
the time dilation of a clock. Its frequency. Time dilation corresponds to frequency.

Two important characteristics in setting a clock are setting its simultaneity, the exact
moment in time it is and setting its period, the length of its mechanism. One measures
epoch the other measures interval. We alter clocks to suit our convenience.

Take frequency for example, two observers measure the frequency of a beam of light they
pass between them. If for each the frequency is the same then they have the same time
dilation. Or consider phase, If they observe the same cycles at the same times, the
wavelengths correspond at the same points in time, then they are in phase, they have the
same simaltiety, Two observers can be operating at the same frequency but be out of phase
as Einstein showed. If they are in phase then they share the same instant.

There is really nothing special of different about a clocks frequency or its phase. Except
that we use clocks as a base or standard. No different then any other particle that has
wave particle duality.

The expression
Force=#wavelengths / time
is really a comparison of two frequencies. Just as in the motion theory of time time was a
comparison of two motions. Since anything can be used as a clock every thing and anything
is a clock. You see that every particle has a frequency and a phase because every particle
is in time and has its own time, own energy level.

When you stop thinking of time as a universal property you have to discover internal
properties of quanta that correspond to these concepts. They are universal only in that
all quanta have these properties. Properties of the universe ultimately must reside in the
particles that make up the universe. This is why I often say the Universe has no
properties. Only particles have properties. The universe only has substance, being.
Substances have properties. You can never really experience the universe just substances.

In quantum mechanics the frequency of any wave function is a function of the energy.
Frequency= energy/ Planks constant. Since frequency is time dilation we see that time
dilation is a function of the energy. This means that time dilation and time itself is
only dependent of the energy levels a object resides at. Time is a fuction of the energy!
Since energy is defined by frequency and frequency by time we arrive at another
equivalence, time energy equivalence.

ENERGY = TIME

But we already know this. Energy is time and therefore some form of energy must correspond
to time. Changes in frequency imply changes in energy and vis versa.

SIMULTANEITY/PHASE, THE NOW

When we talk a bout simultaneous time we really mean the now, the present, were every
thing happens. For simultaneous time you really need more then one clock. Or for relative
time for that matter. All clocks go at the same rate if they are of identical construction
and have the same energy. Is your now the same as my now? Does everyones now happen
simultaneously? How does the now happen? How do you get to the now and how can you get
away from it?

Einstein define simultaneity by the signal theory of light. The concept of determining
simultaneity by signals of light. This is close because we now know that time is dependent
on particles namely gravitons therefore simultaneity is dependent on those signals.
Without a exchange there is no time. Thus the meaning of simultaneity must be dependent on
them. And the rate at which they are transferred. For two clocks to be simultaneous they
must be at the same frequency and phase.

QUANTUM GRAVITY

Kempler originated the concept of gravity He deduced the sun was the causal agent for the
motion of the planets. He speculated that the sun produced its influence by emminating
some kind of rays.

Here is how gravity works.

Gravitational bodies emit gravitons. Each time a particle is received alters the reference
frame, that is that reference frames clocks run slower. As clocks run slower in a given
period of time the spacial dimension changes and a body appears to be moving. Further as
the time slows more particles are perceived to be received. This accounts for the inverse
distance parameter. Gravity is just the exchange of particals. When a graviton hits you it
appears as if a body has moved towards you. There is no action at a distance. Gravitation
is within you not within the apparently moving body.

As clocks slow down due to increase of energy due to gravitons distances appear to be
shorter thus gravity appears to be a force that contracts us.

more energy--clocks run slower--contraction
less energy--clocks run faster--expansion

This is how I deternineds this relation. Assume the universe is one unit wide to begin
with and it takes one unit of time for light to cross this distance. So it is one light
unit in distance. Now we lose energy and our clocks run faster. Light travels at the same
pace, the size of the universe has not changed, but lets say instead of one we see three
units of time transpire. We assume the speed of light is constant. Now the universe
appears to be three light units across--a expansion. It is not the distance that has
changed but our time dilation. So when clocks gain energy we perceive a contraction, when
there lose energy we perceive a expansion.

QUANTUM SPACE

Just as time= gravitational field space is the electro-magnetic field.

SPACE = ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD

Space is a force! Space is not nothing it is pure force. Space does not exist out there,
it exist as a property of particles, better yet as a relation between two particles. The
interaction of these particles gives rise to the sensation of space. So space is a
subjective experience. We call space empty but in fact it is full of fields. It is these
fields that are space. Since there are mostly electro-magnetic fields I attribute the
generation of space to electro-magnetic fields. Of course there are no real fields.

CONSTANTS

Constants are invariants that do not change under transformations of energy. Natures
constants are nothing more then the constant properties of particles associated with the
identical property of particles and there seeming identical property of interaction.
Particals are identical and always operate in consistant ways. This is what makes science
possible. Show me a constant in physics and Ill show you a particle. All constants are
particle properties. For example for G it is the acceleration a graviton will produce.

UNIVERSAL EXPANSION

The universe will wear out like a garment, it will become threadbare.
-Holy Christian Bible

Because everything in the universe can be considered a relativistic effect. The universe
is not a mechanical devise. It is much more like a solid state devise that operates wholly
electronically. It is a universe with no moving parts. Mass radiates gravitons. Gravitons
are energy. As gravitons are radiated there energy is lost. As there energy is lost space
appears to increase. The universe appears to be expanding. But in fact gravitational forse
is only decreasing. The universe is not expanding it is decaying.

As the gravitational forse is expanded the universe appears to expand. The univervse can
not collaspe because gravitational effects can not collaspe. There will be no end to the
universe or its expansion as long as gravity exists.

The universe appears to us to be spherical because of the uniformity of time dilation. The
same time dilation that cause the constancy of light cause the sperical universe. Distance
is a function of the time which is a function of the energy. There are many other
symmetries such as the spherical universe and one could ask "Which of these originate not
so much in the universe but fron the interrelation of concepts?"

I have to add a major revision here. I was plagued by uncertainty in relation to my
analysis as to why the universe is expanding. I keep trying to make the universe expand.
The universe is not expanding. Of course on one level I knew this, that the universe is
the same size but I was trying to make it expand from all reference points. This is
clearly impossible. First of all we can only know our reference point. The universe only
appears to be expanding to us, from our reference point. We are losing energy in the form
of gravitons in relation to the universe. In relation to the universe it is our clocks
that are running faster. The universe only expands from our point of view. The Hubble
constant is not so much a function of what the universe is doing but what we are doing.
The
lose/gain energy = Hubble constant
as a function of the time dilation.
This confused me because in relation to the Earth we gain energy in the form of gravitons
but in relation to the universe a different reference frame, we lose energy. We experience
a contraction and a expansion simultaneously. This was confusing. But it is because there
are two reference frames. In relation to one gain in relation to another lose. The size of
the universe and its expansion rate is a direct result of graviton emission in relation to
mass.

BOHRS ORBITS

I have already shown that variations in energy cause variations in time dilation. Since
energy comes in quantum units time is not smooth but quantified. A change in the energy
causes a instantaneous change Why are Bohrs orbits quantified? We know that position in
physics is equivalent to energy. Thus orbits are equivalent to energy levels. If energy is
quantified then orbits must be quantified.

Quantum jumps are actually a form of time dilation but that is instantaneous. A jump being
the ability of a particle to seem to instantaneously dematerialize in one location and
rematerialize in another location at the same instant. This appears to happen when
particals transition orbits and during other quantum phenomina.

Energy warps time. Since by planck's formula,

You see a change in energy chases a inverse change in the wavelength. If the change in
energy is instantaneous the motion will seem instantaneous. Sudden changes in orbit ie
energy seem instantaneous because of time dilation, they actually experience a time warp
and jump from orbit to orbit outside our perception. This only happens on the quantum
level because it is only there that energy is quantified, in the macro world energy
appears continuous.

THE END
Tony Lance
2007-06-24 18:21:10 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing features
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/features.html
6K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.space.policy

Features, hyperbole and blurb, on the Pastures package and the quest.

From Pastures Software Package Documentation.
(Particle Structure Results Program in Fortran 77.)
Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System.
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Big Bertha Thing language

The purest form of the english language is contained
in the dead sea scrolls. There is not a lot of it, even there.

Pure english language is a bit like house dust, all dead skin.

The living bits of the english language are anything but pure,
borrowing from a dozen drunken, pilaging, barbarian invaders,
with not one good intention between them.

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997.
To comply with my copyright,
please distribute complete and free of charge.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Big Bertha Thing galios

Nobody understood a thing he said, when he was alive.
After he was dead, they decided that he had done a good job.
The Galios Theory branch of mathematics bears his name.
Now they are trying to teach me, what he did in the first place.
Do you think that the penny will drop, before it becomes posthumous?
Tony Lance
2007-06-25 20:51:42 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing gyro
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/gyro.html
Access page JPG 12K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.war.nuclear

Drawing of an ordinary gyroscope.

Caption:-
Fig. XVI

Extract from the Introductory Chapter:-
But the most interesting top of all is undoubtedly the ordinary
gyroscope. That depicted in Fig. XVI........ although merely
sold as a toy, is nevertheless capable of illustrating
the gyroscopic phenomena which have been so much made use of in
modern mechanical invention.

From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing rita

Educating Rita

This film portrays a dominant spouse and a long-suffering student,
to the extent upto and including divorce, book-burning and forced
pregnancy.

There was zero privacy. Any attempt to re-register or change
the password would not work, because the secret could not be kept.

Every posting by the spouse is a violation of OU rules and the students
education, causing real pain. Vetting by one moderator or by several
using a non-public Rita conf. would not work, because the spouse
would use the students name, with all the further alienation
that would cause.

A new policy needs to be adopted. The last resort punishment measure,
needs to be the first resort measure on compassionate grounds;
that of making the student read-only on FC. The student would thank
you for it, but not publically.

It would need to be agreed between ACS and OUSA, which is what
they are there for.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Saturday, November 22, 1997 12:07:14 PM
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Big Bertha Thing noah
To: Astronomy & Space
Cc: OUSA Research
Rosemary F. Johnson,oufcnt1.open.ac.uk
Just another thing.
3. When its raining cats, dogs, kitchen sinks, the lot. The time
to start worrying is when you see a guy building an ark.
Pastures is mathematical ark, to negotiate a sea of numbers,
with Outlandish PPT by Structure, as the first of many rainbows.
Tony Lance
2007-06-27 18:39:34 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing redoubt
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/redoubt.html
Access page to 600K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.physics.particle

Postings potentially suitable for;-
1. SRF Classical Astronomy
2. SRF Classical Mathematics
3. SRF Classical Physics
4. SRF Classical Chemistry

After 15 months, an armistice term has just been fullfilled.(2nd Battle)
Student research project conferences, by invitation only, now available.

Battles without cost are not battles.
I have just had the following shot out from under me:-
1. www.bertha.ndirect.co.uk (disabled)
2. Paid UK ISP Net Direct. (15 months)
3. Professional newsgroup SP Dejanews.com (3 months)

To the victor the spoils. See my new newsgroup review
section, complete with copyright.


Big Bertha Thing memoriam

Tony died raising his best friends family,
His wife needed two helpers, his poor heart and him.
Carer, postman, welder and domino player.
RAF aircraft fitter at Battle of Britain and El Alamain.
Outboxed a voortrecker at middleweight.
Raised trade union branch president and
National officer of voluntary .org
Taught me to keep the faith,
Mend my bicycle and trigonometry.
His story is ended, but not yet finished.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.chem,rec.aviation.owning
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing blogs
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:43:19 +0000


From: Uncle Al
Date: Thurs 30 Dec 1999 00:00
Email: Uncle Al <***@hate.spam.net>
Groups: sci.physics


***@bertha.ndirect.co.uk wrote:


[SNIP]
OLD TESTAMENT ROSARY
By Tony Lance
1. The Promise of Anna. (I Kings 1)
2. Three Angels Visit Abraham. (Genesis 18)
[snip]

Proper netiquette would have you place the wowser crap at the top so
you could be ignored at the onset. What will you do on 02 January
2000 when Elvis doesn't show? Uncle Al suggests killing all your
false priests. Think of it as evolution in action. (One supposes
your suicide thereafter would be asking too much?)
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
http://www.ultra.net.au/~wisby/uncleal/
http://www.guyy.demon.co.uk/uncleal/
(Toxic URLs! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
Tony Lance
2007-06-28 19:55:19 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing sedan
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/sedan.html
Access page 19K JPG Image
Astrophysics net ring Access Site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.railway

Painting showing, so called hands up the pole sedan chair.

Caption;-
A Mandarin in his sedan-chair.

Extract;-
Jostling along is a most motley crowd. Here, for example,
comes the handsomely-decorated chair
of a mandarin who is engaged on state business.
Before him run two attendants armed with whips to clear the way,
and behind them are boys carrying large painted boards
on which is written, "Stand aside!" or "Respectful silence, please!"

From the book
The World and Its People
Asia With Special Reference to British Possessions
Published by Thomas Nelson and Sons 1903
Without Author or Editor Name
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing Bertha

First Big Bertha posting was to first aid tent
in OUSA Classical Particle Conf.,
to provide aid and comfort to victims,
who had been set upon by unnamed e-mail thugs.

There was no way to make direct contact,
with shell shocked victim, so we tried Big Bertha.
The trick worked and first victim is well again,
after saying, "At last, a normal man!"
Since then Big Bertha has developed a life of her own
and actually caught some thugs in the act.

First posting consisted of two anecdotes effort and repairs,
from Big Bertha Thing gamma and particle respectively.
Effort was also the last assault rifle shot fired.
Rollover and shotgun below, were the first Big Bertha
sent in anger, with reply to all sender and copy to conf.
Progress and anecdote forward was first cannon shot fired.
Spider and fact(newsletter and readership for astronomy)
was first landmine explosion,
which was not even deployed on OUSA Astronomy.

Big Bertha Thing apology(Rollover)

Please accept my apologies for troubling you.
It will not of course be repeated.
However 3 net surfers have responded
to my call to help out on the Conf., by volunteering.

In emergency situations, needs must.
You and your fellow net surfers number 3, I see.
Net surfers have broad shoulders,
thick skins and I trust, compassion.

Big Bertha Thing shotgun

By way of light relief, a similar general apology,
to the one above, would bring solace and comfort,
to the victims of such well intentioned postings.
Please put it in a Big Bertha and address to conf.
That of course, would be the end of spam.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Big Bertha Thing fusion

What is the cake-mix recipe for a fusion reactor?
1. There is no such thing as a self-sustaining fusion reactor.
2. There is no such thing as cold fusion.
3. That leaves high energy particle physics.
4. With the puffing billy principle of steam engine fame.
5. Take the two-ring medical electron cyclotron as the prototype.
6. Add another ring to it.
7. Dismantle the first two rings.
8. Update it to use a ball-bearing instead of an electron.
9. Add a steam iron.
10. Add an electrostatic charge generator.
11. Add a space satellite ion thruster.
12. Prove the existence of a magnetic field, which is weak at newtonian speeds
and strong at Einsteinian speeds.
13. This was proved by the costermonger in Big Bertha Thing spider.(see below)
14. It is directly proportional to momentum. (Memomagnetism)
15. It was missed, by science in Big Bertha Thing coil.(see below)
16. It was missed, by science in Einstein-Haas.
17. It was proved, by the two-ring medical cyclotron, with two different
electron masses. (Error Margin doubles to 4.4d-08 MeV)
18. Add electrostatic charge to ball-bearing.
19. Accelerate in first ring.
20. Kill charge with ion thruster and move to second ring.
21. Accelerate in second ring.
22. Move to third ring for minor speed adjustments, at near light speed.
23. Add a puff of steam.
24. Put plasma through heat exchangers.
25. Dismantle first two rings.


Big Bertha Thing transit

1. Take two fusion reactors.
2. Add two degauss cages.
3. Add length of High Tension cable.
4. Remove puff technology.
5. Replace mass transit system.
6. The experimental evidence is theological.
7. Bi-location is another one that the theologians got wrong.
8. Teleportation requires a saint, a sick person or both. (non-bio substitute)
9. Each acts as a capacitor, which builds up a charge.
10. Every energy saving light bulb has one.
11. It requires two doors.
12. It does not need a computer, which did not exist for many instances.


Big Bertha Thing orbiter

1. Take three fusion reactors.
2. Remove puff technology.
3. Fix reactors at right angles to each other.
4. Attach to nuclear submarine.
5. Remove propellers.
6. Add space sattelite ion thrusters.
7. Position at trailing point, where Earth travels arround the sun.
8. Take off for Earth orbit.
9. Move round Earth orbit to opposite point.
10. Make landing from Earth orbit.


Big Bertha Thing hyperspace

1. Take four or eight fusion reactors.
2. Arrange like juke-box carrousel.
3. Point at nearest star, off by a degree...


Big Bertha Thing spider
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/spider.html
Access page JPG 11K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.cycling

Drawing of a clockwork spider wheel and hairpin.

Extract from Introductory Chapter;-
The "Spider tops," which are frequently sold in the streets of London,
consist of a heavy little disc mounted on a spindle (Fig. XIV.).
When the disc has been set spinning a small curved piece of
metal is placed to touch the toe, and at once begins to slide round it,
first the side (a) in the figure, and then the side (b),
the motion continuing backwards and forwards till the top comes to rest.
The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case it is easy
to see that the rolling of the toe on the side of the metal produces
the motion.

From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing fact

Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science.
1. No iron moons and planetary cores.
2. No red shift measure of speed.
3. No Patrick Moore star at 95% the speed of light.
4. Muons arrive on earth.
5. Relativity is like an imaginary number; useful but not real.
6. Einstein-Haas gives a field strength 1/10000th the electric field.
7. Wave particle duality is a field effect.
8. Schroedinger is an approximation.

Who has the wit to check the fact?


Big Bertha Thing coil
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/coil.html
Access page JPG 9K Image
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics

Two drawings of a Gyroscopic Top complete with coil.

Extract from Introductory Chapter;-
The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case
it is easy to see that the rolling of the toe on the side
of the metal produces the motion. But Figs. XV. (a) and (b)
illustrate a top, whose spindle behaves in exactly the same
manner as the toe of the spider top, and yet is in no way magnetic.
The action is purely mechanical, as we shall explain in later pages.
It is an attractive top to watch, especially as it rushes round
the corner when it comes to the end of the coil.

From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing fiction

Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science.
9. Gyroscopic Top motion along coil masks a weaker field effect.

The Japanese antigravity experiment only worked one way.
With the object spinning one way OK, but the other way failed.
Anything but a fact...
10. One way gravity reduced and other way gravity increased,
so is bi-polar field efftect.
11. No antigravity, which is not bi-polar, so contradicts
bi-polar field effect.

Wave Particle Duality Paradox two slit interference patterns
can be disrupted by;-
1. Passive sensor near 2nd slit.
2. Turning room light on.
Anything but a fact...
12. LCD digital watch, without backlight, near 2nd slit.
13. Thicker wall between slits.

Redshift is both speedometer and tape measure.
According to redshift speedo, the universe has a go faster
stripe painted on the outside.
Anything but a fact...
14. No Big Bang, which needs go faster stripe on the inside
or antigravity.
15. No redshift speedo due to Steady State, which needs
neither to have go faster stripe.

Wave Particle Duality needs 1 slit and 2 slit experiments
to give different results from same effect. Make the walls
inside and outside the slits the same size and centre of
gravity.
Anything but a fact...
16. Centre of gravity is at slit in one, but not the other.
17. Equal forces act on the slit in one, but not the other.
18. Wave Particle Duality as a field effect gives different
results from same effect.
Tony Lance
2007-06-29 20:53:19 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing proton
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/proton.html
Access page JPG 55K Image
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including soc.history.medieval

Round photographic plates.

Caption;-
A pair of tracks, apparently arising simultaneously,
from a common point, outside the field of view.
The particles responsible for these tracks, have been ejected,
when a cosmic ray was absorbed.
The thinner track is that of a 120 MeV electron.
The more dense track is that of a 130 MeV proton.
This photograph was taken with a field of 17,000 oersteds.

From a book by
J.D.Stranathan Ph.D.,
Professor of Physics and Chairman of
Department, University of Kansas.
The "Particles" of Modern Physics.
(C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942

Big Bertha Thing laundry

My beautiful laundrette only had two machines,
so I asked my customers, if they would bring there own in.
Now we have seven machines and it is very nice.
Once we get the water pipes and electricity laid, it will be magnificent.
For water read data and electricity read documentation.

Pastures was released on OUSA Classical Particle conf.,
on 5th November 1997(Bonfire Night UK)

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997.
To comply with my copyright,
please distribute complete copies, free of charge.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Big Bertha Thing reason

1. Third Battle of Cyberspace.
2. Death Threats.(3)
3. Newsgroup Review.
4. Odd newsgroup users with 1000 postings.
5. Berserker attacks on legitimate postings to sci.astro et al.
6. Political and totally innexplicable.
7. Net Newbie basket cases.
8. Violent spam busters.
9. Abuse complaints procedure.
10. Web site closure.

Take your pick, the opposition will not give you the choice.
Tony Lance
2007-06-30 17:05:25 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing Halfrail
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/halfrail.html
Access page JPG 22K Image
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.gardening

Detail in photgraph of a model of Track on the Bottom Monorail Half.

Caption;-
Schilowsky's Monorail Car.

Extract from Chapter V;-
73. Another ingenious application of the gyroscope to a monorail car
has lately (Feb., 1914) been made by Monsieur Schilowsky, a Russian
inventor.....

So far as experiments have gone at present the weight of the gyroscope
is designed to be something between 1/10th and 1/25th of the whole
weight of the car, while the two pendulums together are about 1/3rd
of the weight of the gyroscope.

The author is indebted to M. Schilosky both for the diagrams and the
photograph from which plate IV has been made. A model of the car has
been presented by the inventor to the Science Museum at South
Kensington and can be viewed by the public at anytime. An article
on this monorail is to be found in the issue of The Engineer
for January 23, 1914.

From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing handbook

1. Handbook thread one posting long.
2. Correctly attributed.
3. Professional.
4. Steet savvy.
5. Well read.
6. Appropriate.
7. Source softly spoken.
8. Solitary.
9. More Sesame Street than Darth Vader.
10. Optional, optimal and optical.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


20 February 1998 13:38:16
Message
From: Tony Lance
Subject: Big Bertha Thing handbook
To: FC Mods Discussion
Cc: OUSA Classical Particle
Big Bertha Thing handbook

1. Handbook thread one posting long.
2. Correctly attributed.
3. Professional.
4. Steet savvy.
5. Well read.
6. Appropriate.
7. Source softly spoken.
8. Solitary.
9. More Sesame Street than Darth Vader.
10. Optional, optimal and optical.
Tony Lance
2007-07-02 16:46:51 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing unified
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/pip.html
111K Web Page access page
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including soc.history.medieval

RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM PHYSICS

The unification of
Quantum
and relativity theory

by Sidereus Nuncius
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics
Subject: What Time Is (I to IV)
Date: 18 Sep 1999

CONTENTS

TOPIC
1.Devotion
2.Dedication
3.Abstract
4.Introduction
5.Theory of Time
6.Theory of Space
7.Theory of Motion
8.Relativistic Quantum Physics


Big Bertha Thing pip

Dear Pip,
Guilty as charged. I should not have done any of the following;-

1.Defended you in the moderators newsgroup.
2.Given you an invitation, when the dogs were at your door.
3.Offered you a refuge, with the spam explosion survivors.
4.Ticked off the moderators.
5.Put your name up in lights on OUSA Astronomy and Astronomy and Space.
6.Put back the release of my software package,
just because of the spam troubles.

Personally I would take me out and shoot me,
there is no punishment too bad for any moderator,
who gets even one complaint. We should be above reproach,
like Caesers' wife.

I will of course remove the words
"Extract to explain the project to Pip" from all further postings.

Please accept my appologies for all the bad things I did,
before your elevation to moderator. I only pick on little people.
Thank you,
Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing tactics
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:17:36 +0000

24 February 1998 18:22:42
OUSA Astronomy Item
From: Frank Hollis
Subject: Re(2): Big Bertha Thing positron
To: OUSA Astronomy

Caroline Walcot,oufcnt2.open.ac.uk writes:


I don't see what pics of a positron particle (??) have to do with a conference on
Astronomy, which is basically stargazing and astrophysics and mainly optics.


Surely all this Big Bertha stuff should be diverted to a physics conference such as S271?


cheers


Caroline


Or even better, the conference that was specifically set up for exactly this material,
moderated by Spammer in Chief - Tony Lance.


Frank
Tony Lance
2007-07-03 16:09:48 UTC
Permalink
Big Bertha Thing Extract
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/readme.html
6K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.astro.amateur

Extract from Readme file to explain the Outlandish Particle Periodic Table.

From Pastures Software Package Documentation.
(Particle Structure Results Program in Fortran 77.)
Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System.
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.


Big Bertha Thing Deaf

One day God woke up, deaf-as-a-post. He could not hear anyone
speaking. Nothing, dinada, zilch, not even one line e-mail.
Fortunately it only lasted 6 days and He managed to keep himself busy.

A PPT takes 6 hours people time, 18 hours computer time. It just
seems longer.

Tony Lance
***@bigberthathing.co.uk


Newsgroups: sci.chem
From: Tony Lance <***@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:24:28 +0000
Local: Tues, Jan 23 2007 5:24 pm
Subject: Big Bertha Thing tactics


Big Bertha Thing tactics


To whom it may concern. (Newsgroup: sci.chem)
To defend against a denial of service attack on a newsgroup,
use the same tactics that Big Bertha Thing uses
on the most wanted list guys.
1. All threads are one posting long.
2. All replies are posted to one thread.
3. No postings of most wanted are read.
4. No replies to most wanted.
5. No direct criticism of most wanted.
6. All criticism should be pictorial, literate, allegorical
anecdotal and out of copyright.
7. It is a defense in English law that something which is not
libelous in one context, cannot be read in another
context as libelous.
8. This is also true of English universities, where the guy has tenure.
9. Corporate branding can reinforce trust, as well as irritation.
10. A group of guys posting across several newsgroups,
can have strategic reasons for their choice of newsgroups.
11. Three battles have been won so far. (39 family jewels)
12. The fourth battle is now on. (Asian Rim)
13. So I posted a picture of historical scientific interest,
which looked like a shell hole. (Virtual artillary shell)
14. Use double pass newsreader software to download headers,
before the rest of the postings. (NNTP)

http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/want04.html

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...